Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

GSR HEAD on B16 BLOCK?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 09:28 PM
  #1  
toekneexD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Default GSR HEAD on B16 BLOCK?

alright.. so i searched... and i came up with only the opposite combo (b16 head on gsr block) soo here it is... im looking at a 95 integra with 00 front end.. its orginally a gsr but i guess he blew the block... but anyways he replaced it with a b16 block and it has the original head/tranny... so would this set up be slower than a stock gsr/si motor w/ same mods (i/h/e)? any input would be great... thanksss

p.s. sorry if its been covered.. point me in the right direction cause i can't find it

tony
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 09:40 PM
  #2  
97itypeR's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default

wouldnt it be slower because the b16 block cant rev as high as a GSR? idunno, never herd of this conversion because its always all about LS block/B16head LSV combos. but...

bump for info
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 11:48 PM
  #3  
jarel's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,501
Likes: 0
From: Angeles Crest, so cal
Default

i've seen it done before, as for more, i dunno. but i wouldn't buy a car w/ a mix-matched motor. thats just me. Because you dunno where he got the B16 block from.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 11:52 PM
  #4  
BlueIntegraBoy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23,967
Likes: 9
From: Las Vegas
Default Re: (97itypeR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 97itypeR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wouldnt it be slower because the b16 block cant rev as high as a GSR?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Nope, if anything the B16 can take a little more revving than the GSR. Both have the same redline.

The car is definitely going to be slower than a stock GSR because there's less torque and the tranny isn't geared for the torque deficiency.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 01:51 AM
  #5  
martyball619's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: san diego ca
Default Re: (BlueIntegraBoy)

it wouldnt work well that way.. b16 blocks are whack. " there is no replacement for displacement" it's torqueless
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 09:16 AM
  #6  
toekneexD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Default Re: (DC2SiR)

the car is from my brothers girlfriends little brother.. soo i know what its been through... he works at a lexus dealer and knows alot about hondas... the reason he did it is cause he needed a running car and just threw something together...but would this be slower than a regular si motor? bump for any info

tony
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 09:21 AM
  #7  
95 integra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,952
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham, AL
Default Re: (toekneexD)

It'd be about the same as a regular SI motor. Same amount of torque and roughly the same hp. The heads and IMs are different but really dont make all that much difference in power.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 12:49 PM
  #8  
gsR_Ace20's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: 505, u.s.a.
Default

yup the motor should have close to the same power as an si but as far as running up against another gsR or even an si forget about it the power won't be enough to haul the weight of the integra seeing as how civics weigh less i say throw in a b18c1
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 08:27 PM
  #9  
Ruben19's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 0
From: Panama, Panama
Default

i did this set up with my db8
b16a2block with gsr head and tranny.
hella slow. im getting my ecu chip this week.
I threw the gsr block on my 00 em1.(now is a poor man type r)
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 09:01 PM
  #10  
TypeRider98's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: homebase610, Pa, United States
Default Re: (Ruben19)

my friend's has that combo in an eg civic and it moves it's weight real good, but i agree that a c1 block would be better suited in an integra. whats he asking for the car anyway, it all depends on the price and condition of the car.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 09:44 PM
  #11  
slow_ls's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA, Kern
Default

It's is undoubtly going to have less power and probably be a fairly slow car really.
GSR block&gt; SI block; GSR head&lt; SI head. So as you can see it is totally *** backwards set up.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 11:06 AM
  #12  
97itypeR's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: socal
Default

learn something about hondas everyday :]
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 04:20 PM
  #13  
TypeRider98's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: homebase610, Pa, United States
Default Re: (97itypeR)

agreed that it will be slower than a gsr but the si head isn't always the better head. i'm sure i don't need to explain why.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 04:43 PM
  #14  
95 integra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,952
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham, AL
Default Re: (TypeRider98)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TypeRider98 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">agreed that it will be slower than a gsr but the si head isn't always the better head. i'm sure i don't need to explain why. </TD></TR></TABLE>


Yea, I struggle everyday to understand why everybody always says the SI head is better. The flow tests have been shown time and time again and the air flow is nearly identical on both heads. How and why is the SI better?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #15  
white ex's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: NY, ny, usa
Default Re: (95 integra)

i think the reason people believe that the b16 head is better is because honda used that casting for the type-r, so people just automatically assume it's better.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 07:03 PM
  #16  
aaronISthrowed's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx, US
Default Re: (white ex)

There was a thread that compared both the si head and gsr head on a ls block. Gsr head accually made more power
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 07:17 PM
  #17  
95dc2teg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Venice, Florida, US of A
Default Re: (aaronISthrowed)

no ****, i definately thought the b16 head was better. crazy ****
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 07:23 PM
  #18  
aaronISthrowed's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx, US
Default Re: (95dc2teg)

I wish i could find the thread.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 07:59 PM
  #19  
95 integra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,952
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham, AL
Default Re: (white ex)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by white ex &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i think the reason people believe that the b16 head is better is because honda used that casting for the type-r, so people just automatically assume it's better.</TD></TR></TABLE>


Oh sizzle......the "Type R." I find it funny because if you actually look at ALL of the upgrades honda did (P&P, cams, valvesprings, valves, raised compression, intake manifold, redesigned/modified intake, header, exhaust, etc) and they got 25hp at the crank. Then people magically think the cams are going to add 25hp to their car......**** trips me out every time.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kaneboi
Acura Integra
4
Aug 1, 2010 01:49 PM
opiumdaze
Acura Integra
1
Apr 18, 2005 07:17 PM
this name is gone
Tech / Misc
2
Nov 9, 2004 01:22 PM
EFin' Kyle
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
4
Aug 2, 2004 03:48 PM
Littletrim7
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
1
Sep 23, 2003 09:06 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:40 PM.