I want to know what everyone runs and what you had and what you did to run it.

I Ran my car at the track for the first time last friday at VIRGINIA MOTORSPORTS PARK. all i had was an AEM cold air intake and a JDM 4-1 header..i went header out and took out my interior...my very first run was a 14.3......i bogged at the launch...as i said before it was my first time and i couldnt get my launch as good as i do on the streets..i ran constant low 14's still trying to get my launch right....then my very last run i hit a 13.9 with a 2.4 60ft......i hit a 2.2 60ft on a earlier run but i tacked out a little bit in first gear and i hit a 14.3 again...
I think i can get it lower with the same mods....hoping 13.7 same mods street tires...



[Modified by JDMan, 12:47 AM 4/11/2002]

 

13.9 w/ intake and header?

someone post up the bs flag

 

or hes just one hell of a driver....... with some real tight tires !!!

 

ive seen 14.5 w/ a intake and clutch with good driver and good tires.... no way in hell any driving skills + jdm header is gonna bring that down .6 seconds

 

read the sig. and that is on kumho 712's...just exhaust and spoon filter.

 

Even I have a hard time believing that. Especially with a 2.4 60' it just ain't happening. You must be leaving something out such as "oh I frogot to tell you guys my car only weighs 2,300lbs".

 

i believe him.

 

do you also believe in santa claus?

 

hahaha

remember though...no interior and rota slipstreams
possible but not probable

 

how do you do that with a 2.4 60 ft. do you have a time slip? i hit a 2.1 60 and only ran a 14.1.

 

My best is in my sig.....AEM CAI only, all seats in the car...crap 2.334 60' too.

 

I dont see what's so hard to believe about it. I mean they run a mid 14 stock, and with intake and open headers(I think he was trying to say that) high high high 13 wouldn't be so hard. And isn't 100lbs supposed to take off .1 off your e.t. or is that just a bs theory.

 

i am just confused about his 60ft. time. i wish I could make that much time up after sucking on my 60..

 

Ok after reading it a few times I got that he must have been running open header. Well I got darn close to that with the same basic mods so if he stripped everthing out I guess it might be possible. 102mph trap speed is pretty freaking fast and a 2.4 shows that there is still improvement to be made. My best run wasn't on one of my best 60's either, but some proof would be nice.

 

Not on a 2.4 60 ft.

 

its possible. If he tried to duplicate the same time it would probably be hard. Everyone has their good runs. My buddy in a stock CRX would always pull 16's but on one lucky run he got a 15.3 . go figure. Its certainly not out of reach, just uncommon among the average.

and no i dont belive in santa fusionR.

tj

 

I have apexi n1, jdm 4-1, and aem cai....and with a 2.2 60' I ran a 14.41

 

Hye JDMan, I'm in the Richmond area and have a 98 Type R and have been meaning to get out to the strip sometime. Let me know the next time you get out there. Later, Ryan

 

To settle the dispute why doesn't JDMan just post up his timeslip?

 

Sorry to say this, but I will call BS before I see the time slip.
Even with the time slip, I still doubt are the AEM CAI and JDM 4-1 the only mod.

 

i do know someone that ran a 14.38 with an AEM cai and street tires...thats it and he ran a 14.38...so it may be possible with a great launch and 60' times and a gutted interior....but it would have to be one hell of a driver.....i wish i could drive that well

 

here is my time slip.. no bullshit for real. If you want to come see me run again, be at VMP at 5:00 this friday for import rave.

http://www.imagestation.com/mypictures/inbox/


[Modified by JDMan, 3:52 AM 4/11/2002]

 

i believe him..... all i have on my gsr is intake, itr suspension, itr exhaust. on kuhmo's i ran 14.81@98 mph

 

nevermind, great time!!



[Modified by disordeR, 7:50 PM 4/10/2002]

 

14.38 and 13.9 has a BIG difference.

Can someone post the slip? I am too lazy to register.


[Modified by Ideal R, 10:57 PM 4/10/2002]


[Modified by Ideal R, 10:59 PM 4/10/2002]


[Modified by Ideal R, 10:59 PM 4/10/2002]