i have a 94 accord ex 2.2l inline 4 stock. Im pretty much just interested in it going faster. I was thinking about upgrading most internals and adding a turbo or twin. Do you think it will be worth my time to do this too my cr or will the speed increase not really be worth the money. The car is in preety good shape with 40000 miles on it. Almost like new. Any other ideas will be accepted. Im new at the and most of you know a lot me than me so any help will be appreciated thanks

 

twin turbo on a 4 cylinder?? LOL, i'd have the quarter mile done with my stock f22b while your stuck at your 90 foot mark waiting for your "turbos" to spool up. Anyways, keep it simple if your going to stick with the f22, meaning intake, header, exhaust. Thats usually good for 10 hp. If you feel like going a little further get yourself a fuel rail, injectors, regulator, and a Programmable fuel management like a VAFC II. Upgrading internals on an f22 isnt worth it. If your going for big HP numbers look at spending close to 2k base to get your ride hooked up H22 style. That would be something to "boost" and do internals on.

 

Fuel rail, fuel injectors, and a fuel pressure regulator will do nothing for a car with only bolt-ons. There would be absolutely no benefit from them.

A built motor not worth it? I guess it all depends on what someone wants out of a car.

You don't need an H22. For the cost of an H22 swap, you can have a turbo setup on the F22 that makes the H22 look as fast as a one-legged gorilla on a unicycle. For the cost of an H22 swap + turbo, you could have a built F22 + turbo. But if you want 500+ horsepower you'll want a built H22.

 

H22. Simple less problems youll like it.