Does the LS motor have anything over the GSR motor?
Displacement:
LS: 1834 cc
GSR: 1797 cc
Torque:
LS: 127@5000
GSR: 128 @ 6000
Bore x Stroke ( in.)
LS: 3.19x3.50
GSR: 3.19x3.43.
As you can see the LS's torue comes on sooner. That and the wider bore are the only advantages. The B18b is also a prime candidate for boosting, due to the 9.2: 1 CR compared with a GSRs 10.0:1.
LS: 1834 cc
GSR: 1797 cc
Torque:
LS: 127@5000
GSR: 128 @ 6000
Bore x Stroke ( in.)
LS: 3.19x3.50
GSR: 3.19x3.43.
As you can see the LS's torue comes on sooner. That and the wider bore are the only advantages. The B18b is also a prime candidate for boosting, due to the 9.2: 1 CR compared with a GSRs 10.0:1.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by shutupnskate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Displacement:
LS: 1834 cc
GSR: 1797 cc
Torque:
LS: 127@5000
GSR: 128 @ 6000
Bore x Stroke ( in.)
LS: 3.19x3.50
GSR: 3.19x3.43.
As you can see the LS's torue comes on sooner. That and the wider bore are the only advantages. The B18b is also a prime candidate for boosting, due to the 9.2: 1 CR compared with a GSRs 10.0:1.</TD></TR></TABLE>
yea what he said
LS: 1834 cc
GSR: 1797 cc
Torque:
LS: 127@5000
GSR: 128 @ 6000
Bore x Stroke ( in.)
LS: 3.19x3.50
GSR: 3.19x3.43.
As you can see the LS's torue comes on sooner. That and the wider bore are the only advantages. The B18b is also a prime candidate for boosting, due to the 9.2: 1 CR compared with a GSRs 10.0:1.</TD></TR></TABLE>
yea what he said
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by -Darren- »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ls=regular gas(cheap stuff)
gsr=premium gas(expensive stuff)
</TD></TR></TABLE>
which one eats more gas, or gets more mpg?
gsr=premium gas(expensive stuff)
</TD></TR></TABLE>
which one eats more gas, or gets more mpg?
Trending Topics
Both motors have their benefits, but depends on what you want.
In an integra the GSR is a nice combination but if your looking to swap motors in another platform such as a hatchback an LS with a shorter geared tranny is an excellent combination for a daily driver, lots of power down low and fun to drive, cheap gas and inexpensive swap.
In an integra the GSR is a nice combination but if your looking to swap motors in another platform such as a hatchback an LS with a shorter geared tranny is an excellent combination for a daily driver, lots of power down low and fun to drive, cheap gas and inexpensive swap.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by the_grinder »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Both motors have their benefits, but depends on what you want.
In an integra the GSR is a nice combination but if your looking to swap motors in another platform such as a hatchback an LS with a shorter geared tranny is an excellent combination for a daily driver, lots of power down low and fun to drive, cheap gas and inexpensive swap.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Around how much cheaper would you say an ls swap would be compared to a gsr?
In an integra the GSR is a nice combination but if your looking to swap motors in another platform such as a hatchback an LS with a shorter geared tranny is an excellent combination for a daily driver, lots of power down low and fun to drive, cheap gas and inexpensive swap.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Around how much cheaper would you say an ls swap would be compared to a gsr?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nelsmar »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">LS = longer stroke, not wider bore
</TD></TR></TABLE>
thank you. just has a longer stroke which = more displacement and more torque.
</TD></TR></TABLE>thank you. just has a longer stroke which = more displacement and more torque.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Solscud007 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">while I dont know about the LS. my GSR gets about 300 per tank and that is like 12.5 gallons?</TD></TR></TABLE>
12.5? No way. I am 10% from Empty, go to a gas station and fill it up, the pump stops at 9.0 gallons. I got 25/28mpg
12.5? No way. I am 10% from Empty, go to a gas station and fill it up, the pump stops at 9.0 gallons. I got 25/28mpg
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by crx_0_o »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Any advantages at all? Just curious.</TD></TR></TABLE>
uh. except cheaper gas...not really. Probably easier to install a blower.
uh. except cheaper gas...not really. Probably easier to install a blower.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JCushing »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">theres a reason the gsr motor costs about 3 times what a LS motor does...
</TD></TR></TABLE>
are you gonna make me guess the reason
</TD></TR></TABLE>
are you gonna make me guess the reason
i wasnt counting the tranny...
why would you need to guess... every part of the gsr motor is better down to the webbing on the block... end of story...
negative part is they cost more.....
why would you need to guess... every part of the gsr motor is better down to the webbing on the block... end of story...
negative part is they cost more.....
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by chAse22 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">bragging rights when you spank a gsR... i'm all for the underdog in a race...
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Its what I live for dude, i/h/e b16 tranny in a ls and u be at gsr's. I enjoy my ls, and i **** on a bunch of people alot of kids with there 30k auto cars.
there both good motors but when my ls hits 100k im going to gsr motor then well be in buisness, Gsr motor wit a b16 tranny
</TD></TR></TABLE>Its what I live for dude, i/h/e b16 tranny in a ls and u be at gsr's. I enjoy my ls, and i **** on a bunch of people alot of kids with there 30k auto cars.
there both good motors but when my ls hits 100k im going to gsr motor then well be in buisness, Gsr motor wit a b16 tranny
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hondacuraLs »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Its what I live for dude, i/h/e b16 tranny in a ls and u be at gsr's. I enjoy my ls, and i **** on a bunch of people alot of kids with there 30k auto cars.
there both good motors but when my ls hits 100k im going to gsr motor then well be in buisness, Gsr motor wit a b16 tranny
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Why not just rebuild the ls, up the CR to like 12.5ish and throw really aggressive cams in? That way you can still stay the underdog, and continue to smoke everyone with your nonvtec power.
Its what I live for dude, i/h/e b16 tranny in a ls and u be at gsr's. I enjoy my ls, and i **** on a bunch of people alot of kids with there 30k auto cars.
there both good motors but when my ls hits 100k im going to gsr motor then well be in buisness, Gsr motor wit a b16 tranny
</TD></TR></TABLE>Why not just rebuild the ls, up the CR to like 12.5ish and throw really aggressive cams in? That way you can still stay the underdog, and continue to smoke everyone with your nonvtec power.
this should clear up the gas tank size 
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acura_Integra »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Third generation
Production: 1994–2001
Body style: 3-door hatchback
4-door sedan
Engine: 1.8L 140 hp I4 (RS/LS/GS)
1.8L 170 hp I4 (GS-R)
1.8L 195 hp I4 (Type-R)
Transmission: 4-Speed Automatic Overdrive
5-Speed Manual Overdrive
Wheelbase: 101.20 in. (coupe)
103.1 in. (sedan)
Length: 172.40 in. (coupe)
178.1 in. (sedan)
Width: 67.3 in.
Height: 52.6 in. (coupe)
53.9 in. (sedan)
[b]Fuel capacity: <U>13.2</U> gal.[b]</TD></TR></TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acura_Integra »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Third generation
Production: 1994–2001
Body style: 3-door hatchback
4-door sedan
Engine: 1.8L 140 hp I4 (RS/LS/GS)
1.8L 170 hp I4 (GS-R)
1.8L 195 hp I4 (Type-R)
Transmission: 4-Speed Automatic Overdrive
5-Speed Manual Overdrive
Wheelbase: 101.20 in. (coupe)
103.1 in. (sedan)
Length: 172.40 in. (coupe)
178.1 in. (sedan)
Width: 67.3 in.
Height: 52.6 in. (coupe)
53.9 in. (sedan)
[b]Fuel capacity: <U>13.2</U> gal.[b]</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by justin.parker »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Why not just rebuild the ls, up the CR to like 12.5ish and throw really aggressive cams in? That way you can still stay the underdog, and continue to smoke everyone with your nonvtec power.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i want v tec man
Why not just rebuild the ls, up the CR to like 12.5ish and throw really aggressive cams in? That way you can still stay the underdog, and continue to smoke everyone with your nonvtec power.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i want v tec man
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by everlasting1832 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">which one eats more gas, or gets more mpg?</TD></TR></TABLE>\
both have same mpg just that gsr need higher octane so you pay more.
both have same mpg just that gsr need higher octane so you pay more.




