Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack Road Racing / AUTOX, HPDE, Time Attack

comptech sway-bar = stock class??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2002 | 07:12 PM
  #1  
ToneyTigre's Avatar
Thread Starter
New User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Cupertino, CA, US
Default comptech sway-bar = stock class??

did a search. couldn't find anyhting. im returning my car to stock and just having koni yellow shocks on the lowest perch settin with stock springs and comptech sway bar. Im trying to be in "E stock" class. will it pass?

The comptech website had something about the sway bar being "SCCA showroom stock C" requirement. http://solar.innercite.com/comptech/suspension3.html whats that all about? please. if you have any info. let me know. thanks.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2002 | 07:16 PM
  #2  
.RJ's Avatar
.RJ
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 30,826
Likes: 0
From: RIP Craig Jones
Default Re: comptech sway-bar = stock class?? (ToneyTigre)

In Stock class autoX, the spring perches must be at their stock setting (unless you have a car like a Miata R which had a lower than stock spring search from the factory) and the front sway bar may be modified, but not the rear.

Ryan
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2002 | 11:13 PM
  #3  
ToneyTigre's Avatar
Thread Starter
New User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Cupertino, CA, US
Default Re: comptech sway-bar = stock class?? (Type-RJ)

so what's comptech blabbering about it being stock class??
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2002 | 11:25 PM
  #4  
JMU R1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,360
Likes: 0
From: Arlington // Madison Motorsports, VA, USA
Default Re: comptech sway-bar = stock class?? (ToneyTigre)

Comptech is referring to Showroom Stock C which is a road racing class. A few years ago to equalize competition in Showroom Stock SCCA implemented "trunk kits" which were basically a specific set of modifications for each car in SSB or SSC in order to create better parity. This was a colossal failure as the Civic Si annihilated all comers with its Comptech swaybar and aftermarket shocks (Mugen IIRC). Now SCCA is eliminating trunk kits, mostly because manufacturers have not been giving SCCA the support they need to make fair trunk kits.

In autocrossing rear swaybar != stock class. Only front sway bars are allowed, which sucks for us campaigning front wheel drive...

If you want more info on the classing and rules for autocrossing check out http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/

-G
Edit: spelling


[Modified by JMU R1, 8:25 AM 4/18/2002]
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2002 | 05:56 AM
  #5  
.RJ's Avatar
.RJ
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 30,826
Likes: 0
From: RIP Craig Jones
Default Re: comptech sway-bar = stock class?? (JMU R1)

This rule was brought about many years ago, when most cars were RWD. The "stock" rules used to be quite liberal, and the "street prepared" rules list read more like a prepared/modified class. However, with the reshuffling and addition of new classes the front sway bar rule stuck. Some people have said that you should allow replacement of the sway bar opposite the drive wheels (rear sway for FWD, front sway for RWD) but, its not likely to change that way - more likely to be eliminated all together.

If you drive a nose heavy softly sprung underdamped understeering POS like a saturn, a big front sway bar can help keep the front end planted down and the inside wheel on the ground in a turn - otherwise my suspension would unload off the inside wheel and it would spin like a motherf@#%!

In autocrossing rear swaybar != stock class. Only front sway bars are allowed, which sucks for us campaigning front wheel drive...

-G
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2002 | 10:54 AM
  #6  
ToneyTigre's Avatar
Thread Starter
New User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Cupertino, CA, US
Default Re: comptech sway-bar = stock class?? (Type-RJ)

ahhh.. thanks for clearing that up for my. thats too bad FF cars can't change rear sway bars, we really need it. oh well, im keeping my sway bar. its too good to take off.

so should i be in the E prepared class or the STS class? what do you think?


[Modified by ToneyTigre, 11:55 AM 4/18/2002]
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2002 | 11:05 AM
  #7  
VTEConly's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: Rockland/Orange, NY, USA
Default Re: comptech sway-bar = stock class?? (ToneyTigre)

With the mods you have you should be more competitive in STS. '99-00 Civic Si's with springs/Konis & swaybar (and with I/H/E) do pretty well in STS.
I don't see how your car qualifies for EP. In order for your car to get kicked up to a Prepared class you must have true engine or head mods or lighten up the car. Do you have any engine mods, or taken out the seats, paneling, etc? If no, then your other choice besides STS is SP or Street Prepared (DSP or CSP - gotta look it up). SP is a much faster class than STS, because most have R tires, LSD, lighter flywheel, etc. on top of I/H/E & suspension mods. In STS you 're not allowed to add LSD, flywheel, etc. and everyone is on street tires.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2002 | 12:10 PM
  #8  
MaddMatt's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 2
From: Kings Mt., NC
Default Re: comptech sway-bar = stock class?? (VTEConly)

Showroom stock does not mean solo 2 stock. Two completely different things.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2002 | 12:28 PM
  #9  
Crack Monkey's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,200
Likes: 0
From: One by one, the penguins steal my sanity.
Default Re: comptech sway-bar = stock class?? (Type-RJ)

This rule was brought about many years ago, when most cars were RWD. The "stock" rules used to be quite liberal, and the "street prepared" rules list read more like a prepared/modified class. However, with the reshuffling and addition of new classes the front sway bar rule stuck.
Hmm, I heard a different story on the history of stock and SP...

Stock has always been about the same - allownces generally were based on wear items (shocks, plugs, wires, tires), not performance. And SP has become more lenient over time - hell look at the statement of purpose on the first page - it says something to the effect of "although called street prepared, cars are not actually streetable anymore". I was under the impression that the swaybar allownace in Stock was a safety item.

Anybody know the real history?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2002 | 05:42 PM
  #10  
ToneyTigre's Avatar
Thread Starter
New User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Cupertino, CA, US
Default Re: comptech sway-bar = stock class?? (Crack Monkey)

well, back to STS i go...
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2002 | 07:15 PM
  #11  
.RJ's Avatar
.RJ
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 30,826
Likes: 0
From: RIP Craig Jones
Default Re: comptech sway-bar = stock class?? (Crack Monkey)

Well, street prepared rules, as we know them now, were initially created to allow a streetable car with lots of performance upgrades...

Back in the day when people had MG's and other assorted british cars that were always broken and blowing up engines, when rebuilds and such had to come, the rules would allow them to do alot more than a .010" overbore and not balance it, since it was going to be expensive as fvck either way. At this time there was pretty much "stock" and "prepared" as i understand it. Street prepared was added to provide a happy medium and the stock rules were toned down a bit, and the front sway bar allowance carried over in stock.

This is the story as i understand it. I could be wrong. If i am, i'll buy ya a and you can tell me the straight poop

Hmm, I heard a different story on the history of stock and SP...

Stock has always been about the same - allownces generally were based on wear items (shocks, plugs, wires, tires), not performance. And SP has become more lenient over time - hell look at the statement of purpose on the first page - it says something to the effect of "although called street prepared, cars are not actually streetable anymore". I was under the impression that the swaybar allownace in Stock was a safety item.

Anybody know the real history?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dr0d23
Acura TSX
2
May 26, 2008 10:29 PM
Sailbum
Acura TSX
7
Dec 12, 2005 05:59 AM
nzrnk
Acura Integra
16
Feb 20, 2005 07:23 PM
MGF
Acura Integra
3
Oct 19, 2004 10:19 AM
montyww
Acura Integra
2
Sep 5, 2003 12:40 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:33 PM.