All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

Performer X vs. ITBs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2007 | 08:40 PM
  #1  
94typeR's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Default Performer X vs. ITBs

has the performer x been compared to itbs with dyno charts yet???
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 08:05 AM
  #2  
SkankyEJ7's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,919
Likes: 0
From: Auburn, AL, usa
Default Re: Performer X vs. ITBs (94typeR)

i don't belive so
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 09:52 AM
  #3  
DonF's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 1
From: Atl. Beach, fl, duval
Default Re: Performer X vs. ITBs (SkankyEJ7)

Yes they have, custom Jenvey's produced 9 more BHP at the top.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 10:18 AM
  #4  
IntegraType-R's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
From: Baton rouge, LA, USA
Default Re: Performer X vs. ITBs (DonF)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DonF &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes they have, custom Jenvey's produced 9 more BHP at the top. </TD></TR></TABLE>
pwned.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 10:45 AM
  #5  
dblock2x's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Default Re: Performer X vs. ITBs (IntegraType-R)

how so?

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DonF &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes they have, custom Jenvey's produced 9 more BHP at the top. </TD></TR></TABLE>

custom being not off shelf; not something someone always has; and anyway comparing 9 PEAK BHP over an intake manifold; isn't that impressive.

Performer X
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 12:26 PM
  #6  
pimpinblackcivic's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: edinburgh, uk
Default

how does performer x compare to standard b16 or ITR?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #7  
SkankyEJ7's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,919
Likes: 0
From: Auburn, AL, usa
Default Re: (pimpinblackcivic)

beats them bad
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 01:07 PM
  #8  
IntegraType-R's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
From: Baton rouge, LA, USA
Default Re: Performer X vs. ITBs (cooper.)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cooper. &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">how so?

custom being not off shelf; not something someone always has; and anyway comparing 9 PEAK BHP over an intake manifold; isn't that impressive.

Performer X </TD></TR></TABLE>
.. pretty much i know itbs are a wide range of uses and well fitments. But, in this case, just cause its custom doesn't mean ****, the lines and fuel rail could be custom, but its off the shelf runners, manifold and stacks. You dont know what "custom" is.
On the street, some dude with a pretty close setup to mine, swapped his pro series out for this motor, and he got beat worst then before when he had his pro series. I'm sortof tuned, he's fully tuned.. just an idea of comparing apples to oranges tho.. itbs and a manifold is different in alot of ways.

But itbs will make more power then a off the shelf manifold anyday, IF the motor has the supporting mods for it.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 01:32 PM
  #9  
DonF's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 1
From: Atl. Beach, fl, duval
Default Re: Performer X vs. ITBs (IntegraType-R)

I happen to like the Performer X maifold, with a little matching it performes very well. The question was had it been compared to ITB,s. The answer was yes. The custom part of the Jenvey's ment it was matched to the engine, bore size, air horn, etc. Other one size fits all ITB's may perform worse than the Performer X, this combination made more all the way accross the board, not all will.
I probably should have not even answered this thread, I will know better next time. Too many experts on here that bought a Ebay copy header and their "butt" dyno says it's Bad ***.Probably is compared to the old B16 header they had.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 01:33 PM
  #10  
IntegraType-R's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
From: Baton rouge, LA, USA
Default Re: Performer X vs. ITBs (DonF)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DonF &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I happen to like the Performer X maifold, with a little matching it performes very well. The question was had it been compared to ITB,s. The answer was yes. The custom part of the Jenvey's ment it was matched to the engine, bore size, air horn, etc. Other one size fits all ITB's may perform worse than the Performer X, this combination made more all the way accross the board, not all will.
I probably should have not even answered this thread, I will know better next time. Too many experts on here that bought a Ebay copy header and their "butt" dyno says it's Bad ***.Probably is compared to the old B16 header they had.</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol +1 donf
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 01:38 PM
  #11  
93-lsvtec-eh2's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: smallbany, south GA, us
Default Re: Performer X vs. ITBs (DonF)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DonF &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I happen to like the Performer X maifold, with a little matching it performes very well. The question was had it been compared to ITB,s. The answer was yes. The custom part of the Jenvey's ment it was matched to the engine, bore size, air horn, etc. Other one size fits all ITB's may perform worse than the Performer X, this combination made more all the way accross the board, not all will.
I probably should have not even answered this thread, I will know better next time. Too many experts on here that bought a Ebay copy header and their "butt" dyno says it's Bad ***.Probably is compared to the old B16 header they had.</TD></TR></TABLE>


hey watch it buddy talking crap on my header'S i'll get my mom to whoop your *** lol
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 02:08 PM
  #12  
DonF's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 1
From: Atl. Beach, fl, duval
Default Re: Performer X vs. ITBs (93-lsvtec-eh2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93-lsvtec-eh2 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


hey watch it buddy talking crap on my header'S i'll get my mom to whoop your *** lol</TD></TR></TABLE> What headers. You need to send some.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 03:16 PM
  #13  
94typeR's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Default

the performerx could be considered the "best" IM out there for a NA setup.

but how bad of a beating does a itb have over the performer. i want to know midrange and topend
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 03:24 PM
  #14  
DonF's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 1
From: Atl. Beach, fl, duval
Default Re: (94typeR)

Which ITB's? There are several choices, just as there are plenum intakes. I swaped out 93-lsvtec-eh2's ITB's with different ones and made better numbers. Comparing his old ITB's to the new ones is like an LS manifold to a Performer x.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 03:48 PM
  #15  
IntegraType-R's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
From: Baton rouge, LA, USA
Default Re: (DonF)

what before / after itbs?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #16  
94typeR's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Default Re: (DonF)

jenvey vs performerx
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #17  
HipHapa-Eg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
From: Where friends and family is all that matters, CA
Default Re: (94typeR)

not to change the thread, but what about performer x vs. skunk2 intake mani
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2007 | 09:25 PM
  #18  
94typeR's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Default Re: (HipHapa-Eg)

performerx &gt; * in terms of IM for a NA setup. yes even the ported IB.

then again, it depends on the setup.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2007 | 03:58 AM
  #19  
93-lsvtec-eh2's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: smallbany, south GA, us
Default Re: (IntegraType-R)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by IntegraType-R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what before / after itbs?</TD></TR></TABLE>

old style two piece twm itb's with a jenvey manifold compared to a full set of 48mm taper bore jenveys new jenveys won by a long shot

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HipHapa-Eg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not to change the thread, but what about performer x vs. skunk2 intake mani</TD></TR></TABLE>

fit and finish = skunk2 hands down

power and fits like **** = performer x all day long
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 12:04 PM
  #20  
GO-FIGHT-KILL's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,303
Likes: 1
From: Wilmington, NC
Default

Do Performer-X intake manifolds not fit very well?
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 12:56 PM
  #21  
pimpinblackcivic's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: edinburgh, uk
Default

not if you do a search on it, a lot of people have had to modify parts to fit
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #22  
SubTitle's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,788
Likes: 0
From: Palm Springs, So. CaL
Default Re: (pimpinblackcivic)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by pimpinblackcivic &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not if you do a search on it, a lot of people have had to modify parts to fit</TD></TR></TABLE>
searching all the old threads its not that bad what u have to do. At the end of the day it makes good *** power
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdmciviccxeg92
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
Jul 18, 2007 10:47 AM
SEFIxCivic
Forced Induction
27
Mar 10, 2006 07:36 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:22 AM.