Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 09:19 PM
  #1  
GranadaTeg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: Eastcoast
Default Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold

Well, i been in the Integra game for a short time and all i been hearing is how bad the Stock GSR intake manifold is. People saying that its poorly designed and that theres no way to activate the 2nd manifold flap.

Thats why i been looking into getting the Skunk2 one...not the Pro-series.

Ok. so my question is, for people that has them....

What were the improvements you made?
What were the powers you gained/Lost? Low-end & Hi-end...
How did the car feel over all after you put in the Mani?


All comments welcomed...
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 09:28 PM
  #2  
GSRVTEC1's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: so cal 760, 858, 619, ca, usa
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (Slo Cord)

its all about your set up. if your just going to have I,H,E and not upgrading anything else, stick with the dual stage mani. if your going to throw in sum bigger cams then use the sk2 mani. i use to have a skun2 manifold in my gsr with just bolt ons and it ran like ****. lost alot of low end and also bogs at 4500rpm when vtec hits (ull also need VAFC or anything that has higher vtec Xover) i actually went back to stock manifold and gain alot more power
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 10:08 PM
  #3  
jizzer671's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: area 360, wa, usa
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (Slo Cord)

i hear its just as good as a type r mani. if not even better,just my.02
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 10:17 PM
  #4  
bigwhitebucket's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (valve timer)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by valve timer &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i hear its just as good as a type r mani. if not even better,just my.02</TD></TR></TABLE>
It may be but Honda designed that mani for that engine. Unless your planning on running more than bolt-ons, leave it.

Here's some pros and cons to stay on topic

Pro- Looks better
Con- I still have cuts all over my hands and arm from helping a friend install a S2 mani. That thing is retarded tight. Felt like I was workin on a VW
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 10:17 PM
  #5  
turbosnatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: central, fl, USA
Default

i think it is a must have mod for a gsr, lost a lil bottom but felt improvements at 4800+ and it might be just me but vtec sounded a lil louder, i did notice more improvements when i raised vtec to 5600

edit** yes u must have your basic bolt ons to get improvements *
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 10:19 PM
  #6  
Dartanian's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (Slo Cord)

I put my Skunk2 manifold on my boosted setup with CTR cams and it made a good amount of difference. Not only did it eliminate the extra variable of tuning the IABs, it also flows a lot better in the high end.

All this is really useless to a bolt-on setup, though, since I was actually bottlenecking at the manifold. The dual stage manifold isn't a bad design and unless you know you are bottlenecking, there should be no reason to change it.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 06:04 AM
  #7  
GranadaTeg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
From: Eastcoast
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (1:23)

I guess imma stay away from this.

I got NO bolt-ons....

Pure stock
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 07:46 AM
  #8  
1337whp's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: orange county, ca
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (Slo Cord)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Slo Cord &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I guess imma stay away from this.

I got NO bolt-ons....

Pure stock </TD></TR></TABLE>
well then your looking into the upgrade @ the wrong time.

the gsr IM is designed to give good low,mid range, and high power.
as far asi know, if you have just bolt-ons(i/h/e) it will not do much. but if you put in some cams,gear, etc. with the skunk2 im. then you will notice considerable gains (and if you have vtak youll notice more so than without). also id guess if you were going to run a turbo setup itd be a good choice. gl
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 07:51 AM
  #9  
TehMan's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,742
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC, U S and A
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (1337whp)

my skunk2 itm works great on my car. but it has more then just simple bolt ons.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 09:14 AM
  #10  
petergriffen's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: Charlottesville, va, U.S.A
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (AllMotorB18B)

i got skunk2 intake manifold for a ls and crower 403's for sale if any one wants them cheap too
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 11:09 PM
  #11  
aznwash3wboi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: san diego, CA
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (petergriffen)

i say get it.. i love mine... vtec pulls alot louder.. car sounds meaner too... but u need to change ur vtec engagement point or else u will loose power... i have a 2001 GSR which is OBD2 and not chipable... so i got a 2000 type-r ecu and works great... just have to take to acura so they can program ur Key to the ecu if ur running an OBD2B comp like i am... but if its OBD1 then just chip it
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2006 | 05:36 AM
  #12  
GSRVTEC1's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: so cal 760, 858, 619, ca, usa
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (aznwash3wboi)

inestead of chipping it, how bout a VAFC to raise it? in the longrun u cna *** wid it to best fit ur specs
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2006 | 04:40 PM
  #13  
aznwash3wboi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: san diego, CA
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (GSRVTEC1)

yea u could do that too.. im running the P73 cuz my friend had it laying around...
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 04:11 PM
  #14  
pennies_hatchie's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,117
Likes: 0
From: Jordan Michael, Minnesotian
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (GSRVTEC1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GSRVTEC1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">its all about your set up. if your just going to have I,H,E and not upgrading anything else, stick with the dual stage mani. if your going to throw in sum bigger cams then use the sk2 mani. i use to have a skun2 manifold in my gsr with just bolt ons and it ran like ****. lost alot of low end and also bogs at 4500rpm when vtec hits (ull also need VAFC or anything that has higher vtec Xover) i actually went back to stock manifold and gain alot more power</TD></TR></TABLE>

i agree 100% on this. stay away if you have bolt on's only
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #15  
00IntegraLSO-town's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida, USA
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (petergriffen)

think you could a price range for those 403's?
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2006 | 11:38 AM
  #16  
petergriffen's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: Charlottesville, va, U.S.A
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (00IntegraLSO-town)

320- 330 for cams 250 for intake manifold
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2006 | 02:40 PM
  #17  
Pnoyej6's Avatar
* B A N N E D *
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,087
Likes: 0
From: bay area, ca
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (petergriffen)

i have skunk 2 intake mani on my boosted gsr and vtec sounds meaner and pulls harder
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2006 | 03:23 PM
  #18  
strongarm1731's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Oregon, US
Default Re: Pro's and Con's on Skunk2 Intake Manifold (pnoytegn707)

look at the mods in my sig... I did the bigger TB and sk2 IM at the same time and there was a noticeable difference! Obviously once you do cams OR intake mani, GET TUNED! or atleast some sort of base map... Otherwise your car really will run like crap
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dc2_4life
Acura Integra
9
Jun 11, 2007 10:00 PM
sqad_7
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
58
Aug 25, 2005 09:29 PM
danteisme
Acura Integra
4
Feb 26, 2004 04:28 PM
LshatchTurbo
Tech / Misc
12
Apr 17, 2002 03:53 PM
Hispeed
Forced Induction
3
Sep 17, 2001 10:50 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:03 AM.