I currently have 205/45/16's on my 2005 Civic coupe. I like how these handle but they are a little rough on the ride. I was thinking about moving up to a 205/50/16 for a little more cushion. My question is how much handling will I lose if I move to the 50? Will I even be able to tell a difference? The car is just a daily driver. If anyone had any pictures of the difference between the two that would be great. I don't want the tire to look huge. I'm not lowered either. Thanks.

 

I don't know who told you to get 205/45-16, but that size is too small for a 2005 Civic (almost 4 percent smaller diameter than your stock tire size). Maybe you bought used wheels and tires from someone with an Integra or older ('96-00) Civic?

Anyway, just go ahead and get the 205/50-16. Not only will it give you a bit more cushion, but it will also preserve the accuracy of your speedometer and odometer (which are currently reading 4 percent high due to your undersized tires).

There shouldn't be any significant difference in handling. If you really care about handling, get a grippier tire. 205/50-16 is a very common tire size. I recommend:

Goodyear F1 GS-D3 $112.50 after rebate, for terrific handling on dry roads and in rain

Avon Tech M500 $76, if you are willing to trade off some performance (still very good though) for a lower purchase price

Kumho Ecsta ASX $71, if you need to use these tires in occasional snow in winter as well as in moderate to warm temperatures the rest of the year

 

Thanks for your input. I don't know why I got the smaller size. I knew the speedo would be off. They were new wheels and tires. When I ordered them they recommended the 45 for my car. After reading, I saw that most people get the 50 unless they are lowered. Next time I will go with the 50 after these tires wear out.

 

205/50/16 is perfect, i got my wheels used and they have 205/45/16 which is too small, i have a 2001 civic similar to yours.