Dynoed my car today.
Car: 94 GSR 140,000 miles
Mods: 6 month old K&N drop in (e2427)

First pull 151.3 hp 118.4 ft-lbs
Second pull 149.4 hp 117.0 ft-lbs

i'll post the plot tomorrow.

edit: here's the dyno plot




[Modified by Mt3c, 4:29 PM 5/8/2002]

 

strong numbers= . stock GSRs usually put out a little less than that .

 

Damn my car is weak.

Nice numbers, especially with 140k miles.

 

Anybody else wanna post their stock dyno numbers? I want to run a quick statistical test on the numbers and see what the average and distribution are like. I need a lot of sample data to make this as accurate as possible.

Thanks

 

got a 94 b18c1 in my 00 si...engine/trans
peak numbers were 163.5 hp at redline and 113.6 tq 62-6300
my guess tq is low due to the TB

i/h/e skunk 2 manifold...bbk 70mm tb...vafc...fpr...type r flywheel

 

The 94 and 95's seem to be a little stronger on the dyno,due to them being OBD1.

 

sorry about my above post..mislooked the stock part...


[Modified by Y2K Si FBP, 4:48 PM 5/8/2002]

 

We could put that to the test, but it would require a lot of input from a lot of people.

We could get a bunch of stock OBD-I and OBD-II Integra GS-R's (or Civic's with the same engine) to put down some stock numbers, and compare the two distributions to see if they really are different or the same.

The problem is getting enough usable sample data. About 100% of the population here is modded, and even if we were to compare similar mods, we'd have to make a few exceptions and assumptions here and there to make the comparison a fair test.

To make it work, I would need at least 30 runs from an OBD-I GS-R group, and at least 30 people from an OBD-II GS-R group. All cars at the time of the dyno, need to be completely stock. Included with that, I'd need to know mileage @ the time of the run, environmental conditions (altitude, humidity), the dyno's geographical location, gear you ran it in, and what the ignition timing was if you changed it.

 

i did 147 not sae corrcted with a 95 that had 115 000 kilometers on it....

just got off dyno yesterday.....itr cams cam gear,IM, I/H/E, hondatat stage 2 and i hit 170 WHP not sae corrected,,,,,,,

242 with a 75 shot

 

I will tell you this much,I had to put my OBD11 ecu back in for inspection,and I could feel the difference.I know that ECU produces more power,not too much but I believe about 4 to 7 WHP,I will test this theory on the dyno when I get a couple more odds and ends for the car.

 

My friend's 2k1 GSR with I/H/E pulleys and juice put down 152whp and 119lbs torque.

AEM Intake, AEM rail, AEM regulator, AEM pulleys. GReddy headers. Apex-i Catback. Zex 55 shot.


[Modified by Chief Indica, 3:40 PM 5/9/2002]

 

152whp with juice?Most 94 95 gsr's produce 140 to 150 WHP in stock form.Most 98+GSR's run from 133WHP to 140WHP,on the average.Of course some are stronger than others but from what I've seen the 95's are less restricted.And my car runs noticably better with the obd1 computer.I think the 95 is better stock and responds a little better to headers and exhaust due to not having that extra 02 on the cat.And is better to chip.If you guys also noticed,from 94 to 2k the magazine times keep getting lower,example car and driver claims a 15.1 in 95 then claims a 15.7 in 2k?And I've also seen better dyno charts on 95's.Its not like your gonna go and **** on a vette by changing the computer,but it does make a slight difference.

 

plot is up

 

check out my webpage (in my signature) for my dyno plots

 

Not bad,but there is no doubt in my mind that 0bd1 is less restricted.And yields a few more ponies.