136hp@6657rpm 128.4lbft@4365

Just saw this while i was browsing around. Don't know if anybody else posted it up. Pretty good numbers I think. Sorry for the small size, don't really know how to resize. Here is the link to the page where you can see it better:

http://www.vtec.net/articles/v...15957



Modified by KENetics1 at 8:09 PM 2/20/2006

 

pretty n00bish question but what are the hp and tq numbers? I dont know which are which.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by eL &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">pretty n00bish question but what are the hp and tq numbers? I dont know which are which.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i posted that up now. On the link it will tell you too.

 

Those are stock numbers? The tq is exactly as rated on honda's site, isn't it supposed to be lower? Also the HP is only 4 less than rated by honda, were they under rated or is this because of the new hp measurments?

I just bought one, it's nice to know they have a bit more power than I was first told

 

I think it might be because it's on a dynopak and I think they tend to give out higher numbers. Not sure though. I don't know if he just slapped the car on and dynoed it or if he tried tuning, with what i have no idea. It is also shawn church and he is a pretty good tuner but i don't know what he could have used to tune it. I'm thinking about getting one too but probably a dx since it's the same engine.

 

its cool probably has like 120hp to the wheels

 

Someone on 8thgencivic.com has dynoed his stock ex manual.
120 whp.

The tov dyno is pointless.

 

shouldnt it be higher than 120? Seeing how the hp ratings changed a bit?

 

Doesnt matter if it should be more than 120.

Thats just what we are stuck with.

Ive got an 06 Sedan with exhaust and removed resonator from intake.

It feels a hell of a lot more than 120 whp for being such a heavy car.

But I have been wrong before.

 

that would be mine

 

Yes it would be.

Im 1493cc from 8thgen..