pros/cons of an crx Si

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 01:19 PM
  #1  
nosaj.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
From: The Battle of Los Angeles
Default pros/cons of an crx Si

well this is my first actually thread..didnt know wehre to post this. my bros friend is selling an crx Si, but i've always wanted a dx or hf. price is pretty decent and car is somewhat clean (just a few things to fix, nothign big). so i wanna hear some pros and cons of having an Si..
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 01:27 PM
  #2  
gnar kill's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
From: Great Mills, MD 20634
Default Re: pros/cons of an crx Si (cr.sex.)

cons...it is heavier....

pros 90-91 have rear disc brakes, the seats are sexy as hell, its mpfi,1.6 vs a 1.5, better tranny, has a tach in the gauge cluster
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 01:31 PM
  #3  
AJxr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 2
From: NY, USA
Default Re: pros/cons of an crx Si (gnar kill)

moonroof!
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 01:34 PM
  #4  
nosaj.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
From: The Battle of Los Angeles
Default Re: pros/cons of an crx Si (AJxr)

what can i do to get rid of the moonroof? i was thinking glasstop maybe.haha but i wanan get into road racing/autocross..so that out of the question..
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 01:57 PM
  #5  
boylovecar's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 244
Likes: 1
From: califas, ca, usa
Default Re: pros/cons of an crx Si (cr.sex.)

there's a guy on ebay who sells a plexiglass kit to get rid of moonroof/sunroof. check it out it's kinda neat.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 02:05 PM
  #6  
bigcalidave's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: Redding, CA, USA
Default

If you are gonna be doing the Auto-x get the si. Saves you time and money, and you will be stripping out all the weight anyways. You start out with the disc brakes, mpfi (do the D15b vtec swap) it's a great car. If the price is good, don't keep shopping around.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 02:08 PM
  #7  
boylovecar's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 244
Likes: 1
From: califas, ca, usa
Default Re: pros/cons of an crx Si (cr.sex.)

hf 1967lbs dx 2103 lbs si 2174 lbs

dx has no tach, dp pgm-fi, no rear disc brakes

hf no rear disc brakes, coeffeciency drag of .29, dx and si at .30,

si front & rear stabizer bars, sport suspension, front rear disc brakes, overall stronger chassis. no cons to having an si other than added weight due to reinforced chassis and commodities/niceties both performance and comfort related.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 02:24 PM
  #8  
crxnj's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,866
Likes: 1
From: nj
Default Re: pros/cons of an crx Si (gnar kill)


<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gnar kill &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">cons...it is heavier....

,better tranny, has a tach in the gauge cluster</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boylovecar &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hf 1967lbs dx 2103 lbs si 2174 lbs

dx has no tach, </TD></TR></TABLE>


All 88-91 crx si/dx/hf models have tachs.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 02:39 PM
  #9  
boylovecar's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 244
Likes: 1
From: califas, ca, usa
Default Re: pros/cons of an crx Si (Mr.speaker)

that's weird, my last 88 dx crx didn't. you think maybe not all crx's of all years didn't neccessarily get a tach?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 02:41 PM
  #10  
boylovecar's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 244
Likes: 1
From: califas, ca, usa
Default Re: pros/cons of an crx Si (boylovecar)

to be fair though the brochure for 91 does state that all three models did have a tach. but the question stands.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 03:16 PM
  #11  
Mr.Chow's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,077
Likes: 0
From: small town, WI, USA
Default Re: pros/cons of an crx Si (boylovecar)

some of the Ef hatchbacks didnt have a tech. I believe all crxs did though
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 03:40 PM
  #12  
si0385.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
From: tampa sometimes naples, FL
Default Re: pros/cons of an crx Si (Mr.Chow)

cant forget the crx si door pannels... they say crx on them look alot better

and didint the stock crx si have a more of a high flow muffler on it and a more powerfull fuel pump???
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 03:49 PM
  #13  
fireant's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,116
Likes: 2
Default Re: pros/cons of an crx Si (jaydeum4lyfe)

For G-stock or Street Touring 2 autocross, get the Si.... any year will do.

For any other class, where you can swap the motor or the transmission parts, go with a DX or HF.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 04:06 PM
  #14  
D Rex's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: san diego, ca, usa
Default Re: pros/cons of an crx Si (cr.sex.)

SI has rear sway bar also
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2006 | 04:32 PM
  #15  
rsca_crx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 1
From: downshifting into 5th,, nyc, usa
Default Re: (bigcalidave)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bigcalidave &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If you are gonna be doing the Auto-x get the si. Saves you time and money, and you will be stripping out all the weight anyways. You start out with the disc brakes, mpfi (do the D15b vtec swap) it's a great car. If the price is good, don't keep shopping around.</TD></TR></TABLE>

2006 has some hope!

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fireant &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">For G-stock or Street Touring 2 autocross, get the Si.... any year will do.
For any other class, where you can swap the motor or the transmission parts, go with a DX or HF.</TD></TR></TABLE>

i'm going to have to disagree here. you are 100% correct for someone with a lot of autox experience, or someone building a dedicated car, but that doesn't seem to be the case here.

the si is absolutely the best platform to start with here, regardless of other factors.

stock, it is no comparison as a dd or autox car, and any class that allows motor swaps is going to be a terrible place to start learning how to dodge cones.

you may not care now about winning( which is good, because you won't be winning in most places), but if you are like most normal people you will care about getting better and not looking stupid.

the best thing to do, imho, is to get a stock si and get some seat time. then if you decide you like it, get a rulebook and build for a street class, excluding sm2 for now. search the ax/rr forum and you will find rock solid advice previously given to lots of people who had the same questions before.

later you will have a car that can be built to fit into a lot of good classes (i still think i had the most fun in csp) and you will have learned a lot more. a limited car simply can't hide the mistakes that big sticky rubber (csp) or healthy power (sm2 or mod) can and you'll get better faster.

Reply
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 04:13 PM
  #16  
charliev's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI, Wayne
Default

you could get a fiberglass or CF plug for the sunroof deal!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRXSiA1
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
15
Nov 5, 2004 02:07 PM
madhatter07
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
5
Mar 1, 2004 09:40 AM
DarkZachiel
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
4
Feb 19, 2004 08:35 PM
civicmark
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
4
Jul 13, 2003 08:45 PM
t o m
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
22
May 10, 2002 12:05 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:14 PM.