T3 .60/.48 worth it over a T3 .42/.48?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 01:41 PM
  #1  
EK k kay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,555
Likes: 4
From: Seattle
Default T3 .60/.48 worth it over a T3 .42/.48?

My goal is 200whp daily driven and I was wondering if the T3 .60/.48 is worth it over a T3 .42/.48? The .60/.48 is $200 more than what I'd be able to buy a .42/.48 for. A buddy of mine made good whp and wtq @ 8psi with a .42/.48, but it stopped making power after 6k or so on a stock z6. Is the 60 trim worth it?




Modified by EK k kay at 3:38 PM 12/22/2005
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 02:25 PM
  #2  
InfamousDC2FI's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
From: OR
Default Re: T3 .60/.48 worth it over a T3 .42/.48? (EK k kay)

for what motor?

west coast turbo has remanufactured t3's for $299 and t3/t4's for $399 -- not too bad of a deal if u ask me.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 02:25 PM
  #3  
...esteban's Avatar
Princess
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,123
Likes: 17
From: ATX
Default Re: T3 .60/.48 worth it over a T3 .42/.48? (EK k kay)

Very much so...especially for that 200whp goal...
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 02:26 PM
  #4  
EK k kay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,555
Likes: 4
From: Seattle
Default Re: T3 .60/.48 worth it over a T3 .42/.48? (...Lost)

Ahh I knew I forgot something. It's a y7/y8 mini me. Pretty much consider it a y8.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 02:29 PM
  #5  
InfamousDC2FI's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
From: OR
Default Re: T3 .60/.48 worth it over a T3 .42/.48? (EK k kay)

ya i think it would defintley be worth it cause it would make more power
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 02:35 PM
  #6  
EK k kay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,555
Likes: 4
From: Seattle
Default Re: T3 .60/.48 worth it over a T3 .42/.48? (InfamousDC2FI)

I don't really want to spend too much for this project unless the part is really necessary.. That $200 might be better spent on a clutch. Still undecided.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 02:35 PM
  #7  
EJ1 wilcox's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,735
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Default Re: T3 .60/.48 worth it over a T3 .42/.48? (InfamousDC2FI)

I had a .48/.60 on my d16z6 and it pulled hard all the way to the redline and felt like it wanted to keep on pulling. There was no drop in torque at the 10-12psi I was running.

I say go with the 48/60, because of the larger compressor it will take less boost to get to your goals.

Less boost on a larger compressor > more boost from a smaller compressor

It creates less heat at the same power level.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 02:36 PM
  #8  
EK k kay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,555
Likes: 4
From: Seattle
Default Re: T3 .60/.48 worth it over a T3 .42/.48? (EJ1 wilcox)

^ do you have any dynos?

I should also mention that dyno above was at 8psi..
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 02:39 PM
  #9  
EJ1 wilcox's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,735
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Default Re: T3 .60/.48 worth it over a T3 .42/.48? (EK k kay)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EK k kay &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">^ do you have any dynos?</TD></TR></TABLE>

No, I really wish I did though.

I tuned it on the street and never got around to taking it to the dyno for numbers.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 03:21 PM
  #10  
beerbongskickass's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 1
From: WA
Default Re: T3 .60/.48 worth it over a T3 .42/.48? (EJ1 wilcox)

Go with the .60/.48...

That's what I have and it's perfect for stock d-series motors. My buddy had a .42/.48 and switched to the .60/.48 and he defintely noticed the difference on the top end.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 05:45 PM
  #11  
blackeg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,820
Likes: 12
From: schooling kids in ny, usa
Default Re: T3 .60/.48 worth it over a T3 .42/.48? (beerbongskickass)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by beerbongskickass &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Go with the .60/.48...

That's what I have and it's perfect for stock d-series motors. </TD></TR></TABLE>




thats what i ran on my z6. it was very well matched to the motor
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 07:54 PM
  #12  
Joseph Davis's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
From: ashEVILle, NC, USSR
Default Re: T3 .60/.48 worth it over a T3 .42/.48? (beerbongskickass)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by beerbongskickass &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Go with the .60/.48... </TD></TR></TABLE>

I'd go .60/.63. The OEM aka "stage 1" turbine wheel is still pretty tiny, it's not like the usual "stage 3" turbine wheel in the T3/T04E hybrids that's half again as big.

You could get Mister Westcoast-Turbo to cough up a .60/.63 with "stage 2" turbine and have something about as well matched, spool wise, to a D16 as a .57/.63 T04E hybrid with "stage 3" turbine is on a GSR or LS/VTEC. And not so restrictive that it kills off your power if you want to use the .60 trim's 300 whp worth of airflow.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 08:01 PM
  #13  
Bseriescivic5's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 0
From: Mid atlantic
Default

id have to agree go ahead with the .60 You guys will laugh at me but i run a .42/.48 on my b16 lol trust me she runs outta breath real quick on the DOHC Vtec head.....but spools redic and great low end power.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 08:40 PM
  #14  
Joseph Davis's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
From: ashEVILle, NC, USSR
Default Re: (Bseriescivic5)

I ran the .50 trim .42/.48 on my LS and liked it a lot. When I switched to the .60/.63, while there were power gains up top, there were flat just power gains all over the place. Only increased spool 500 rpms, and I added the 24X11X4" ghetto FMIC which has a lot more internal volume than the "600 hp" Precision (to pull a name out of my ***) ICs. Most of that spool was probably in the IC...

Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 09:18 PM
  #15  
stealthmode62's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
From: Farmington, MN, USA
Default Re: (J. Davis)

I had a 48/60 on my y8, and it was a great turbo. The 42/48 is ok, but don't attempt to get anykind of big top end out of it. It'll be boring after a week. lol. Save the hassle and skip the 48/60 all together. 63/60 is a ball of joy.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #16  
HiProfile's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 7
From: b00sting my D16s, SoWis, USA
Default Re: (J. Davis)

The 50 trim isn't exactly the reason for top-end loss, certainly when you're only around 200whp. On a D16 it's partly the head's flow restriction and the cam. It also has to do with the .48AR of the turbine housing. Regardless, I'd go with the 60 trim with .60/.48. A buddy has JDM b16 with a 60trim T3 .60/.63 and was tuned to 250whp by the previous owner at 9psi.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 09:36 PM
  #17  
Joseph Davis's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
From: ashEVILle, NC, USSR
Default Re: (HiProfile)

One of fjt's buddies hit 270 whp on a D16 and .42/.48 "fitty trim" T3. Somewhere around 18 psi or so. You can operate turbos off the main efficiency island and get more than advertised airflow, but charge temps climb. bigwig and I can argue about the turbo's life expectancy, but it's a comparative non-issue.

Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 10:00 PM
  #18  
EK k kay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,555
Likes: 4
From: Seattle
Default Re: (J. Davis)

I appreciate all of your guys input. While my goal is only 200whp with either turbo, hopefully there is a $200 difference that I can feel when I drive my buddies car and mine when I get it boosted.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #19  
stealthmode62's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
From: Farmington, MN, USA
Default Re: (EK k kay)

$200?? I only get my 48/60's from TurboCoupes at junkyards.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 10:32 PM
  #20  
EK k kay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,555
Likes: 4
From: Seattle
Default Re: (stealthmode62)

Well those turbos go for around $300 from my experience. The 42/48 goes for around $100 so $200 difference.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 11:26 PM
  #21  
stealthmode62's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
From: Farmington, MN, USA
Default Re: (EK k kay)

Another thing you can do is get a 42/48 and put a .60 compressor housing on it. Essentially giving you a 48/60. The 42/48's tend to go for less money, and the .60 compressor housings can be found on ebay for around $25. That's what I did on my 91 LS and it worked great.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 11:37 PM
  #22  
HiProfile's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 7
From: b00sting my D16s, SoWis, USA
Default Re: (stealthmode62)

You certainly can try that as well, but it can't be the comp housing off of a 60trim. You'd have over 1/16" extra space around the inducer part of the wheel. Obviously StealthMode got the right one, but both types float around on ebay.

FYI
T3 50trim: inducer = 1.674", exducer = 2.367"
T3 60trim: inducer = 1.830", exducer = 2.367"
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 11:42 PM
  #23  
EK k kay's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,555
Likes: 4
From: Seattle
Default Re: (HiProfile)

Is that easy to do? What kind of gain would it be by doing that?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 11:55 PM
  #24  
stealthmode62's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
From: Farmington, MN, USA
Default Re: (EK k kay)

Unbolt the retaining clips (It's 6 or 8 bolts) and bolt on the new housing. It's that easy. The gain that you would get is a larger compressor housing.

I had a 48/60 that was trash, and a 42/48 that was mint. There's no way I'm putting a 42/48 on my LS, so I took the compressor housing off both of them, and after 25 minutes of staring and measuring, there appears to be no difference in the wheels whatsoever. I put the 60 comp. housing on the 42/48, and did burnouts. It was a lovely situation.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2005 | 11:59 PM
  #25  
stealthmode62's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
From: Farmington, MN, USA
Default Re: (stealthmode62)

Oh, and the (let me think) comp. housing didn't want to mount flush with the 42/48 center section. There's a slight lip difference between the two housings, so when you mount them up the first time, you tighten all the bolts down, and if you try real hard, you can wiggle the housing about 1mm back and forth. I boosted the car like this and she was happy, but I did eventually take the housing off and grind down the lip on the center section just a tad to make the housing tighten all the way.

Ok, that's all I know.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:24 AM.