All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 09:09 PM
  #1  
saver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: haha, California, USA
Default 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone.

i know i know. " who cares wat ppl say its your choice" well i just want to hear it from ppl who know more knowdlege and experiance. remember for DD and some AUTOX. and both street built.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 09:13 PM
  #2  
GOLDBERG's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: phoenix, hawaii
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (saver)

ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmm ..


so a stock sleeved b20 block @84mm, vs a ls sleeved block at 84mm... both with the same internals? is that what your asking?or both sleeved @84mm with same parts?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 09:23 PM
  #3  
saver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: haha, California, USA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (GOLDBERG)

wow thats umm a long (mmmmmmmmmmm) haha.
to answer your question they are sleeved to 2.0 with probaly aftermarket internals/valvetrain, being the same parts. i also want to know whitch block is worth to sleeve to. with the b20 im going to sleeve it cause of the so called sleeves.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 01:52 AM
  #4  
DanishR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
From: Lyngby/Denmark, Denmark
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (saver)

If both are resleeved they would be pretty much the same.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 04:59 AM
  #5  
StorminMatt's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,303
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA, USA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (DanishR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DanishR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If both are resleeved they would be pretty much the same.</TD></TR></TABLE>

And if both are going to be resleeved and the end result is the same, why not start with the cheaper B18A/B block?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 05:05 AM
  #6  
JDM SLEEP3R's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Mises.org
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (StorminMatt)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by StorminMatt &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

And if both are going to be resleeved and the end result is the same, why not start with the cheaper B18A/B block?</TD></TR></TABLE>
i thought a b20 was cheaper?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 05:22 AM
  #7  
d16dcoe45's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 0
From: Armonk, NY, USA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (JDM SLEEP3R)

If they are both going to be sleeved, some of the sleeving companies don't like to sleeve b20s because of the one piece sleeves, it leaves less block material after the sleeving operation. I would do the LS.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 05:37 AM
  #8  
Used2beAb16's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: western, PA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (d16dcoe45)

LS for no other reason than you can get a block for 75 bucks.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 05:47 AM
  #9  
fmrprojects's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, CA, US
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (Used2beAb16)

i believe he said sleeved LS or stock b20 sleeve. id go with the sleeved LS
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 07:10 AM
  #10  
D-Rob's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,680
Likes: 2
From: Carlisle, PA, USA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (fmrprojects)

Nothing like a 2.0 liter engine stamped as a 1.8 liter.

Sleeved 2.0 LSVTEC.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 07:13 AM
  #11  
7mile's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
From: BackYard Mechanic, usa
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (D-Rob)

.... i like the b20... i like the b20.....
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 09:00 AM
  #12  
UNKNOWN_MEMBER's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,337
Likes: 1
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (D-Rob)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by D-Rob &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Nothing like a 2.0 liter engine stamped as a 1.8 liter.

Sleeved 2.0 LSVTEC. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 07:20 PM
  #13  
Used2beAb16's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: western, PA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (UNKNOWN_MEMBER)

In all reality though there after your talking about sleeving both motors to the same bore the ls is definately the best choice for more than one reason and they are covered in this thread by several members.

The b20 is not the best choice.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 07:37 PM
  #14  
chad's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,232
Likes: 5
From: Browns Summit, NC, USA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (DanishR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DanishR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If both are resleeved they would be pretty much the same.</TD></TR></TABLE>

no .... if they are both sleeved they are the same thing cept for the b20X or b18X on the block code!!!
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 09:20 PM
  #15  
saver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: haha, California, USA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (chad)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Used2beAb16 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">LS for no other reason than you can get a block for 75 bucks. </TD></TR></TABLE>

i dont think ive ever seen a LS block for $75. if so thats sick.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fmrprojects &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i believe he said sleeved LS or stock b20 sleeve. id go with the sleeved LS</TD></TR></TABLE>

acually i said both are not stock. both being aftermarket. sleeved and parts.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2006 | 09:21 PM
  #16  
saver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: haha, California, USA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (saver)

all these reasons are really great about the B18b being the best choice. so wats up with this now that i hear you could put a type R oil griddle on the B18b blocks.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 02:42 AM
  #17  
D-Rob's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,680
Likes: 2
From: Carlisle, PA, USA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (saver)

Yes, I did such a thing, just on a B18A block.

If you decide to do that, have the machine shop check if the mains are still in round with the new ones, and if not, align hone.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 04:29 AM
  #18  
StorminMatt's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,303
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA, USA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (JDM SLEEP3R)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDM SLEEP3R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i thought a b20 was cheaper?</TD></TR></TABLE>

A stock B20 is cheaper than a resleeved LS. But a stock LS is cheaper than a stock B20. So if both are to be resleeved, the resleeved LS is FAR cheaper. The bottom line: a B20 is a better deal if you plan to run a mild, daily driven, non-VTEC setup. But if you plan to resleeve, an LS is by far the better deal.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 06:28 AM
  #19  
DC2 Mang's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 0
From: Commufornia
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (StorminMatt)

stock b20 sleeves are weak and it is not reccomended to rev it past 8500 rpms

plus seeing a b18 stamp on a block is more sleeper than seening a b20 stamp
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #20  
saver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: haha, California, USA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (JDMdc2lsVtec)

how does a ITR oil girddle fit on a B18b block.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 06:33 AM
  #21  
D-Rob's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,680
Likes: 2
From: Carlisle, PA, USA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (saver)

There has been many, many threads covering such a thing, but basically...

You Need:

- ITR/GSR girdle
- ITR/GSR main caps 2,3,4
- ITR/GSR windage tray and oil pickup
- ITR/GSR oil pan
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 06:43 AM
  #22  
existanzcivicb20's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
From: Mid West
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (D-Rob)

b20 all the way my b20/vtec set up is a daily driver reved up yo 7,500 all most every day still runs strong I have not had a problem with it so b20 b20 b20 b20 so what im trying to say is b20
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 11:45 AM
  #23  
rodimus's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,593
Likes: 0
From: So Cal, CA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (young O)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by young O &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">b20 all the way my b20/vtec set up is a daily driver reved up yo 7,500 all most every day still runs strong I have not had a problem with it so b20 b20 b20 b20 so what im trying to say is b20 </TD></TR></TABLE>
and a well built 2.0 LS/VTEC resleeved and built to the bone would eat you up, unless you resleeved, which the LS block is still the better choice.

egh..i don't like this thread.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 09:52 PM
  #24  
saver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: haha, California, USA
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (EVOL)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by D-Rob &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">There has been many, many threads covering such a thing, but basically...

You Need:

- ITR/GSR girdle
- ITR/GSR main caps 2,3,4
- ITR/GSR windage tray and oil pickup
- ITR/GSR oil pan</TD></TR></TABLE>

so can you tell me about this. would it help the oil pick up since its coming from a Vtec motor. so you cant just mechine a LS crank into a B18c block.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 10:09 PM
  #25  
Anthony's Avatar
Mr. Fuch-yu
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
From: Johnson City, TN
Default Re: 2.0 LS/vtec or B20/vtec: both built to the bone. (saver)

LS block Darton M.I.D sleeves and overbore FTW

-Anthony
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:06 PM.