Low compression numbers on b18c??
Ive got a JDM b18c gsr and decided to do a compression test (completly stock internally). I did it at WOT with a warm motor. It came out as 192 - 192 - 189 - 190 with a tester from autozone. Ah... are these numbers bad?? Someone told me that different gauges would give different numbers but... Im not sure if I believe that or not. What do you guys think? thanks
different compression do give different numbers....i have 230 across with my gsr at 200k miles.....those numbers do seem low but atleast its pretty even...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Stripped Honda »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> those #'s are fine i have seen new itr motors with compression about that high</TD></TR></TABLE>
serious? my jdm itr had about 255-260 across...and ive seen other itr on that range too...never seen itr that low before....
serious? my jdm itr had about 255-260 across...and ive seen other itr on that range too...never seen itr that low before....
Trending Topics
well unless there was variance would there be need to check for that??? didnt think a wet compression test was in order unless there was discrepency with the first dry test..
Compression test = Good at telling you that you have compression.
Leakdown test = Good at telling you if you have any problems (Worn rings, bad valve guide seals, bad headgasket, bent/burnt valves).
Compression tests serve a purpose, but will not always tell you if your engine has a problem.
Leakdown test = Good at telling you if you have any problems (Worn rings, bad valve guide seals, bad headgasket, bent/burnt valves).
Compression tests serve a purpose, but will not always tell you if your engine has a problem.
thats not true...if there is variance youd have a problem...havent seen a car with horrible rings give solid compression across all cylinders...compression is related to your rings sealing ability...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by lVlemphizStylez »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well unless there was variance would there be need to check for that??? didnt think a wet compression test was in order unless there was discrepency with the first dry test..</TD></TR></TABLE>
Although unlikely, they could all be leaking equally. I still think he is fine.
Although unlikely, they could all be leaking equally. I still think he is fine.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by lVlemphizStylez »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thats not true...if there is variance youd have a problem...havent seen a car with horrible rings give solid compression across all cylinders...compression is related to your rings sealing ability...</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by KooK »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Compression tests serve a purpose, but will not always tell you if your engine has a problem.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I didn't say compression tests were useless, but there have been engines that produce good compression test results while still having bad rings. The real difference is that the compression tester will raise slower on the cylinders with the bad rings. You're right in saying that normally compression results will vary, but you're better off using a leakdown tester to tell you more exact numbers and whether your engine is having problems or not.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by KooK »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Compression tests serve a purpose, but will not always tell you if your engine has a problem.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I didn't say compression tests were useless, but there have been engines that produce good compression test results while still having bad rings. The real difference is that the compression tester will raise slower on the cylinders with the bad rings. You're right in saying that normally compression results will vary, but you're better off using a leakdown tester to tell you more exact numbers and whether your engine is having problems or not.
yea i know..so you would have to compare it to the dry test right? do the dry test first...oil it up...then do the test again...and compare the #'s? just clearing my head up
if you do it dry and there is variance ...if you go back and do it wet and the compression goes up in a cylinder then the rings are bad in that cylinder
The Helms manual states that the nominal or ideal cylinder pressure is 270 with a minimum acceptable value of 135 and a maximum variation among pressure readings across all four cylinders of 28.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




