Modified by hondafiendh22 at 10:12 AM 5/18/2007

 

get rid of that jun ecu, get a better program, also those injectors should be fine for that power your trying to make..

 

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by audiokarate &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well my friend just dynoed his car at Church Automotive. If I am correct this is equivilent to flywheel HP? </TD></TR></TABLE>
The Dynapack reads power at the hubs. Your flywheel HP will be ~25HP more on a FWD vehicle. Unless the car was running out of fuel, you don't need bigger injectors. At that power level, stock injectors should be o.k.

 

Posting the graph would help us all see exactly where the build needs attention.

 

let me know what you think is the problem i am the guy with the b20 problem

 

No VTEC?
Motor going south?

 

AGREE, WITH THOSE CAMS YOU NEED SOME SERIOUS TUNING TO GET GOOD HEIGHT ON THE POWER BAR, CREATE A NEW BASE MAP AND TUNE FROM THERE.

 

i'm just guessing here but does your friend still have the stock fuel pump?? i'd suggest getting a walbro 190lph just to be sure the engine is getting enough fuel.

 

yeah

 

If the motor was running out of fuel it would show up on the air fuel graph.

 

I'm almost thinking it might be Overkill. What size TB?

I would definitely get on some 310cc injectors.

But it just seems like the S2S2's are too much for that build... but that's me!?!

 

THERE IS NO FUEL PROBLEM.

Stop suggesting he get larger injector's and higher flow fuel pump's.

This is a case of a thrown together engine setup with no proper tuning.

for an undesigned engine and a genric ecu program his number's seem fine imo. Not to mention he is probably in the region of 7-1 dynamic compression ratio.

chip your ecu with crome,uberdata,hondata whatever really. And then drop your car back off at churches and tell him them to tune it.

this will give you some result's, and the peace of mind knowing your engine is'nt a time bomb.

 

 

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LG_R32 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">THERE IS NO FUEL PROBLEM.

Stop suggesting he get larger injector's and higher flow fuel pump's.

This is a case of a thrown together engine setup with no proper tuning.

for an undesigned engine and a genric ecu program his number's seem fine imo. Not to mention he is probably in the region of 7-1 dynamic compression ratio.

chip your ecu with crome,uberdata,hondata whatever really. And then drop your car back off at churches and tell him them to tune it.

this will give you some result's, and the peace of mind knowing your engine is'nt a time bomb. </TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah, start with that lovely low 8.8:1 compression.

 

hondata and new pistons in that block and he will be over 200 whp/hhp

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by brmiddle &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
yeah, start with that lovely low 8.8:1 compression.</TD></TR></TABLE>

WTH?? WTF?!?!?! 8.8:1??? that's perfect for a turbo setup!!!

 

b-20's have less webbing in the block and are
prone to the piston walls cracking under boost
a b20 is great for a all motor vtec monster good luck with your build

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by featherwieght &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">b-20's have less webbing in the block and are
prone to the piston walls cracking under boost
a b20 is great for a all motor vtec monster good luck with your build </TD></TR></TABLE>



b20 sleeves crack because of detonation

 

^and twisting^. I think those cams might be to big for the low compression your pistons produce. Get rid of the JUN chip and go with something like crome.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by smileycvc &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">^and twisting^. I think those cams might be to big for the low compression your pistons produce. Get rid of the JUN chip and go with something like crome. </TD></TR></TABLE>

 

I'm not a fan of this,(I'm with the majority on this one) CTR N1 Crank Pulley

 

What would his C/R be with that head on there. It should bump it at least to over 9.0:1. I mean, its not much, but is something. Shave the deck, head, get flat faced valves, thinner HG. There's lots of ways to get that C/R up to something respectable without dropping a ****-ton of money on pistons, rings, bearings, rod bolts, shotpeening, and so-on. What do you guys think?

 

big cams lower your static compression ratio. why put big *** cams on an 8.8 motor?not over 9.2 with that head, thats still low compression. needs to swap those pistons out.