My modifying an aftermarket cross-member for ground clearance
I thought you guys might find this write-up interesting.
It shows how I modified my Place Racing cross-member for ground clearance and also strength (it also applys to the cross-member built by some others).
http://www.performanceforum.co....html
And here is a teaser photo of it installed;

Wes V
It shows how I modified my Place Racing cross-member for ground clearance and also strength (it also applys to the cross-member built by some others).
http://www.performanceforum.co....html
And here is a teaser photo of it installed;
Wes V
Always look forward to your write-ups.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I've never felt the need to have a cross-member that uses heim joints. </TD></TR></TABLE> Why is that?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I've never felt the need to have a cross-member that uses heim joints. </TD></TR></TABLE> Why is that?
Dr;
It's not really that I have anything major league against heim joints, but their usage brings up a bunch of issues for me. In other words, I tend to get rather **** about the engineering (I'm a structural engineer). I could point out design flaws on almost all the "traction bars" out there, but it's just nit-picking at the extreme.
I could see building a cross-member using them, but on a street car don't see the need.
Wes.
It's not really that I have anything major league against heim joints, but their usage brings up a bunch of issues for me. In other words, I tend to get rather **** about the engineering (I'm a structural engineer). I could point out design flaws on almost all the "traction bars" out there, but it's just nit-picking at the extreme.
I could see building a cross-member using them, but on a street car don't see the need.
Wes.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Wes V »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> I could point out design flaws on almost all the "traction bars" out there</TD></TR></TABLE>
Please elaborate, I'm curious since the radius rods on the EF's are so critical.
Please elaborate, I'm curious since the radius rods on the EF's are so critical.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by racin_jayson »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Please elaborate, I'm curious since the radius rods on the EF's are so critical.</TD></TR></TABLE>
In most cases, it's just nit-picking and I'd prefer to not rag on anybodies product.
There are other stings on this site where traction bar design is discussed.
Wes
Please elaborate, I'm curious since the radius rods on the EF's are so critical.</TD></TR></TABLE>
In most cases, it's just nit-picking and I'd prefer to not rag on anybodies product.
There are other stings on this site where traction bar design is discussed.
Wes
this is the traction bar thread
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread/1156671
* exclaimer: there is a lot of bickering in this thread along with some good information
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread/1156671
* exclaimer: there is a lot of bickering in this thread along with some good information
thanks guys, I read it the other night (took forever.) just thought it would be neat to hear some opinions from an engineering standpoint, no solid conclusions were ever drawn from that thread. Anyways....
Great article Wes!
Great article Wes!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Wes V »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The thing is that suspension design is a highly opinionated thing that leads to arguements.
I'd rather talk about religion.
Wes</TD></TR></TABLE>
haha
I'd rather talk about religion.
Wes</TD></TR></TABLE>
haha
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jonathan_ED3
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
3
Jun 23, 2006 06:03 PM
STHPERFORMANCE
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
12
Jan 27, 2004 08:41 AM





