rear wheel drive accords
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 2
From: Houston, TX
Re: rear wheel drive accords (Jmumblez2001)
1. The Accord is not a sports car.
2. The average driver does not need, want, or care about RWD.
3. FWD is more efficient. (Less drivetrain losses)
4. FWD is safer, in the sense that the car is easier to control during bad conditions. (Think: hydroplaning)
5. The Accord is not a sports car.
6. This thread doesn't belong in this forum. Try GDD next time.
2. The average driver does not need, want, or care about RWD.
3. FWD is more efficient. (Less drivetrain losses)
4. FWD is safer, in the sense that the car is easier to control during bad conditions. (Think: hydroplaning)
5. The Accord is not a sports car.
6. This thread doesn't belong in this forum. Try GDD next time.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 2
From: Houston, TX
Re: rear wheel drive accords (H22A 94Inspire)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by H22A 94Inspire »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">because they have absolutey no weight in the back and u would get no traction what so ever.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Once you add a rear diff, axles, supports for rear diff, etc., that would not really be an issue.
Once you add a rear diff, axles, supports for rear diff, etc., that would not really be an issue.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 0
From: In the air of the night, S. Fla.
Re: rear wheel drive accords (H22A 94Inspire)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by H22A 94Inspire »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">because they have absolutey no weight in the back and u would get no traction what so ever.</TD></TR></TABLE> lol... wtf..?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
91integraLSVTEC
Drag Racing
5
Feb 12, 2004 07:56 AM
turbo4racing
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
29
Jun 8, 2003 10:05 PM