Drag Racing Drag Racing (legal) & Associated Topics

42r and k series, h2b in sfwd ?'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 08:33 PM
  #1  
vtecspeed1320's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shooting Star
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,408
Likes: 0
From: The Lou, MO, US
Default 42r and k series, h2b in sfwd ?'s

Why are the k series guys not allowed to run the 42r, but the h2b is allowed in sfwd and more than likely will be able to use the 42r. Are there turbos that are comparable in size, power, spool time to the 42r that the k series guys can use?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2007 | 08:50 PM
  #2  
Arturbo's Avatar
Better than steak
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,859
Likes: 0
Default Re: 42r and k series, h2b in sfwd ?'s (vtecspeed1320)

GT4094
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 11:50 AM
  #3  
vtecspeed1320's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shooting Star
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,408
Likes: 0
From: The Lou, MO, US
Default

With the gearing of the b series trans and the power the h can produce...wonder if they will outlaw the 42r on that setup.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 11:53 AM
  #4  
hybridEj6's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
From: Two blocks from the beach, CA, United States
Default Re: (vtecspeed1320)

because a H2b hasnt trapped 167MPH
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 12:23 PM
  #5  
Clayton's Avatar
H-T Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 12
Default Re: (hybridEj6)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hybridEj6 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">because a H2b hasnt trapped 167MPH</TD></TR></TABLE>

Neither has the K series in anything but a fluke "lean as hell and about to explode" scenario
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 12:34 PM
  #6  
morgan@synapse motorsport's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,278
Likes: 0
From: upstate, ny
Default

that still counts. i still think its bogus they banned the 42r. let the k series present its dominance in sfwd
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 12:53 PM
  #7  
crazykid's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Ingersoll, Ontario, Canada
Default Re: (Clayton)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Clayton &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Neither has the K series in anything but a fluke "lean as hell and about to explode" scenario</TD></TR></TABLE>

Lean is mean.... isnt that the old saying???

It will be intresting to see how the H2B does this year, i have been a avid fan of H series motors since I got into Hondas years ago... and who knows, the rules seem to change often enough when there is a need a for a revision.

Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 12:59 PM
  #8  
trickeng's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 1
From: Salem,NH
Default Re: (Clayton)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Clayton &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Neither has the K series in anything but a fluke "lean as hell and about to explode" scenario</TD></TR></TABLE>

??? fluke ??? didn't he back it up with a 165mph pass along with a 163mph pass??? doesn't seem to flukey to me.

there is no such thing as to lean unless he was towed back to the pits because he blew the motor. if it didn't blew during the pass i would consider that tuned perfectly for that days condition. it may of been a little lucky, but not a fluke.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 01:03 PM
  #9  
vtecspeed1320's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shooting Star
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,408
Likes: 0
From: The Lou, MO, US
Default

that would be unfair to the sport though...almost forcing everyone to have to build new programs and sink money in k's
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 01:05 PM
  #10  
tony1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,814
Likes: 8
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Default Re: (trickeng)

The H isn't really any more efficient that a properly built B series, which means it'll max out around the same power as a B series with the 42r. That turbo can only provide so much air, the efficiency of the motor is what will determine what the ultimate power output will be with a given amount of airflow.

Ramming air into the inlet of the turbo does help things a bit though...
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 01:53 PM
  #11  
sportfwddc2's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Default Re: (vtecspeed1320)

The K series was rule revision was B.S. but its the way it is and i think we can still make the same power on different smaller turbo's. Its just funny that there has been 3-4 b series cars trap 160+ mph but they keep getting more revisions in there favor its a joke..
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 02:04 PM
  #12  
Arturbo's Avatar
Better than steak
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,859
Likes: 0
Default Re: (sportfwddc2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sportfwddc2 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The K series was rule revision was B.S. but its the way it is and i think we can still make the same power on different smaller turbo's. Its just funny that there has been 3-4 b series cars trap 160+ mph but they keep getting more revisions in there favor its a joke.. </TD></TR></TABLE>
mph tells you everything. After the rule change the k-series car, T1 and maxworks all had the same mph. Seems fair to me.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 02:06 PM
  #13  
morgan@synapse motorsport's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,278
Likes: 0
From: upstate, ny
Default

so theres 3 people close in mph why not cripple the b series to 67mm compressors and there will be 20-30 people with closer traps.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 02:08 PM
  #14  
tony1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,814
Likes: 8
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Default Re: (mike@synapse motorsport)

Mazworx was with a 67mm compressor... lol
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 02:31 PM
  #15  
h22 civic's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 1
From: ORIGINAL H22 GANGSTA
Default Re: (tony1)

i personally think people where gung ho with the b series for so long cause of no other options really. h series was a option but the tranny was a weak link said by many so no r&d was put into it ......b series technology is old now for this time and day they make good power and are pretty reliable but i think they are maxed out.....it just so happens that the k series (newer technology) and the h2b plates came out about the same time so now their are 2 more options put to the table ...i believe you will be seeing alot more h series motors being run once people see the potential of them matted with a b series tranny i also believe the 42r will be outlawed on them too once they start see the power being made
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 02:32 PM
  #16  
GrinderGuy2's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
From: n00 Jersey, usa
Default Re: (tony1)

i dont care what anybody says, 167mph wasnt happening twice/thrice in one day.. From what i was told, that motor was on the brink..

162mph and 167 is a lil different lol
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 02:33 PM
  #17  
tony1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,814
Likes: 8
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Default Re: (h22 civic)

Who tricked you guys into thinking the B tranny is a lot better than the H? lol
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 03:41 PM
  #18  
JDogg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,072
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
Default Re: (tony1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Who tricked you guys into thinking the B tranny is a lot better than the H? lol</TD></TR></TABLE>

idk, but my h trannys suck at changing gears above 8500 ish rpms..they can hold whatever kind power u want though.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #19  
tony1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,814
Likes: 8
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Default Re: (JDogg)

I could have sworn in an old post about the H shift linkages you were saying that yours shifted fine a 9k and you didn't understand why other people had problems?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 03:59 PM
  #20  
vtecspeed1320's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shooting Star
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,408
Likes: 0
From: The Lou, MO, US
Default Re: (JDogg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDogg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">idk, but my h trannys suck at changing gears above 8500 ish rpms..they can hold whatever kind power u want though.</TD></TR></TABLE>x2... and there is many gearing options with a b series you dont get with the h. And I think someone said there is a 7% driveline loss with an h trans over a b series trans. <TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The H isn't really any more efficient that a properly built B series, which means it'll max out around the same power as a B series with the 42r. That turbo can only provide so much air, the efficiency of the motor is what will determine what the ultimate power output will be with a given amount of airflow.

Ramming air into the inlet of the turbo does help things a bit though... </TD></TR></TABLE>Is there 87x90.7 b series builds? And also how is an h not more efficient, doesnt the head flow way more than a b series. The only thing the H is lacking is aftermarket help.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 04:06 PM
  #21  
2fast4u831's Avatar
I'm really 2slow
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,986
Likes: 7
From: near Laguna Seca CA, USA
Default Re: (vtecspeed1320)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I could have sworn in an old post about the H shift linkages you were saying that yours shifted fine a 9k and you didn't understand why other people had problems?</TD></TR></TABLE>that was probably speedworks
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 04:37 PM
  #22  
Tyler H's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Default Re: (2FAST4U831)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2FAST4U831 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">that was probably speedworks </TD></TR></TABLE>

That was probably me.

If you don't have enough brains, determination, or money (in some combination of the three) to go fast with an H trans, you're probably not going to go fast on a B trans either.

The Saenz H-series gear set was out long before the Liberty B-series gear set was...
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 04:41 PM
  #23  
EATIN UP UR BSERIES's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
From: I LOVE BOOST,CT
Default Re: (tony1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Who tricked you guys into thinking the B tranny is a lot better than the H? lol</TD></TR></TABLE>

i want to make this my signature...
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 05:13 PM
  #24  
wHOAlly's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,901
Likes: 0
From: JDM ricer land, CA
Default Re: (Tyler H)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tyler H &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
If you don't have enough brains, determination, or money (in some combination of the three) to go fast with an H trans, you're probably not going to go fast on a B trans either. </TD></TR></TABLE>

good thing u had alot of money
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 07:22 PM
  #25  
JDogg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,072
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
Default Re: (wHOAlly)

yeah i thought it did till i spent some time with my type r tranny.. the r tranny is so much more effortless to get it into gear at high rpm. the h trannys i always had to be very deliberate and make sure i hit the gear exactly right every time or it wouldnt go into gear. and when we changed from the lighter 4 puck disk to the heavier 6 puck disk it went to **** completly... the syncros just arent very good at slowing the main shaft

my type r tranny took 18k miles of 9500 rpm hell from me and still hits the gears like a champ
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:05 AM.