2004 S2000 AEM CAI install (plots, before/after)
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,790
Likes: 1
From: NC, USA
2004 S2000 AEM CAI install (plots, before/after)
2004
8,550 miles
100% stock, only change was AEM CAI V2 and VAFC II
note:
NOT DYNOJET numbers, test was done on a Mustang MD-500
Baseline:
After:
Only change was the installation of a AEM CAI V2 and VAFC II (only the x-over point was changed NO fuel corrections were made)
Versus:
8,550 miles
100% stock, only change was AEM CAI V2 and VAFC II
note:
NOT DYNOJET numbers, test was done on a Mustang MD-500
Baseline:
After:
Only change was the installation of a AEM CAI V2 and VAFC II (only the x-over point was changed NO fuel corrections were made)
Versus:
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Northen Cali, CA
Re: 2004 S2000 AEM CAI install (SnoFlake)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SnoFlake »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">interesting!!!.... 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Really, but nice!
</TD></TR></TABLE>Really, but nice!
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 14,529
Likes: 1
From: Lost Somewhere
Re: 2004 S2000 AEM CAI install (Francesco)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Francesco »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thats about a normal gain...p1auto is good i hear </TD></TR></TABLE>
jack
</TD></TR></TABLE>jack
Trending Topics
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,310
Likes: 5
From: ILM, NC
Re: 2004 S2000 AEM CAI install (B18CXr)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18CXr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">After:
Only change was the installation of a AEM CAI V2 and VAFC II (only the x-over point was changed NO fuel corrections were made)</TD></TR></TABLE>
so, let us see what it did after your tuning wizardry......
Only change was the installation of a AEM CAI V2 and VAFC II (only the x-over point was changed NO fuel corrections were made)</TD></TR></TABLE>
so, let us see what it did after your tuning wizardry......
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 14,529
Likes: 1
From: Lost Somewhere
Re: 2004 S2000 AEM CAI install (Asahi)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Asahi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Are we going to get to see the tuned Fuel plots? I'd love to see the Air Fuel Stock vs Tuned.</TD></TR></TABLE>
on the S, tuning the AFR will net some midrange and also some top end...midrange is 5-8whp and top end is 2-3whp. this is what i have seen from vafc tuning
jeff evans tuned a stock S with aem ems and pulled 15whp out of it. I am not sure if it was really lean or a safe tune.
on the S, tuning the AFR will net some midrange and also some top end...midrange is 5-8whp and top end is 2-3whp. this is what i have seen from vafc tuning
jeff evans tuned a stock S with aem ems and pulled 15whp out of it. I am not sure if it was really lean or a safe tune.
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
From: Wrightsville or Carolina Beach, NC
Re: 2004 S2000 AEM CAI install (Nishant)
Pretty good increse . Are the stock numbers about right? My 2000 made 183 hp and 121 tq. on a mustang dyno all stock. I see that this one is an ap2, I would have thought the 2.2 would make more than 4 lbs of torque over the 2.0.
. Are the stock numbers about right? My 2000 made 183 hp and 121 tq. on a mustang dyno all stock. I see that this one is an ap2, I would have thought the 2.2 would make more than 4 lbs of torque over the 2.0.
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: North America
Re: 2004 S2000 AEM CAI install (Asahi)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Asahi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Are we going to get to see the tuned Fuel plots? I'd love to see the Air Fuel Stock vs Tuned.</TD></TR></TABLE>
+1
+1
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
