I know it's not Hype R material, but most on here like good, factual data.

Stock Hype R puts down 145ish on my rollers. FYI



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2006 SI
2003 miles

Car was 100% stock for the baseline, then we added:

AEM CAI
DC Sports Race Header
DC Sports Cat-back
Tein S-Tech springs

Note:
NOT Dyno Jet numbers!!
All work was done on the same day.

Enjoy

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Before versus After


Same data from above, but in "Deltas" format


Air fuel data Before


Air fuel data After

 

not too shabby!

damn that thing is RICH from the factory!

how much does that pig weight?

 

Stock R's put down 145 to the wheels according to your dyno?

Wow. Thats 35% drivetrain loss

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dc2r01 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Stock R's put down 145 to the wheels according to your dyno?

Wow. Thats 35% drivetrain loss..:\</TD></TR></TABLE>

Its a mustang dyno

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RTW DC2R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">how much does that pig weight?</TD></TR></TABLE>

2877lbs

 

umm i'm not really enjoying it

K&gt;B

civic's catching up to itr's now.

omg omg omg


Modified by itr1244 at 2:04 AM 4/15/2006

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by itr1244 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">civic's catching up to itr's now.</TD></TR></TABLE>

The ITR is technology from 1996, what'd you expect?

 

Good gains

&lt; Still hasn't seen a new Si in person

 

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chris93Si &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
&lt; Still hasn't seen a new Si in person </TD></TR></TABLE>

You'll be able to get used to everything except that steering wheel that looks like it came out of a 1965 Ford Galaxy.

It's a nice little car. If you drive one, you'll like it a lot.

People bitch about the price a little, but remember that the ITR back then cost five or six grand more than the new Si is costing.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chris93Si &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Good gains

&lt; Still hasn't seen a new Si in person </TD></TR></TABLE>

they are all over the place here just like EVOs and STIs. I havent had a chance to put one in its place though with my ITR

&lt;&lt;&lt;may go test drive one today

 

I've seen a few.. Ok looking, but sure like the motor and tranny...

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by skunkintegra &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">2877lbs </TD></TR></TABLE>

That's precisely why it needs to make more power than the undefeatable TYTE-R.....

Thanks P1 for sharing the info

 

yeah they also sound great when they hit TEC

 

Thanks for the info
2006 Civic SI is a nice little car.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Team Teal &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah they also sound great when they hit VTEC</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yes, very true. Honda routed the intake right by the driver, so it really howls when you get on it.

I drove one, wasn't for me. Oh well.

 

would be a nice daily driver... to sloshy and pig feeling for me

 

i wonder how much weight you could strip off the new SI without going nuts

 

Thanks Jack - we're going to dyno Civic_Sista's FG on the Dynojet. I will post that with a comparo against the stock Type R.

2 things to note:
1)Rich
2)The marketing guys at Honda got to pick the vtec engagement point again
3)Needs more cam advance in the mid range

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ausmith &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
2 things to note:
1)Rich
2)The marketing guys at Honda got to pick the vtec engagement point again
3)Needs more cam advance in the mid range</TD></TR></TABLE>

That's three things.

Is VTEC too low or too high?

 

Damn I need a K series. Hey Jack can you quote me a price on a K swap.... Hmmm am I J/K hmmmm don't know. hahaha


Modified by Type-R Yo! at 10:03 AM 4/17/2006

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ausmith &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Thanks Jack - we're going to dyno Civic_Sista's FG on the Dynojet. I will post that with a comparo against the stock Type R.

2 things to note:
1)Rich
2)The marketing guys at Honda got to pick the vtec engagement point again
3)Needs more cam advance in the mid range</TD></TR></TABLE>

what's this noted about? ITR or that FG??

and i'm pretty sure #2 is not true

 

Is VTEC too low or too high?

At the stock cam angle, too low.

------------------------------------------------------------

Stock B18C5 (2000) plot below FYI.

 

nice gains

 

numbers look ok but trust me itr fans, these things are dogs. I work at the dealership driving them at least a couple times a week and I don't find it to be very impressive. It's a decent car for the price but definitely not for someone who wants a fast car, and the drive by wire is terrible, no throttle response when you want it most