na or turbo which is bests
i just finshed building a na lsvtec, i ended up sending alot of money on it, i wanted to know i should have had gone turbo instead. i want to know how much money you guys spent on a turbo build and what kind of numbers you got on the dyno and track
Trending Topics
if you want an all around kick *** performance, all motor is the way to go, sure you can hit high numbers with turbo cars, but traction???? when boost hits in, your spinning, bye bye tires, also, its not a constant boost of power throughout the powerband like a nice all motor set-up is, if you want a highway monster, or just 700 hp drag car to run giant slicks on for performance, the fi is for you, but i dont want any lag, and i want a really responsive car with pure raw power, plus you could get any1 to race you, caz na is soo underated. like ender said, na is more of an art, i had a buddy of mine who had a stroked b18c5 with some amazing headwork and 110 octane pushing 260, not sure what he got on the pump gas, but that car would just flat out ******* fly, the response and power out of that was incredible, he had it in an eg and he was beating sti, evo's, supras, c6 vettes, and the 500-600 hp tegs/rex's/civics. traction is key!!!!
alright, if you have anything except a hatch or crx, a great na will be harder to achieve, weight is the enemy for na, but if i had a teg or 4 door or prelude, i would boost, but thats just me, even though there is a sick white jdm type r all motor who ran 12.5 in 1/4 with na
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
InfamousRS
Tech / Misc
16
Jan 16, 2002 06:17 PM



