Did some work and hit the dyno
We recently swapped my ITR motor into my EG. The motor bone stock with a crap OBX 4-2-1 header only put down 154WHP and 123tq. Did some work and better numbers followed.
The set up....
98 spec JDM ITR complete swap
Skunk2 springs and retainers
Skunk2 stage2 cams (both gears set at 0)
DTR header
RC 440 injectors
Walbro pump
N1 crank pulley
Tuned on Hondata....for now. (I have AEM EMS but I need to get a harness)
Ended up making 195whp and 131tq
I dont have the graph handy but I'll work on posting it up later.


Modified by AddictiveAllMotor at 9:57 AM 12/14/2006
The set up....
98 spec JDM ITR complete swap
Skunk2 springs and retainers
Skunk2 stage2 cams (both gears set at 0)
DTR header
RC 440 injectors
Walbro pump
N1 crank pulley
Tuned on Hondata....for now. (I have AEM EMS but I need to get a harness)
Ended up making 195whp and 131tq
I dont have the graph handy but I'll work on posting it up later.


Modified by AddictiveAllMotor at 9:57 AM 12/14/2006
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EH3SiGRL »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">good numbers, and good luck with ur car!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks
Thanks
hmm...I made the same exact numbers with a poorman's R and only had stock injectors/fuel pump, profab header and tuned on a VAFC2...(along with the same mods you have that is)
Trending Topics
I dont believe you fool!! how did you gain 30 horses from doing just that.....hahaha J/K Nice work...great to see an R motor putting out that kind of power
Car looks too!!
Car looks too!!
my ride is currently down (i hooked a friend up with my jumper harness) for a couple of weeks while the new jumper is in the mail but then its on chicago
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by N_A_is_best »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">my ride is currently down (i hooked a friend up with my jumper harness) for a couple of weeks while the new jumper is in the mail but then its on chicago
</TD></TR></TABLE>
You know this!!
</TD></TR></TABLE>You know this!!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CRXsmoke »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wow, very impressive
I <3 allmotor hondas</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks, I'm pretty happy with picking up 41hp from those mods.
I <3 allmotor hondas</TD></TR></TABLE>Thanks, I'm pretty happy with picking up 41hp from those mods.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SkoundrelUSA »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hmm...I made the same exact numbers with a poorman's R and only had stock injectors/fuel pump, profab header and tuned on a VAFC2...(along with the same mods you have that is)</TD></TR></TABLE>
I cant keep scrolling this thread without replying to this comment.
I'm sure that a lot of other people have done better numbers with less work, but thats their motors, and their build. This is MY motor, with MY build, and I happen to be pretty happy with the numbers. So congrats on the numbers you made with that set up, sounds like you're proud of it.
Modified by AddictiveAllMotor at 7:07 AM 12/14/2006
I cant keep scrolling this thread without replying to this comment.
I'm sure that a lot of other people have done better numbers with less work, but thats their motors, and their build. This is MY motor, with MY build, and I happen to be pretty happy with the numbers. So congrats on the numbers you made with that set up, sounds like you're proud of it.
Modified by AddictiveAllMotor at 7:07 AM 12/14/2006
sorry, I wasn't trying to put down your numbers or anything like that. Just wanted to give an idea. Yours probably runs better than mine anyway lol
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by N_A_is_best »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">sadly chicago i have more done and the only thing i have on you is like 10 trq and 2 hp
but like we both know its all about the weight reduction</TD></TR></TABLE>
You've got me beat in the weight saving dept. I am coming up quick though
but like we both know its all about the weight reduction</TD></TR></TABLE>You've got me beat in the weight saving dept. I am coming up quick though
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDM_G2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">your stock numbers where pretty low in my opinion...154whp out of a JDM ITR its too low...congrats with the new results
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree, but I'm thinking that the junk header contributed to that in a big way. My stock numbers weren't with a ITR header.
</TD></TR></TABLE>I agree, but I'm thinking that the junk header contributed to that in a big way. My stock numbers weren't with a ITR header.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDM_G2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">your stock numbers where pretty low in my opinion...154whp out of a JDM ITR its too low...congrats with the new results
</TD></TR></TABLE>
every dyno reads different there bubb
but yeah, that sounds like a great improvment
</TD></TR></TABLE>every dyno reads different there bubb
but yeah, that sounds like a great improvment
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,091
Likes: 28
From: the internet and I WILL STEP ON YOU
41 whp is a significant improvement, and 195whp is damn quick in a hatchback
i love honda tech and how most people compare dyno numbers, its pretty rediculous.
i made 217whp with my fully built 2.1 RLZ motor. anyone wanna take a stab at making more with theirs on the same dyno?
i love honda tech and how most people compare dyno numbers, its pretty rediculous.
i made 217whp with my fully built 2.1 RLZ motor. anyone wanna take a stab at making more with theirs on the same dyno?




