http://www.intrinsicperformance.com/default.html

January 23, 2007

IPS-K2 8620 produces highest output on internally stock K20A ever recorded at
Church Automotive Testing's Dynapack 4000!



Engine Setup:

*JDM K20A
*SSR header
*PRC vs. RBC intake manifold
*CAI with Prototype Racing Velocity stack
*91 octane
*Hondata K-Pro

RBC = Blue
PRC = Yellow

Just wanted to share this with everyone!

-Jalal


Modified by MJ23FE at 6:42 PM 1/23/2007


Modified by MJ23FE at 6:42 PM 1/23/2007

 

congrads to mr. brendon i guess the RBC manifold does work after all

 

to the k
thats alot of torque for a 2.0

 

 

me like!

 

thats to the flywheel. why those everyone cut to tops of the dyno sheet out of the church dyno sheets... it says to the flywheel.. how do we know that dyno sheet is from chruch and from that car..?

 

Ips always using church's for dyno, beside i was info by the owner of this car who happen to used my manifold for the test

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Blueprint &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thats to the flywheel. why those everyone cut to tops of the dyno sheet out of the church dyno sheets... it says to the flywheel.. how do we know that dyno sheet is from chruch and from that car..? </TD></TR></TABLE>
http://www.intrinsicperformance.com/default.html

Read, dude. Read.

-Jalal


Modified by MJ23FE at 10:10 PM 1/23/2007

 

 

wonder what times it runs....good job

 

it this the manifold that they tested the oem civic one to?

 

i think b19coupe showed how big the throttle body opening was a while back
i think it was like 100 mm

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MJ23FE &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
http://www.intrinsicperformance.com/default.html

Read, dude. Read.

-Jalal


Modified by MJ23FE at 7:45 PM 1/23/2007</TD></TR></TABLE>

Dude you dont seem to understand... since people found out that church's dyno is to the flywheel they ahve been editing the top of the dyno sheet that says chruch dyno tunning and it states dyno is to the flywheel

let me find you a old dyno sheet posted that says it.. i just want people to understand that they are not going to get 270hp by putting on some ips product

 

270 whp on a stock engine (on porting or bottem end work)
is great either way

 

Well with ron'ss comparison to dynojets earlier in comparison to Chruch's dynapack he came out with this ratio :

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ron &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
- up to 200hp, the delta is ~10hp
- 200-220, the delta is ~10-15hp
- 220-240, the delta is ~15-20hp
- 240-260, the delta is ~20-25hp
- 260-280, the delta is ~25-30hp
- 280-300, the delta is ~30-35hp
</TD></TR></TABLE>

I swear i dont know how many times i've posted this up.

This motor would probably make something like 250ish whp dynojet IMO.

Although i dont quite think this works as well since i hear this new dynapack reads a tad lower. But regardless it gives you some idea of the difference.

 

amazing.
K's are the wave of the future.

 

what did the original k2's make on a k20a at church's

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by alterdcreations &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">270 whp on a stock engine (on porting or bottem end work)
is great either way </TD></TR></TABLE>

yeah thats the whole point its not 270whp

its 270 flywheel hp

 

sweet!

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Blueprint &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Dude you dont seem to understand... since people found out that church's dyno is to the flywheel they ahve been editing the top of the dyno sheet that says chruch dyno tunning and it states dyno is to the flywheel

let me find you a old dyno sheet posted that says it.. i just want people to understand that they are not going to get 270hp by putting on some ips product </TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Blueprint &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

yeah thats the whole point its not 270whp

its 270 flywheel hp </TD></TR></TABLE>
Have you ever seen a dynapack in person? Doesn't seem like you have. Dynapacks measure power to the hubs. It does not measure power from the flywheel. EVERY SINGLE DYNAPACK around the world as far as i've seen has the same print out and display screen that says flywheel hp.
Dynapacks measure hp at the hubs, not at the flywheel.
With that said, every dyno, whether it be dynapack, dynojet, mustang dyno, etc will read differently. No two dyno's will read identical.
Dyno's are a measuring tool, and a baseline is very important so that you can measure your progress as your car evolves with different parts, etc.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xtrafastcivic &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what did the original k2's make on a k20a at church's</TD></TR></TABLE>
Here is a dyno of IPS-K2 ductile iron cores VS IPS-K2 8620 cores



-Jalal


Modified by MJ23FE at 11:45 PM 1/23/2007

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by alterdcreations &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">it this the manifold that they tested the oem civic one to?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
No. The IPS Intake Manifold has not been brought into the equation whatsoever, thus far.

PRB = 02-06 USDM RSX Type-S Good
PRC = 01-06 JDM Integra Type R Better
RBC = 04-07 JDM Accord Euro R Best

The manifolds tested were the PRC vs. RBC, with the RBC being the higher number.

The IPS Intake Manifold is leaps and bounds better than anything else on the market, as far as intake manifolds go. Don't expect to see them for quite some time though.

-Jalal


Modified by MJ23FE at 11:46 PM 1/23/2007

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Blueprint &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah thats the whole point its not 270whp

its 270 flywheel hp </TD></TR></TABLE>

Like the OP said, its NOT flywheel. Although it can be fairly close to flywheel hp in some cases. This has been covered 384973593479475974 times.

Very impressive numbers

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Blueprint &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah thats the whole point its not 270whp

its 270 flywheel hp </TD></TR></TABLE>
It is NOT flywheel HP. Our dyno gives your HP at the hubs.
270 HP at the hubs is 240-250 Dynojet and ~295 at the flywheel.
270 on our dyno is still pretty damn good. Most all motor cars do not even come close to that number on our dyno. IPS cams are very good, as has been proved time and again. VTECKidd just did a dyno comparison of IPS cams vs Skunk cams, and the IPS cams proved to be quite good. Another thing that we saw in this test is that the RBC manifold is magnitudes better than the PRC intake manifold.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b19coupe &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
270 on our dyno is still pretty damn good. Most all motor cars do not even come close to that number on our dyno. IPS cams are very good, as has been proved time and again. VTECKidd just did a dyno </TD></TR></TABLE>

Im gonna shoot for getting close this Thurs, Todd. Ill be happy with 10-15hp off.

Great #'s, IPS

 

all I gotta say is dayam!!

mad props!! that's just amazing