17" rimmer's post pics
I can't decide if I want 16's or 17's. I saw a pic of someone else's 16's on here, and they looked OK. Can anyone post their ride w/ 17" rims please so I can see the difference?
you really wont find many people sporting 17's on their civic, i did when i first got it, but i have seen the light.
me playing chauffer(SP?) shitty pic but its my ej8 on my 17's
me playing chauffer(SP?) shitty pic but its my ej8 on my 17's
Whats so bad with 17's ? I don't have problems with mine
ps: This is not my only set a rims I used to have 15" slipstreams and it did not look that good.
ps: This is not my only set a rims I used to have 15" slipstreams and it did not look that good.
search!!!!!!!1 wrong thread, <U>please use this thread! thk u </U>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1850913
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1850913
I was going to get 17s but they aren't bad.. Depends if you have an EF (92-95) or EG (96-00) a little bit. I will be getting 16s once i get $$ and find the style I want.
16's are good for performance and they also do look good.
17's are more showy but kind of bog your car down a bit with the extra weight, etc...
Your choice.
16's are good for performance and they also do look good.
17's are more showy but kind of bog your car down a bit with the extra weight, etc...
Your choice.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ke98248 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I was going to get 17s but they aren't bad.. Depends if you have an EG (92-95) or EK (96-00) a little bit. I will be getting 16s once i get $$ and find the style I want.
16's are good for performance and they also do look good.
17's are more showy but kind of bog your car down a bit with the extra weight, etc...
Your choice.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
fixed
and jit01 what i meant was that most 17's are heavy as stated above and after lowering my car could no longer fit. basically i got 17's because i got a good deal on them and they looked good but when i decided to go for performance they were no longer what i wanted.
16's are good for performance and they also do look good.
17's are more showy but kind of bog your car down a bit with the extra weight, etc...
Your choice.
</TD></TR></TABLE>fixed
and jit01 what i meant was that most 17's are heavy as stated above and after lowering my car could no longer fit. basically i got 17's because i got a good deal on them and they looked good but when i decided to go for performance they were no longer what i wanted.
Trending Topics
)hey 92-95 arent Efs..they are EG civics..EFs are like 91 and below to 88...ek civics are 96-2000...
go with which you think looks better and is more of your style on the wheels...I currently have 15" SSR type x's on my civic with 205/50 of rubber(I think there 15s...maybe 16s..I will have to double check



one more just for show...
the inside of my motor
go with which you think looks better and is more of your style on the wheels...I currently have 15" SSR type x's on my civic with 205/50 of rubber(I think there 15s...maybe 16s..I will have to double check



one more just for show...
the inside of my motor
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b16nonoy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">)hey 92-95 arent Efs..they are EG civics
WRONG !!!!!!!!!!-THEY ARE EJ1'S=EX ej2=dx
..EFs are like 91 and below to 88...right!
ek civics are 96-2000...wrong!!!!!!!x2! ek are hatches 96-00, and ej6 i beleive are dx? and ej8 are ex,,, i might be wrong tho it might be 99-00=ej8/96-98=ej6<U>but hands down we all know em1 is the best chasis ftmfw</U>
</TD></TR></TABLE>
WRONG !!!!!!!!!!-THEY ARE EJ1'S=EX ej2=dx
..EFs are like 91 and below to 88...right!
ek civics are 96-2000...wrong!!!!!!!x2! ek are hatches 96-00, and ej6 i beleive are dx? and ej8 are ex,,, i might be wrong tho it might be 99-00=ej8/96-98=ej6<U>but hands down we all know em1 is the best chasis ftmfw</U>
</TD></TR></TABLE>
well if you want to get technical, 88-91 hatches are ed/ef, 88-91 sedans are ef/ed, 88-91 wagons are ee's, coupes 92-00 are ej's, 92-95 hatches are eg/eh, del sols are eg/eh, 96-00 hatches are ej/ek, sedans 92-00 came in eg/eh/ej and the 99-00 si is em1.
it gets kind of complicated, it depends on the trim level/body style/year so to simplify we use this :
88-91 = ef
92-95 = eg
96-00 = ek
and to stay on topic, on ef/eg's i wouldnt go bigger than 15's and on ek's i wouldnt go bigger than 16's. less weight is always better.
it gets kind of complicated, it depends on the trim level/body style/year so to simplify we use this :
88-91 = ef
92-95 = eg
96-00 = ek
and to stay on topic, on ef/eg's i wouldnt go bigger than 15's and on ek's i wouldnt go bigger than 16's. less weight is always better.
I'm a Jackass cause i dont like to follow the rules.
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY, USA

heres a crappy picture of my em1 with 17 rims. It's dirty cause I cant even drive it to the car wash
. 5 more days and it'll be all back together
. Now I have a quick question... I have a socketed obd1 p72 ecu and orderd a chip form xenocron. This will be put in the car while I drive down to xenocron. now when i drive down there should i drive on my stock map sensor or my GM 3 bar? what will be the difference? Can I drive my car for about a week before it's tuned with no harm done to it? Or should I keep my driivng limited before it's tuned and just drive it that day down to New Jersey? Thanks
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ridin98civic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you really wont find many people sporting 17's on their civic, i did when i first got it, but i have seen the light.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
wierd, i guess I never found the light...i did however find magazine features with my 17" wheels

</TD></TR></TABLE>
wierd, i guess I never found the light...i did however find magazine features with my 17" wheels

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GetawayInMoscow
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
80
Mar 31, 2020 08:09 PM






