BLOX cams Type A or B on JDM ITR, need opinions and experience, pls !
i have searched and could not find any ITR motor using blox type a cams, or type b cams. i have sold my stock itr cams and is looking for an inexpensive set of aftermarket cams. i can either stay with stock valvetrain if i go with the type a or get supertech valvetrain if going with the type b.
so anyone using these setups, and what kind of numbers and gain i m looking to get.
if no one has similar setup, then are these cams good for stock itr motors or should i look into something else ?
it's a stock 97 jdm itr motor. inputs are very welcome. thanks.
so anyone using these setups, and what kind of numbers and gain i m looking to get.
if no one has similar setup, then are these cams good for stock itr motors or should i look into something else ?
it's a stock 97 jdm itr motor. inputs are very welcome. thanks.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ITRacer121 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I ran Blox Bs for a time on OMNI valves, springs and retainers
Made good power up top.
but if your getting cams on a budget and stock valve trane I would recommend Buddy club 3+</TD></TR></TABLE>
do u still remember what # did u put down ? and any low end lost at all ?
thanks for all the input, guys.
Made good power up top.
but if your getting cams on a budget and stock valve trane I would recommend Buddy club 3+</TD></TR></TABLE>
do u still remember what # did u put down ? and any low end lost at all ?
thanks for all the input, guys.
Blox cams are a great bang for the buck. Same as Skunk. I'm running Blox B's on my jdm type r motor making 221whp/142wtq SAE on a dynojet.
Trending Topics
search my name I believe the dyno charts are still up
Box cams had very little improvement over stock on the bottom while on the top they improved alot (192whp with 132trq)
The BC had a huge gains on bottom and decent on top(186whp with 136trq)
I think thats what the numbers were but dont hold me to it. If it was me I would do the BC again. The blox were fun but only if I was above 6K rpm while the BC were fun in the DD user power band (1500-7000rpm). BC 3+ felt faster all the time.
Box cams had very little improvement over stock on the bottom while on the top they improved alot (192whp with 132trq)
The BC had a huge gains on bottom and decent on top(186whp with 136trq)
I think thats what the numbers were but dont hold me to it. If it was me I would do the BC again. The blox were fun but only if I was above 6K rpm while the BC were fun in the DD user power band (1500-7000rpm). BC 3+ felt faster all the time.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HotboxedTypeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Blox cams are a great bang for the buck. Same as Skunk. I'm running Blox B's on my jdm type r motor making 221whp/142wtq SAE on a dynojet.</TD></TR></TABLE>
is this on stock bottom end and unported head ? do u hv dyno sheet ? thx.
thx again for all the inputs.
is this on stock bottom end and unported head ? do u hv dyno sheet ? thx.
thx again for all the inputs.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rare92gsr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
is this on stock bottom end and unported head ? do u hv dyno sheet ? thx.
thx again for all the inputs.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
ported head
is this on stock bottom end and unported head ? do u hv dyno sheet ? thx.
thx again for all the inputs.
</TD></TR></TABLE>ported head
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rare92gsr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thx.
HotboxedTypeR, u hv very respectable power.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks
HotboxedTypeR, u hv very respectable power.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Thanks
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rare92gsr
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
8
May 29, 2007 09:18 PM
jonness
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
2
Oct 21, 2006 01:21 PM
Kyoto now
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
1
Jul 21, 2006 07:52 PM





