I finally got around to tuning my good freinds LS/VTEC turbo EG hatch. Some of you may have seen it in last months Honda Tuning Magazine(may 06). This was only a pump gas session. A race gas tune is right around the corner.

437whp @ 8700rpms
273 ft. lbs.
16.8 lbs of boost 92 octane
Tuned1 tuned w/ AEM EMS





This was on 15.4 lbs. of boost

This was on 16.8 lbs. of boost

There is no ft. lbs. on this graph due to a bad tach pick up for rpm's on this run.

 

good job man. setup?

 

The list is very long. To be short:

B18B LA sleeved 81mm block 9.2ish: compression
PURE Tuning worked B16 head
00 Integra type r cams
Fearra .5 valves
Crower valvetrain
Edlebrock intake manifold (port matched)
BBK 70mm throtle body
RPS T4 manifold DEI heat wrapped
.68 ar T4 turbo
Tial 44mm wastegate
Tial 50mm bov
3" downpipe
Kteller 3" exhaust
-8 and -10 fuel lines
Aeromotive pump/filter/regulators
Precision 1000cc injectors
AEM EMS/UEGO/3.5 bar

want to know anything else just ask

 

nice power.

what times do you think you can get at that power?

good luck

 

awsome manifold, how did you come up on that ?

 

Damn the Power just keeps climbing.

 

Nice #'s!!!

Can i see some interior pics??

 

All I have. All the interior has is a cage,seat,harness,fuel cell,TEIN EDFC and some gauges.

 

Probably mid 11's on slicks. He has 225 BF drag radials on the front. So as long as the car can hook on those it should be in the 11's and in the mid 120's for traps. We were going to the track tonight but its raining here in Cincinnati. Sucks maybe next weekend.

 

Bought it new about 2 years ago.

 

The car went 12.3 @ 120mph today on 14lbs. and street tires. Boost was down a lb or 2. The boost is controlled using a GM boost soleniod off of a Cyclone through the ems. My lap top was dead by the time we got to the track so we just ran it as it was. This was the first EVER track appearance for the car. It will only get better.

 

car looks good. when you gonna put in some
race gas and turn up the boost?

 

does that thing boost creep, or did you set it up to slowly increase boost?

 

for a better accurate reading. choose Smoothing: 0 or 1 for all graphs

2nd graph. choose RPM on the Y-axis rather than speed


looks good

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AMS MIKE &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">for a better accurate reading. choose Smoothing: 0 or 1 for all graphs

2nd graph. choose RPM on the Y-axis rather than speed


looks good </TD></TR></TABLE>

Smoothing takes down any huge bumps that give you artificially high numbers, and he already said he had RPM pickup issues on the second pull.........

 

At peak torque the boost was about 14. It creaps up about a 1 1/2 pounds from 6800 to 8700.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AMS MIKE &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


looks good </TD></TR></TABLE>

Thanks!

 

Very nice car looks clean.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chip &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
he already said he had RPM pickup issues on the second pull.........</TD></TR></TABLE>

How can you get a horsepower number without rpm?
rpm x torque / 5252 = Hp right?

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tuned1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">At peak torque the boost was about 14. It creaps up about a 1 1/2 pounds from 6800 to 8700.</TD></TR></TABLE>

traction control

 

hmm not bad

 

Why sleeve the block to a stock bore size?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bailhatch &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">How can you get a horsepower number without rpm?
rpm x torque / 5252 = Hp right?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yep, but Dynojets actually measure horsepower, and calculate torque based on RPM's and horsepower. Mustang dynos, Dynapacks, etc, measure torque and calculate horsepower, which is why you can skew off your power readings by messing with the gear ratios in the dyno software

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Combustion Contraption &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why sleeve the block to a stock bore size?</TD></TR></TABLE>

To have a completely bulletproof motor?

 

ah, i see. never used a dynojet myself.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chip &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Yep, but Dynojets actually measure horsepower, and calculate torque based on RPM's and horsepower. Mustang dynos, Dynapacks, etc, measure torque and calculate horsepower, which is why you can skew off your power readings by messing with the gear ratios in the dyno software </TD></TR></TABLE>

Completely wrong. You cant measure horsepower because its just a calculation. A dynapack, and every other type of dyno on this earth measures TORQUE and calculates from there. Have you ever seen a horsepower wrench? This may help you understand.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/horsepower2.htm
Read the last paragraph.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chip &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

To have a completely bulletproof motor?</TD></TR></TABLE>

What about this magical 81mm bore size is so bulletproof? I think theres alot more to sleeving a block to be "bulletproof" than a magic 3.12" of missing material.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Combustion Contraption &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why sleeve the block to a stock bore size?</TD></TR></TABLE>

The block has been sleeved for about 3 years now. before 83,84mm where the coolest thing ever to do. You can make plenty of power on a 81mm block. Blahblah