itr inake manifold on a b16
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: san antoniio, tx, bexar
itr inake manifold on a b16
i wanted to know if it realy made a differince puting a itr intake manifold in a b16 the only mods i have right now are coldair intake and gsr cams and dc header im also have a proplem with vtec does the vss sensor have to conected so the vtec can work
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
From: Regina, Sask, Canada
Re: itr inake manifold on a b16 (d16z6ef)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by d16z6ef »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> im also have a proplem with vtec does the vss sensor have to conected so the vtec can work</TD></TR></TABLE>
i believe so.
i believe so.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
From: Damascus Maryland
Re: itr inake manifold on a b16 (Malakai)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Malakai »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i believe so.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you are correct sir...
and to the OP for the intake manifold... You could but its alot of work for not a whole lot of power.. And if your going to spend that money you might as well spend like 50$ more and get a skunk2 or AEBS...
Most of the times b16s dont see the gains as a 1.8l motor would.. Unless you have headwork/cams done..
Hope this helps
i believe so.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you are correct sir...
and to the OP for the intake manifold... You could but its alot of work for not a whole lot of power.. And if your going to spend that money you might as well spend like 50$ more and get a skunk2 or AEBS...
Most of the times b16s dont see the gains as a 1.8l motor would.. Unless you have headwork/cams done..
Hope this helps
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: CA, USA
Re: (4thgenx42)
I put an ITR IM on my stock B16, and the car felt slower in the low and mid range than when i had the stock IM on. I couldn't really tell a difference on the top end, although i believe it is supposed to help.
I ended up selling the ITR IM and putting on the stock one and the car felt much smoother.
I ended up selling the ITR IM and putting on the stock one and the car felt much smoother.
Trending Topics
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
From: Damascus Maryland
Re: (Malakai)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 4thgenx42 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes putting an ITR IM is better for your engine. Creates better flow etc...</TD></TR></TABLE>
not on a stock b16
Intake manifolds usually dont make any real power on b16s without headwork/valvetrain...
I have seen personally on a dyno where a skunk2 intake manifold LOST power up until like 7k rpm on a stockish b16.. It only made about 3whp from 7-8300 rpm..
It moves the power band up higher so a b16 with head work would benift..
Long story short.. Unless you have a better flowing head or a 1.8l motor.. You aint gonna see any gains..
Keep the b16
-Kevin
not on a stock b16
Intake manifolds usually dont make any real power on b16s without headwork/valvetrain...
I have seen personally on a dyno where a skunk2 intake manifold LOST power up until like 7k rpm on a stockish b16.. It only made about 3whp from 7-8300 rpm..
It moves the power band up higher so a b16 with head work would benift..
Long story short.. Unless you have a better flowing head or a 1.8l motor.. You aint gonna see any gains..
Keep the b16
-Kevin
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Deetz
Acura Integra Type-R
5
Dec 23, 2004 09:59 AM
vtecgod
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
Jul 9, 2003 09:49 AM