can't use ingalls camber kit for 1990 DA integra??? also...rubber or poly bushings for ingalls?
ok well i was on the ingalls web page and the only list the ingalls camber kit for 94-01 integras...but at summitracing.com the application says it will work for 90-01 integras...
can anyone chim in and let me know if its ok to use them on my 1990 integ? also..i noticed the same camber kit but one has polyurethane bushing and one has rubber-any pro's or con's for both? i was searching here on h-t and a lot people complain about the polyurethany bushings and how they are really really squiky. how about the rubber ones? ok thanks guys!
can anyone chim in and let me know if its ok to use them on my 1990 integ? also..i noticed the same camber kit but one has polyurethane bushing and one has rubber-any pro's or con's for both? i was searching here on h-t and a lot people complain about the polyurethany bushings and how they are really really squiky. how about the rubber ones? ok thanks guys!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 600_Double_R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ok well i was on the ingalls web page and the only list the ingalls camber kit for 94-01 integras...but at summitracing.com the application says it will work for 90-01 integras...
can anyone chim in and let me know if its ok to use them on my 1990 integ? also..i noticed the same camber kit but one has polyurethane bushing and one has rubber-any pro's or con's for both? i was searching here on h-t and a lot people complain about the polyurethany bushings and how they are really really squiky. how about the rubber ones? ok thanks guys! </TD></TR></TABLE>
I took my poly bushings off, they made soo much noise for street use.
I also took them off because adjusting them in caused the UCA to hit the chassis before the adjuster maxed out on one side. This left me with 0* caster (instead of the factory spec of 1*), and the only way to get the caster back was to reduce the static camber. My eventual solution was to just get a set of SPC UCAs, and while they do force me to run at a higher ride height, I can finally get to the level of camber I wanted.
So, if you're asking for a street car, then I'd recommend just getting the toe set after lowering, and enjoying the increased camber. If you're buying the set to get more camber than just lowering will provide, and if you're willing to grind the UCAs or bang out the wheel well a little, then they should work fine.
can anyone chim in and let me know if its ok to use them on my 1990 integ? also..i noticed the same camber kit but one has polyurethane bushing and one has rubber-any pro's or con's for both? i was searching here on h-t and a lot people complain about the polyurethany bushings and how they are really really squiky. how about the rubber ones? ok thanks guys! </TD></TR></TABLE>
I took my poly bushings off, they made soo much noise for street use.
I also took them off because adjusting them in caused the UCA to hit the chassis before the adjuster maxed out on one side. This left me with 0* caster (instead of the factory spec of 1*), and the only way to get the caster back was to reduce the static camber. My eventual solution was to just get a set of SPC UCAs, and while they do force me to run at a higher ride height, I can finally get to the level of camber I wanted.
So, if you're asking for a street car, then I'd recommend just getting the toe set after lowering, and enjoying the increased camber. If you're buying the set to get more camber than just lowering will provide, and if you're willing to grind the UCAs or bang out the wheel well a little, then they should work fine.
I had a set of these on the front of my last DA and they make a lot of noise I could not stand how much noise they make. I'm going with a full upper arm that has the camber control on it. I think it is made by SPC.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
E-lude78
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
11
Oct 20, 2003 07:21 PM




