All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

LOW NUMBERS.. any thoughts??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 10:41 PM
  #1  
CCD-R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Eastern, Wa, US
Default LOW NUMBERS.. any thoughts??

Hello Everyone,

First of all just wanted to say hi and that i am a new member to HT and love it thus so far..

Anyway to business... heres the story, ive been waiting 8 months for everything to come together after spinning a bearing on my mildly-built GSR. Everything finally fits together and the shop finishes the build heres the new setup...

Golden Eagle Block Sleeving 2.0L
Golden Eagle MFG 84mm Headgasket
Eagle Rods
Endyn 84mm Mid Comp Piston 12.5:1
Eagle OE Stroke Lightweight Crank
Type R Replica Port & Polish (3-Angle)
Skunk2 Stage II cams
Skunk2 Cam Gears
Crower Springs (Dual Spring)
Crower Retainers
Type R Valves
ARP Head Bolts
Energy Suspension Engine Mounts
AEM Cold air intake
Skunk2 Intake Manifold
JG Header
IPS Carsound Cat
5Zigen Exhaust
AEM Fuel Pressure Regulator
AEM Fuel Rail
Hondata S100
MSD Plug Wires
MSD Digital-6
MSD Blaster Coil
NGK Plugs
GSR Oil Pump
Aluminum Radiator

building my list i expected to see around the 210whp 230ft/lb tq area.. i get a call from shop to say its finished and show up to find a dyno sheet of 170whp 126tq...

shop claims my cat, 2.25" piping, cams being too small, and the aem ca intake are all the cause. I know very well that being naturally aspirated depends all on flow but does this and my s2s2's really result in the low dyno numbers? I already dumped the CA for a 3" shortram w/new filter.

I was just wondering if anyone could give some insight or share their thoughts on my situation. not saying 170/126 isnt fun to drive just 200+ sounds so much better!

Oh and get this, before i handed over the car to the shop my previous dyno sheet from a different shop was 182whp/121ft/lbs tq... 3 grand later, 12 less horsepower, doesnt seem right. Heres what i added on top of my old setup: GE block sleeving, oem bearings, endyn pistons 12.5:1 (previously 11.5:1 JE), eagle lightweight crank, and of course balance bore and hone.

Any thoughts are appreciated, and i give a pre-thank you to all who respond

Thanks again
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 07:48 AM
  #2  
LSracing94's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 2
From: budd lake, nj, usa
Default Re: LOW NUMBERS.. any thoughts?? (CCD-R)

get a new tuner lol
i really dunno what to tell you til we can see the dyno sheet man
just sounds like an extremly horrible tune, you should be seeing 200+ with out a doubt
i ran a similar setup with s2s2 and they werent too small.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 08:03 AM
  #3  
mgags7's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,050
Likes: 3
Default

well it does sound to me like the shop sucks, though a 2.25 inch exhaust is very small...
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 08:09 AM
  #4  
doood's Avatar
been there done that
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 11,885
Likes: 3
From: earth
Default Re: (bb4ever)

you need a new tuner. since you're in wa state try http://www.intecracing.com
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 08:23 AM
  #5  
Jasper_db1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 1
From: Aliso Viejo, Ca, USA
Default Re: LOW NUMBERS.. any thoughts?? (CCD-R)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CCD-R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">shop claims my cat, 2.25" piping, cams being too small, and the aem ca intake are all the cause. I know very well that being naturally aspirated depends all on flow but does this and my s2s2's really result in the low dyno numbers? I already dumped the CA for a 3" shortram w/new filter. </TD></TR></TABLE>

My setup ran low on the dyno too. I'm using an old DC 4-2-1 2" header with an even older Trust BL exhaust.

Simply installing a 3" intake netted 5whp.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 08:29 AM
  #6  
goforbroke's Avatar
MEAT PATTY
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,633
Likes: 2
From: White Suburbia, PA
Default Re: (that one doood)

That shop is telling you stories about you exhaust, even with a 2.25 you should be making more power then that. Their is nothing wrong with your cams either, they are more then aggressive enough to make more power then that. It would be helpful if you could post of your dyno sheet, is vtec engaging? I'm just looking at your torque and considering you have a 2.0 something is going on. I just wonder how well they built your motor if their telling you stories about your exhaust or cams. NEED TO SEE YOUR DYNO SHEET.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 08:42 AM
  #7  
Boots's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 0
From: JDM land, usa
Default Re: LOW NUMBERS.. any thoughts?? (CCD-R)

yea something is wrong...a gsr with a good amount of bolt ons can make that much
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 09:56 AM
  #8  
97L-esVeeTeg's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: The all motor Forum but my house is in, Iowa
Default Re: LOW NUMBERS.. any thoughts?? (CCD-R)

What are your leakdown and compression #'s
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 10:19 AM
  #9  
GSRCRXsi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Re: LOW NUMBERS.. any thoughts?? (97L-esVeeTeg)

and you'll never see 230ft/lb trq either.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 11:21 AM
  #10  
mgags7's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,050
Likes: 3
Default

I think he probably meant 130.....
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 03:23 PM
  #11  
CCD-R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Eastern, Wa, US
Default Re: (bb4ever)

Yes i did mean 130 ft/lb tq.. typo..

Anyway to answer a couple of questions..

Not to bash on my shop at all because i know they are very well renown and do nothing but quality builds, but it was built and tuned at intec racing in kent.. I will post the dyno sheet for all to see probably this evening when i get home, vtec engages but falls on its face!

Thanks everybody!
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 04:19 PM
  #12  
1 2 NV's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 0
From: retired 2/13/10
Default Re: LOW NUMBERS.. any thoughts?? (CCD-R)

sounds like a solid build, id expect to see 210/140 at least out of it. with some of their previous dyno #s they have posted with their own cars id suspect something other than exhaust and intake issues. skunk stage 2 cams are not as aggressive as current cams but they are still no joke.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 05:00 PM
  #13  
slowsleeper's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 0
Default Re: LOW NUMBERS.. any thoughts?? (CCD-R)

the numbers are a bit low for a 2.0 they seem more like a 1.8 than a 2.0...do a compression and leakdown and go from there..
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 05:19 PM
  #14  
chris2000's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Default Re: (CCD-R)

i agree with the rest and feel its rather low..

My stock block B18C5 with ported head with bolt-ons like BC3+ cams + Omni valvetrain + DC JDM 4-1 + J's 60mm race exhaust gave me 184whp and 127ftlbs

I think in H-t, most 2L will net above 200whp and 135ftlbs
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 06:33 PM
  #15  
OH_1fstgsr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Dublin, OH, USA
Default Re: (chris2000)

What about all the ignition stuff?
MSD Plug Wires
MSD Digital-6
MSD Blaster Coil
Most Honda's due just fine with stock.
Are you able to get a dyno with the Air/Fuel Ratio on it?
Another thought, is your VTEC working correctly?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 07:08 PM
  #16  
Combustion Contraption's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
Default

What sort of dyno was this on?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 10:54 PM
  #17  
1 2 NV's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 0
From: retired 2/13/10
Default Re: (Combustion Contraption)

i believe its the standard dynojet 248c.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 11:00 PM
  #18  
mgags7's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,050
Likes: 3
Default

well put the exhaust thing this way....if you really choke it up it isnt a matter of just not making good power, it actually backs up **** in the exhaust system and chokes the engine....

My car for example, 195whp h22....I have an electric cutout, when open, the car rips to redline smoothly.....with the cutout closed, choking through a 2.25 inch cat and exhaust, the car runs fine until vtec, then falls on its face, sometime even bucks a little if i try to take it above 6k....

Tell them to try dynoing it open header and see what happens....its only a few bolts and it can't hurt....
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 11:02 PM
  #19  
1 2 NV's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 0
From: retired 2/13/10
Default Re: (bb4ever)

apples to oranges. you have bigger displacement and a better flowing head in an H22.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 11:31 AM
  #20  
Boots's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 0
From: JDM land, usa
Default Re: (bb4ever)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bb4ever &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well put the exhaust thing this way....if you really choke it up it isnt a matter of just not making good power, it actually backs up **** in the exhaust system and chokes the engine....

My car for example, 195whp h22....I have an electric cutout, when open, the car rips to redline smoothly.....with the cutout closed, choking through a 2.25 inch cat and exhaust, the car runs fine until vtec, then falls on its face, sometime even bucks a little if i try to take it above 6k....

Tell them to try dynoing it open header and see what happens....its only a few bolts and it can't hurt....</TD></TR></TABLE>

it could actually burn the valves up
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 11:48 AM
  #21  
GSRCRXsi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Re: (boots)

no it cant, lol. lots of guys run open header especially for racing, like side exits, they are fine.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 11:55 AM
  #22  
Boots's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 0
From: JDM land, usa
Default Re: (GSRCRXsi)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GSRCRXsi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">no it cant, lol. lots of guys run open header especially for racing, like side exits, they are fine.</TD></TR></TABLE>

i was always told running open header with oem valves could burn them up...i dunno
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 05:00 PM
  #23  
Combustion Contraption's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
Default

wives tales.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 05:02 PM
  #24  
mgags7's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,050
Likes: 3
Default Re: (boots)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boots &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

it could actually burn the valves up</TD></TR></TABLE>

it would take one horrible tune to burn a valve like that, open header or not...

now starting the engine with no header on there at all is another thing, that could easily burn a valve
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 05:11 PM
  #25  
doood's Avatar
been there done that
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 11,885
Likes: 3
From: earth
Default Re: (bb4ever)

what exactly happens when you burn a valve? does the valve actually burn?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 PM.