Revo technica camber kit
has anyone tried this brand of control arm camber kit? Im thinking about picking one up to fix my negative camber problem after lowering
http://www.revotechnica.com/camber_kits.htm#
http://www.revotechnica.com/camber_kits.htm#
i got mine in the other day and they look pretty beefy...I guess...the only other brand ive tried is Omnipower for the DC/EG and I liked them...these look to be comparable.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EF_LSVtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Only problem I see with that product is if you actually want/need negative camber
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah, i would only get these if your really slammed and want something to keep a little neg camber for auto x and stuff. im looking into LCA'a for my crx to bring the camber from -3.5 deg to around -1.5-2.0 deg.
</TD></TR></TABLE>yeah, i would only get these if your really slammed and want something to keep a little neg camber for auto x and stuff. im looking into LCA'a for my crx to bring the camber from -3.5 deg to around -1.5-2.0 deg.
I modded mine so the hardware goes bottom-up. See my thread: https://honda-tech.com/zero...age=4. I should have the kit installed in a week or two.
I will post results.
I will post results.
i saw them at some website for something like $150
i did a google search.
thats a good price i just wanna know how they fit and if they make any kind of difference and whatnot
i did a google search.
thats a good price i just wanna know how they fit and if they make any kind of difference and whatnot
that is cheap considering visions and cuscos are around $400. I believe spl makes a ball joint that is adjustable that goes in your oem arm, but i'm farily confident that one hits as well
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EF_LSVtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Only problem I see with that product is if you actually want/need negative camber
</TD></TR></TABLE>
he's going to have negative camber, when he lowers his car, that he's trying to fix ahead of time with a camber kit.
</TD></TR></TABLE>he's going to have negative camber, when he lowers his car, that he's trying to fix ahead of time with a camber kit.
for those who have this camber kit. please post what you think about them. clearance issues, adjustment problems. etc.. It's hard finding a camber kit that is designed like the skunk2. where you adjust at the ball joint instead of the inside control arm like the ingalls. I was actualyl thinking about buying this kit too. so post up people! thanks
I've had the SPC balljoints, and now have the vision negative camber arms on my 89 hatch. The SPC's hit the upper shock tower, even without being that low. after I compared them to the vision arms, it is obvious why the SPC's hit.
The SPC ball joint itself is around an inch or so taller than the stock one, so it locates the A arm higher up in the shock tower. That's why it hits so easily. The vision arms use a standard factory style ball joint, and do not change the location of the front A arm, so they act like stock arms and don't hit.
the Revo arm balljoint looks similar to the factory one, so I don't think you will lose any clearance with them. And you can bottom out any A arm if you are too low and/or not running stiff enough springs.
The Revos look like a good affordable solution for those who just want to correct camber, but the lack of negative adjustment means that people who track their cars will still be looking for other alternatives. (I'm running -2.8 degrees with my vision arms)
here's a pic of the vision vs. stock w/ SPC balljoint. You can see why so many people have the arms hit the shock towers when running SPC's.
The SPC ball joint itself is around an inch or so taller than the stock one, so it locates the A arm higher up in the shock tower. That's why it hits so easily. The vision arms use a standard factory style ball joint, and do not change the location of the front A arm, so they act like stock arms and don't hit.
the Revo arm balljoint looks similar to the factory one, so I don't think you will lose any clearance with them. And you can bottom out any A arm if you are too low and/or not running stiff enough springs.
The Revos look like a good affordable solution for those who just want to correct camber, but the lack of negative adjustment means that people who track their cars will still be looking for other alternatives. (I'm running -2.8 degrees with my vision arms)
here's a pic of the vision vs. stock w/ SPC balljoint. You can see why so many people have the arms hit the shock towers when running SPC's.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by djphonics »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I modded mine so the hardware goes bottom-up. See my thread: https://honda-tech.com/zero...age=4. I should have the kit installed in a week or two.
I will post results.</TD></TR></TABLE>
for the results
I will post results.</TD></TR></TABLE>
for the results


