Enkei RPF1 rimzz
judging by Enkei's chart on their website it looks like only the 17's will fit.......
http://www.enkei.com/RacingSeriesSpecs/RPF1.html
17x7.5 48 front
17x8 45 rear
edit: looking at that pic, the front fender looks rolled
http://www.enkei.com/RacingSeriesSpecs/RPF1.html
17x7.5 48 front
17x8 45 rear
edit: looking at that pic, the front fender looks rolled
http://www.s2ki.com/forums/ind...t=675
Check that out. It's 17x9 +45 all the way around. I'd like to see those wheels in a non-fender rolling size.
Modified by RacerXI at 10:03 AM 2/1/2006
Check that out. It's 17x9 +45 all the way around. I'd like to see those wheels in a non-fender rolling size.
Modified by RacerXI at 10:03 AM 2/1/2006
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Francesco »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">those rims are ok...they just look cheap to me...enkei makes such nicer rims...</TD></TR></TABLE>
thats cause they are cheap... you can get a set of 4 for under a grand... great for track wheels tho. they are really light... around 13lbs each for the 17's..
thats cause they are cheap... you can get a set of 4 for under a grand... great for track wheels tho. they are really light... around 13lbs each for the 17's..
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by S2K K1DD »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">whats the company that makes similar wheels...right on the tip of my tounge just cant remember??</TD></TR></TABLE>
racing hart cp-035
racing hart cp-035
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Francesco »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">look at that picture really good...the front tires stick out even or father than the fender...not safe
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Why itsn't that safe? I now his offset is like +45 with 17x9, but what about a different setup like 16x7 with an offset of 43.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Why itsn't that safe? I now his offset is like +45 with 17x9, but what about a different setup like 16x7 with an offset of 43.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by papa5murf »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">16x7 +43 will be fine</TD></TR></TABLE>
do they make RPF1 in 16 x 7 with correct offset?
do they make RPF1 in 16 x 7 with correct offset?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by freeagent32 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Why itsn't that safe? I now his offset is like +45 with 17x9, but what about a different setup like 16x7 with an offset of 43.</TD></TR></TABLE>
because you will have a fender crisis if your low and they hit the wells looking like that...
the +43's will work...
Why itsn't that safe? I now his offset is like +45 with 17x9, but what about a different setup like 16x7 with an offset of 43.</TD></TR></TABLE>
because you will have a fender crisis if your low and they hit the wells looking like that...
the +43's will work...
Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
From: I Dont Care How They Do It In Japan...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 95dc2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
do they make RPF1 in 16 x 7 with correct offset?</TD></TR></TABLE>
You can special order in any offset and size!!!
do they make RPF1 in 16 x 7 with correct offset?</TD></TR></TABLE>
You can special order in any offset and size!!!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Francesco »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">look at that picture really good...the front tires stick out even or father than the fender...not safe
</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Francesco »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">because you will have a fender crisis if your low and they hit the wells looking like that...</TD></TR></TABLE>
No offense, but you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
Why would anyone in their right mind put 16x7 wheels on a S2K and consider it an upgrade?
</TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Francesco »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">because you will have a fender crisis if your low and they hit the wells looking like that...</TD></TR></TABLE>
No offense, but you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
Why would anyone in their right mind put 16x7 wheels on a S2K and consider it an upgrade?
damn those look ******* hard on ur s2k man..
really dont' really like them much on eg's..
but on the s2k they look really great.
like how fat they are.. they peek out from under the fenders some, hehe, nice.
really dont' really like them much on eg's..
but on the s2k they look really great.
like how fat they are.. they peek out from under the fenders some, hehe, nice.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by papa5murf »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thats cause they are cheap... you can get a set of 4 for under a grand... great for track wheels tho. they are really light... around 13lbs each for the 17's..</TD></TR></TABLE>
nothin wrong with em being cheap,
**** paying high $$$ for "blingy" crazy looking shiny 8piece wheels,
rivets everywhere.. polished this and that, wierd spoke designs..
screw that,
in my opinion, function is the fashion,
simple wheels with aggressive dimensions, sticky tires,
that looks good cuz you know it performs good
nothin wrong with em being cheap,
**** paying high $$$ for "blingy" crazy looking shiny 8piece wheels,
rivets everywhere.. polished this and that, wierd spoke designs..
screw that,
in my opinion, function is the fashion,
simple wheels with aggressive dimensions, sticky tires,
that looks good cuz you know it performs good
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMish_Roots »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the wheels look sick on that S!!
but i dont like the fact that they stick oput further than the fender....
</TD></TR></TABLE>
glad im not the only one that saw this...
you can't have that, good forbid you hit a major bump and your fenders might have a crisis...
but i dont like the fact that they stick oput further than the fender....
</TD></TR></TABLE>glad im not the only one that saw this...
you can't have that, good forbid you hit a major bump and your fenders might have a crisis...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ITRbroham »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Ahhhhhhhhh..........I give up.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i think franks issue is more on the fact that the fender could be damaged.. (which is really easy to do..) ... and the fact that the tire could get shredded by the edge of the fender (which would be hard to do)
</TD></TR></TABLE>i think franks issue is more on the fact that the fender could be damaged.. (which is really easy to do..) ... and the fact that the tire could get shredded by the edge of the fender (which would be hard to do)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by papa5murf »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i think franks issue is more on the fact that the fender could be damaged.. (which is really easy to do..) ... and the fact that the tire could get shredded by the edge of the fender (which would be hard to do)</TD></TR></TABLE>
I guess no one realizes the fenders are flared from the pic?
i think franks issue is more on the fact that the fender could be damaged.. (which is really easy to do..) ... and the fact that the tire could get shredded by the edge of the fender (which would be hard to do)</TD></TR></TABLE>
I guess no one realizes the fenders are flared from the pic?


