I ran across this article that said http://www.welovehondas.com/crx.htm the hf was a 1.3 I thought it was a 1.5 just with a special tranny..?

 

the ones in the article are first gen rex's and yes the hf was 1.3 until 88

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by d16vtecx &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the ones in the article are first gen rex's and yes the hf was 1.3 until 88</TD></TR></TABLE>

Not true. The HF had a 1.3 liter ONLY in 1984 and 1985. In 1986-1987, it had a 1.5.

 

"Able to hit 60 mph in less than 9 seconds, the Si also boasted handling enhancements, such as 14-inch alloy wheels with 185/60R14 high-performance tires."

Oh ****, that's quick.

 

i could only dream of a 0-60mph like that

 

67 mpg highway driving...FUKING RIDICULOUS!

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by pr3d &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">67 mpg highway driving...FUKING RIDICULOUS!</TD></TR></TABLE>

This was before the epa corrected their testing practices and reduced highway numbers by ~20%, 67 mpg is bullshit.

 

My moms old CRX HF got 50MPG on a 1990, she crashed it sadly around 95 I'm sure a 1.3 would have made better gas mileage

 

My crx dx with an hf tranny gets 50 in mixed driving, so it's not impossible.

Anyway, just because it's smaller doesn't mean it's better, it was also carb'd and prolly not built as efficiently as the new hf engines were.