Testin the EF/CRX game
Thread Starter
Help we my pennies
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,411
Likes: 0
From: 08854, NJ
Testin the EF/CRX game
I never really liked ef/crx just Bc eg.ek.dc are much easyer to work on! I have been tryin to get a EF hatch this summa as a beater and in the future turn it into a race car.. I know these Efs are pretty light, 2000-2200pds(gutted).. I was really thinking about dropping a stock D motor , with a mild turbo setup.. but i really dont know a thing aboout EF/turbo .. can someone shed some light on me? with a stock 96 EX motor fit with stock motors mounts etc..? i
Modified by BLUE EH3 at 3:28 AM 7/18/2006
Modified by BLUE EH3 at 3:30 AM 7/18/2006
Modified by BLUE EH3 at 3:28 AM 7/18/2006
Modified by BLUE EH3 at 3:30 AM 7/18/2006
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,804
Likes: 0
From: Malibu of the desert Hesperia, ca, USA
Re: Testin the EF/CRX game (BLUE EH3)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BLUE EH3 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I never really liked ef/crx just Bc eg.ek.dc are much easyer to work on! I have been tryin to get a EF hatch this summa as a beater and in the future turn it into a race car.. I know these Efs are pretty light, 2000-2200pds(gutted).. I was really thinking about dropping a stock D motor , with a mild turbo setup.. but i really dont know a thing aboout EF/turbo .. can someone shed some light on me? with a stock stock 96 EX motot fit with stock motors? i </TD></TR></TABLE>
huh??
huh??
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 0
From: ND
Re: (silentdork818)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by atomikpunx2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">stay with the cable ef tranny.
and the d16y8 will bolt in.</TD></TR></TABLE> what he said and get a si cable tranny.
and the d16y8 will bolt in.</TD></TR></TABLE> what he said and get a si cable tranny.
Junior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: HillBilly Town, Florida
Re: (d16efhatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by d16efhatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> what he said and get a si cable tranny.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Si tranny with the DX final drive for the best of both worlds.
Si tranny with the DX final drive for the best of both worlds.
Trending Topics
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
From: 818, CA, USA
Re: (Rex-Si)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rex-Si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Si tranny with the DX final drive for the best of both worlds.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thats just a DX tranny then..
Si tranny with the DX final drive for the best of both worlds.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thats just a DX tranny then..
Thread Starter
Help we my pennies
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,411
Likes: 0
From: 08854, NJ
Re: (silentdork818)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by silentdork818 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">EKs are easier to work on?? Youre crazy!! Those things are horrible..</TD></TR></TABLE>WTF
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,647
Likes: 29
From: colorado springs, co, usa
Re: (SIred91)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SIred91 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you will have to get the hydro to cable conversion kit.
hasport.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i don't think Hasport has one for D-series - only for B-series - D-series hydraulic clutch transmissions mounts are completely different from cable clutch transmissiona
hasport.
</TD></TR></TABLE>i don't think Hasport has one for D-series - only for B-series - D-series hydraulic clutch transmissions mounts are completely different from cable clutch transmissiona
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 2
From: long island, ny, usa
Re: (jlicrx)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jlicrx »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i don't think Hasport has one for D-series - only for B-series - D-series hydraulic clutch transmissions mounts are completely different from cable clutch transmissiona</TD></TR></TABLE>
this is correct. you must use cable with D.
this is correct. you must use cable with D.
B*a*n*n*e*d
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,291
Likes: 0
From: Hessian Aggression
Re: Testin the EF/CRX game (BLUE EH3)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BLUE EH3 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I never really liked ef/crx just Bc eg.ek.dc are much easyer to work on! I have been tryin to get a EF hatch this summa as a beater and in the future turn it into a race car.. I know these Efs are pretty light, 2000-2200pds(gutted).. I was really thinking about dropping a stock D motor , with a mild turbo setup.. but i really dont know a thing aboout EF/turbo .. can someone shed some light on me? with a stock stock 96 EX motot fit with stock motors? i </TD></TR></TABLE>
oh so youre gonna pull one d series out and put another d series in, add a turbo when you obviously dont know your *** from last thursday? video tape it please. a race car huh.......
oh so youre gonna pull one d series out and put another d series in, add a turbo when you obviously dont know your *** from last thursday? video tape it please. a race car huh.......
Rainman
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,979
Likes: 0
From: Kills, Utah
Re: (jlicrx)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jlicrx »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i don't think Hasport has one for D-series - only for B-series - D-series hydraulic clutch transmissions mounts are completely different from cable clutch transmissiona</TD></TR></TABLE>
yah your right, may bad.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vteckillenzc »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">IMO i perfer cable over hydro but thats just me.</TD></TR></TABLE>
me too.
i don't think Hasport has one for D-series - only for B-series - D-series hydraulic clutch transmissions mounts are completely different from cable clutch transmissiona</TD></TR></TABLE>
yah your right, may bad.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vteckillenzc »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">IMO i perfer cable over hydro but thats just me.</TD></TR></TABLE>
me too.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
From: 818, CA, USA
Re: (BLUE EH3)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BLUE EH3 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">WTF</TD></TR></TABLE>
Man they have what..like 5 mounts? What a hassle...
Man they have what..like 5 mounts? What a hassle...
Thread Starter
Help we my pennies
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,411
Likes: 0
From: 08854, NJ
Re: (silentdork818)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by silentdork818 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Man they have what..like 5 mounts? What a hassle...</TD></TR></TABLE> so what!!.. what do i need to put a D hydro tranny.. is there a good post on this stuff?
Man they have what..like 5 mounts? What a hassle...</TD></TR></TABLE> so what!!.. what do i need to put a D hydro tranny.. is there a good post on this stuff?
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Marysville, Ohio, USA
Re: (BLUE EH3)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BLUE EH3 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> so what!!.. what do i need to put a D hydro tranny.. is there -a good post on this stuff?</TD></TR></TABLE>
i think innovative mounts has a cable to hydro kit for the d series, either that or convert your car to hydro clutch setup using salvage yard parts. dont know exactly what would work but just of the top of my head probably parts off a 92-93 teg or 92-00~ civic
i think innovative mounts has a cable to hydro kit for the d series, either that or convert your car to hydro clutch setup using salvage yard parts. dont know exactly what would work but just of the top of my head probably parts off a 92-93 teg or 92-00~ civic
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,779
Likes: 2
From: Land of the free, whoever told you that is your enemy
Re: Testin the EF/CRX game (BLUE EH3)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BLUE EH3 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I never really liked ef/crx just Bc eg.ek.dc are much easyer to work on! </TD></TR></TABLE>
WTF? CRXes are super easy to work on. I freaking hate anything newer than 91. Not to mention they are all ugly, and **** from 92-up. You obviously have never worked on a CRX. I've worked on every FWD Honda chassis, and prefer the 88-91 over all others.
WTF? CRXes are super easy to work on. I freaking hate anything newer than 91. Not to mention they are all ugly, and **** from 92-up. You obviously have never worked on a CRX. I've worked on every FWD Honda chassis, and prefer the 88-91 over all others.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 3
From: Kitchener, On, Canada
Re: Testin the EF/CRX game (-=CRXBart=-)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by -=CRXBart=- »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
WTF? CRXes are super easy to work on. I freaking hate anything newer than 91. Not to mention they are all ugly, and **** from 92-up. You obviously have never worked on a CRX. I've worked on every FWD Honda chassis, and prefer the 88-91 over all others. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I hear ya man! I've work on some EG coupes, some EK hatchs, a 90 Accord, a 88 Accord, a 94 Accord, a 93 Prelude and a 02 Civic, and I'd rather work on my 90 Civic anyday. I didn't know the difference between 88-89 90-91 until I took mine I'd say....70% apart (empty engine bay, no interior) and rebuilt it. Holy **** did I ever realise that outside of not having enough engine room, our cars are the simplest hondas around. If you want complex, work on an Accord, just do a brake job and ask me if you like them!
WTF? CRXes are super easy to work on. I freaking hate anything newer than 91. Not to mention they are all ugly, and **** from 92-up. You obviously have never worked on a CRX. I've worked on every FWD Honda chassis, and prefer the 88-91 over all others. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I hear ya man! I've work on some EG coupes, some EK hatchs, a 90 Accord, a 88 Accord, a 94 Accord, a 93 Prelude and a 02 Civic, and I'd rather work on my 90 Civic anyday. I didn't know the difference between 88-89 90-91 until I took mine I'd say....70% apart (empty engine bay, no interior) and rebuilt it. Holy **** did I ever realise that outside of not having enough engine room, our cars are the simplest hondas around. If you want complex, work on an Accord, just do a brake job and ask me if you like them!