I thought it would be funny to see whose bikes make more horsepower than their car like mine does.

Here's what I got:

2006 Kawasaki Z1000 - 125bhp

2000 Honda Civic EX - 127hp (which we all know is not 127 more like 105)

 

why is that funny?

 

03 RC51 = 128
96 Tacoma = Damn slow, that's why I call it the Slowcoma (4 cyl extra cab )

 

I don't currently have a bike. *chukle/chortle*

 

Its funny because you would expect a car to have more horsepower. Sorry if its not hardy har har funny. I mean wierd funny

 

Your also comparing a gas efficient commuter car (which is not supposed to be a high HP vehicle) to a liter bike.

It's all about power to weight ratio.

 

bikes might have high horsepower compared to cars but they have very little torque in comparison.

 

1992 Civic DX: 102HP
2003 CBR 600RR: 109HP

 

2006 zx10r 166whp!!!!!

 

2002 S2000

will be getting a 2005 600RR or R6

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MadnessRacing &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">2006 zx10r 166whp!!!!! </TD></TR></TABLE>
What about your EG? Nice avatar

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rednas &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">bikes might have high horsepower compared to cars but they have very little torque in comparison.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Twins

And that's because cars don't often rev past 10k. And when they do, they're not the type of car that very many people have the oppurtunity to drive.

1.8t MKIV Jetta 195ish whp / 245ish ft'lbs tq
05 rc51 127ish whp / 80ish ft'lbs tq

 

2000 Integra k20 swap (220ish-240ish whp)
2006 GSXR 600 (100ish)

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by backlash &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
What about your EG? Nice avatar </TD></TR></TABLE>

240 whp..

 

I'll play along.

vehicle - hp/torque

Superhawk - 105/73
Odyssey - 200/215
Civic - 127/0

 

lol no torque for the Honda eh?

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by marmaladeboy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'll play along.

vehicle - hp/torque

Superhawk - 105/73
Odyssey - 200/215
Civic - 127/0</TD></TR></TABLE>

 

You know it.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jim Anchower &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">lol no torque for the Honda eh?</TD></TR></TABLE>
They are all Honda's LOL

 

Stock Civic. rated at 107 hp

Stock F4. Rated around low 90 or so.

 

Dakota v8 230hp
turbo busa 350hp

 

superhawk: ~105whp/73wtq
civic: ~90whp/80wtq

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by backlash &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
What about your EG? Nice avatar </TD></TR></TABLE>

the girl in the talon?

removed,sorry - Luke

 

Whoa. Talk about zoom.

And that is NOT the correct way to wear seatbelts. Her hands aren't even at 10 and 2.

 

Stock - 1991 CRX HF 62hp
Stock - 1993 Suzuki GSX-R600W 106hp

 

Cadillac DeVille- 275 Hp
Turbo Busa 300+ Rwhp