GT42 Setup
im really not feeling the outlet end tank design...any particular reason you made a straight line from the top of the core down...i would have at least left a 1" to allow the flow in the top of the core out...as it sits not...its coming out of the core almost into a 80 degree wall <1" out of the core
nice looking set up your building there. do you have any pics of the manifold off of the car?
also it seems that there are more and more people using v-bands on the end tanks. is there any particular reason why? or is it because it's more baller than t-bolts? i was just curious because i thought that they had a tendency to leak.
also it seems that there are more and more people using v-bands on the end tanks. is there any particular reason why? or is it because it's more baller than t-bolts? i was just curious because i thought that they had a tendency to leak.
All the v-bands on the ic pipes are machined and fitted w/ rubber o-rings.
Reasons of design is its avery large core and fitment w/ a stock bumper cover. Wether or not adding 1" to the top of the end tank would have made a flow difference, that we dont know, but if it prohibits the bumper cover fitment then it does no good.
Reasons of design is its avery large core and fitment w/ a stock bumper cover. Wether or not adding 1" to the top of the end tank would have made a flow difference, that we dont know, but if it prohibits the bumper cover fitment then it does no good.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by PSI2HI »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> Reasons of design is its avery large core and fitment w/ a stock bumper cover. Wether or not adding 1" to the top of the end tank would have made a flow difference, that we dont know, but if it prohibits the bumper cover fitment then it does no good.</TD></TR></TABLE>
then why run such a huge *** core...cut it down an inch and make it useable...imho the top 1-2" of that core is useless....but nice fab'n skills too
then why run such a huge *** core...cut it down an inch and make it useable...imho the top 1-2" of that core is useless....but nice fab'n skills too
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by PSI2HI »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">\Reasons of design is its avery large core and fitment w/ a stock bumper cover. Wether or not adding 1" to the top of the end tank would have made a flow difference, that we dont know, but if it prohibits the bumper cover fitment then it does no good.</TD></TR></TABLE>
with that being said.... i noticed the intercooler isnt exactly "centerd" on the front of the car, but the driver side end tank has no clearance issue, like you are suggesting the passenger side has ?
with that being said.... i noticed the intercooler isnt exactly "centerd" on the front of the car, but the driver side end tank has no clearance issue, like you are suggesting the passenger side has ?
The passenger side doesn't have any clearance issues, what he was referring to was bringing the endtank out flat a few extra inches @ the top on the passenger side which would have created a clearance issue.
to clarify w/ ms paint ftw!
here is what he has currently

see where the arrow is...the flow path (green) is restricted by the outlet area (yellow) near the top of the core...therfore making the top of the core less efficent
here is what is imho a better design that would allow full use of the whole core by adding a lil bit of lenght the flow thru the entire core is allowed to pass through and we see the eddy currents of the flow hittin the walls and start to get turbulent

ideally a radiused exit would be better than a boxed endtank similar to that on joe simspons car like tony made to smooth out the charge w/ minimal eddy currents to increase the efficency of the system
and i would also sacrifice a 1" on the compressor side also to allow the same thing...if the air cant flow well w/o restriction to the entire core...whats the sense in using such a large core to begin w/....
here is what he has currently

see where the arrow is...the flow path (green) is restricted by the outlet area (yellow) near the top of the core...therfore making the top of the core less efficent
here is what is imho a better design that would allow full use of the whole core by adding a lil bit of lenght the flow thru the entire core is allowed to pass through and we see the eddy currents of the flow hittin the walls and start to get turbulent

ideally a radiused exit would be better than a boxed endtank similar to that on joe simspons car like tony made to smooth out the charge w/ minimal eddy currents to increase the efficency of the system
and i would also sacrifice a 1" on the compressor side also to allow the same thing...if the air cant flow well w/o restriction to the entire core...whats the sense in using such a large core to begin w/....
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by c-techracing »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">could u "sketch out" a radius exit. Hmm does any1 have pix of joe simpsons i/c? </TD></TR></TABLE>
ill get you some pics of eddy currents...check out the are website...basically ic comes off an 1' or so and then tappers at a changing slope to smooth the airflow exiting the core to the outlet
ill get you some pics of eddy currents...check out the are website...basically ic comes off an 1' or so and then tappers at a changing slope to smooth the airflow exiting the core to the outlet
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by c-techracing »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">could u "sketch out" a radius exit. Hmm does any1 have pix of joe simpsons i/c? </TD></TR></TABLE>
http://www.t1racedevelopment.com/index-1.html
click on the blue civic at the top right(Allen S) same intercooler design
http://www.t1racedevelopment.com/index-1.html
click on the blue civic at the top right(Allen S) same intercooler design
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
*Boostwerks*
Forced Induction
55
Aug 10, 2007 12:14 PM
ScrapinSi
Forced Induction
41
Sep 24, 2003 04:19 PM



(im kidding)
