Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

Skunk2 intake manifold with p72

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2002 | 10:39 PM
  #1  
CM-R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: NOR CAL, US
Default Skunk2 intake manifold with p72

So guys is it bad to have this combo....cause i heard from somewhere and it was dyno proven that i would lose 10 hp if the secondary butterfly doesnt open up....but i have a skunk2 intake mani so my my secondaries are gone correct??...so would this effect my 97 p72 ecu and cause it to lose 10 hp??
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2002 | 11:27 PM
  #2  
CM-R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: NOR CAL, US
Default Re: Skunk2 intake manifold with p72 (CM-R)

So does anybody know?
Reply
Old May 1, 2002 | 04:19 AM
  #3  
MrFatBooty's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI, USA
Default Re: Skunk2 intake manifold with p72 (CM-R)

The secondary runners are built into the stock GSR manifold. They are vacuum operated. The ECU has no clue whether the secondaries are there or not. The one caveat is that the stock program dumps in a bunch of fuel at the RPM when the secondaries are supposed to open. With a non-variable manifold there are no secondaries so you run rich for a bit and get a flat spot in the power curve. Not a major issue. If it's bothering you the flat spot can be found on a dyno and then tuned out with a V-AFC .
Reply
Old May 1, 2002 | 10:03 AM
  #4  
CM-R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: NOR CAL, US
Default Re: Skunk2 intake manifold with p72 (MrFatBooty)

There is no lose in hp in tq with this flat spot is there??...cause i'm thinking about just getting a 97 itr ecu instead.....
Reply
Old May 1, 2002 | 10:30 AM
  #5  
MrFatBooty's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI, USA
Default Re: Skunk2 intake manifold with p72 (CM-R)

You won't loose like 10 whp where the GSR ECU dumps in the fuel for when it thinks the secondaries are kicking in. If you were looking at a dyno graph you'd see a part where the plot flattens out a tad, that's it.

'97 ITR ECU would be a good choice. Either way you still want to tune with a V-AFC since you don't have a B18C5.
Reply
Old May 1, 2002 | 11:40 AM
  #6  
CM-R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: NOR CAL, US
Default Re: Skunk2 intake manifold with p72 (MrFatBooty)

Ok i got it now...thanks for the help
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FF for Life
Acura Integra
9
Aug 19, 2011 10:42 AM
nuklang
Acura Integra
4
Oct 4, 2006 09:57 AM
strils
Acura Integra
2
Oct 6, 2002 05:49 AM
IC x Prince
Acura Integra
18
May 24, 2002 06:57 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:39 AM.