today I got my car tuned local and I dyno at, I think there good numbers here is what I have done, 70mm throttlebody and ported intake manifold,port and polish head with spring and retainers with type s cams and adj cam gears, fgk jdm header, 2.5 catback system tuned with hondata s200..so what do you think?

hp:216
tq: 147

 

Torque looks a little low ,other wise pretty good.

 

hp is nice....i would have expected more out of the torque tho. What kind of dyno? SAE?


graph?

 

it was on a mustang dyno but I will post the sheet later.

 

your sheet is gonna be the most helpful......

 

thats pretty low on tq....cant wait to see the curves though...the hp is pretty good for type s cams....

 

Nice #'s although the tq should be higher. Doesn't the Mustang Dyno read the lowest?

 

here a link to the dyno sheet

http://www.superhonda.com/phot...2.jpg

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hu &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Doesn't the Mustang Dyno read the lowest?</TD></TR></TABLE>

yeah i think youre right

 

its weird i dont understand how is hp curve is nice but its like his torque flat lined....i dunno maybe it is cause of the dyno. with the mods i dont see why is torque stayed so low.

 

how can I get more Torque out of it? and what do you guy think I should do to get more power? like new cams stuff like that..

 

your tq shoula be at around 180 with those mods, that number is really low

 

You show me a h22 all motor with 180 ft lbs and I'll kiss your ***!

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by raysjdmh22a &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">how can I get more Torque out of it? and what do you guy think I should do to get more power? like new cams stuff like that..</TD></TR></TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ludedimage &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">your tq shoula be at around 180 with those mods, that number is really low</TD></TR></TABLE>

Oh you're so helpful. After a million people telling him his torque is low - you go ahead and say it again. No **** dumbass - we all know his torque is low.

Isn't that a cheap header? I coulda sworn i saw that thing for like $200 bucks. If it is in fact a cheap header, an RMF header will work you wonders.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by raysjdmh22a &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">how can I get more Torque out of it? and what do you guy think I should do to get more power? like new cams stuff like that..</TD></TR></TABLE>

with your mods, higher compression would do you really really well. maybe 11.0 w/ some type s pistons if you want to keep it simple, some mahle gold's @ 11.5 or more if you want to get more involved.

also do you have a 7400 redline? or are you legging it out a little more?

 

well my red line got move up to 8500, and my peck power where I have to shift is 8100 to hold at 216, I was think about the type s piston but the tuner said it really wont make a big differents maybe 7hp, but I was really thinking about getting the RMF allmotor drag header, do you guy think I will make more P and TQ with this header more then 216? and also do you guys think I sould get a better intake manifold, cause the one I have is a stock ported one with the iab removed, and I also was think about getting the skunk2 pro series IM they said the made it better for the h22a, is that true?

 

OT:
LDL is a great shop and has a TON of experience with Hondas....

 

i've heard alot of good things about type-s pistons, im personally doin my setup with them...they are a factory made piston with a compression of 11:1 sounds good to me. and definetly go with that RMF header its sick and there are plenty of threads backing up its qaulity and numbers it throws down, and from what i here its 50/50 about the skunk2 IM some like it some dont i dunno. out of curiosity has anyone used the kteller rage header??

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ludedimage &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">your tq shoula be at around 180 with those mods, that number is really low</TD></TR></TABLE>

Uhhh no. More like 155-160. Mebbe a little lower.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by raysjdmh22a &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well my red line got move up to 8500, and my peck power where I have to shift is 8100 to hold at 216, I was think about the type s piston but the tuner said it really wont make a big differents maybe 7hp....</TD></TR></TABLE>

Sounds like a dumb thing for a tuner to say. You dont get higher compression pistons for horsepower you get em for torque...Dude trust me ,Type S pistons will work wonders for your set up.

 

SAME HERE....GOOD LUCK....WHY DIDN'T YOU DO ALL THOSE SETUP IN THE BEGINNING....?

 

 

SAME HERE....GOOD LUCK....WHY DIDN'T YOU DO ALL THOSE SETUP IN THE BEGINNING....?

cause I figure that the high compression flat valves were good enough to lift my compression a little, but I going to get the type s piston and the RMF header and retune it, what do you guy I might gain in in those 2 things? and off the topic I'm going to sell my jdm FGK header if anybody interested let me know

 

My expectation for the type s and rmf would be in the range of 205-215 on a mustang dyno, but you are already at 216 ....so now I'm scratching my head. Your tq numbers seem ok for the mustang dyno though.

 

Do you think I will make more power with the RMF header, making more then 216?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by raysjdmh22a &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Do you think I will make more power with the RMF header, making more then 216?</TD></TR></TABLE>

definitely.