Just wanted to share a few pics of one of our latest custom turbo fabs on a fairly new car.

2007 Honda S2000









Specs:

GT35R
Custom Turbo Manifold
Custom Intercooler Piping
Custom 3 inch Down Pipe
Tial BOV
Tial 44mm Wastegate
FMIC
Precision Injectors
Greddy Boost Controller
Greddy Turbo Timer
Tein Flex
Tein EDFC's
Apexi Catback

Dyno numbers coming soon!

 

red XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

 

pics?

 

Sorry Folks my server went down....Be up soon

 

damn...that turbo look so weird all uncluttered haha. so useto seeing turbo's squeezed into super tight spaces. is the bottom end all stock? what are your power goals?

 

JG manifold?

 

clean

 

what are you tuning with?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GDM S2K &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">JG manifold?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yes

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by pos_cd5 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">damn...that turbo look so weird all uncluttered haha. so useto seeing turbo's squeezed into super tight spaces. is the bottom end all stock? what are your power goals?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yes the bottom end is stock, Its a customers car. He wants to keep it conservative.

 

very nice choice nothing easier than a detachable turbo

 

Has potential, needs a little work


Modified by MidwestAutoWorks at 8:30 PM 9/6/2007

 

Steve...give a pic of the battery relocate too please.


Modified by negcamber at 8:07 PM 9/5/2007

 

i'm really interested in the tuning info because I haven't seen anything yet that is available and works with the DBW

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MidwestAutoWorks &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wow looks like ****</TD></TR></TABLE>

that better be sarcastic.....it looks like pretty f'in clean of an install to me. . .

 

oo and i like the wastegate priority too.....shouldn't have any creep issues with that manifold!!!!

 

Aren't oil drains supposed to be pointed down, to make the best use of gravity to pull the oil out of the turbo bearing assembly?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DavidR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Aren't oil drains supposed to be pointed down, to make the best use of gravity to pull the oil out of the turbo bearing assembly?</TD></TR></TABLE>

It is the oil feed is what you see and on top like it should be.

 

I like the install. My only comment would be to clock the turbo, if possible, so the oil feed & return are in a 90-270 degree position from each other. What are you using to tune it with?


Modified by RacerXI at 10:46 PM 9/5/2007

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by velocitytrends &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Yes the bottom end is stock, Its a customers car. He wants to keep it conservative. </TD></TR></TABLE>

thats a pretty damn big turbo for keeping things 'conservative' haha. so i think its safe to assume its retaining the stock c/r. how much PSI you hoping to boost with that GT35?

 

GT35 and he wants to be conservative? why not a quicker spooling turbo with less power potential? just curious

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LAS2K &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">GT35 and he wants to be conservative? why not a quicker spooling turbo with less power potential? just curious </TD></TR></TABLE>

thats what im thinking

 

The intercooler needs to be wider to fill the front bumper, the cold side charge pipe needs to come straight up and in, not use that ugly angle

 

tell em tony

 

Going with the Apexi Neo for now until there is more available. We had to wire using the OE mapping specs of the ECU harness. Worked pretty good. I plan on doing the write up for the NEo on this year model S2K and later so it readily available.

Why is that? Just curious as to why grown *** men act like children. Why run your pooper as if you were the inovative mind that created the torch. You have your preffered style of building and welding we have ours. You also have your opionions, but before you go flapping your toe nail grinder, it would have been nice if you said......"wow looks like ****" and had a picture of one of your S2K piping showing us how it should be done to "your" specs and requirements. I mean I would only blast someone with the assumption of (me having)better judgement knowing I had justified it (with a pic of my work) along with my blasting of someone elses work. I know though your some bad *** shop, that has everyone on your nuts (maybe in only your town) and your head has gotten so big you think your the race gods gift to the Honda world. Act like a man and coach your umpa lumpas (GRAF-FITI) as well to do the same.

Yes they are supposed to be that way. If you look at the the forth pic from the top going down, you can see the cross member right underneath the return line. We tried it both ways with a 90 degree and a straight going down and under the cross member and found for it to be more beneficial to do it the way it is now. Its not 100% going straight down, but it goo enough. The feed line makes it look like its a weird angle yes, but when we put the AN fitting on the return the angle it has makes for the best solution for the return. Its working out fine.

Above I wrote about the return and the neo...hope that helps. BTW thanks for the great comment.

Yeah, he got the turbo he wanted, and that we recommended for future upgrades. He eventually wants more so we got the turbo set-up to where it decent to support future development of his car. The car will be seeing only 8psi for right now.

Function over fashion!