163whp 122tq all motor b20vtec stock internals
i'll scan the print out today and post it
wat do u guys think?

B17 Head Stock Cams,& Cam Gears
B20B4 Stock Bottom End
B16 tranny
ARP Head Studs
Golden eagle vtec kit
Ebay xtd clutch
Skunk2 Intake Manifold
B&M Fuel pressure and Gauge
Msd-sci-L
H22 Injectors
4-1 Headers
Walbro 255 fuel pump
V-afc

 

Not too bad!

 

Must be fun

 

Id expect to see a little more out of that. Considering ive seen bone stock LS/Vtecs lay down 178 whp

 

my friends b20 vtec put out 185/138. stock block , stock head. with blox IM and vtec controller.

 

My friends old b20vtec put down 197/139. Toda B's, hytech exhaust, toda header.

 

how did you tune it? just through the vafc?

*Edit, also, are those 4th gen or 5th gen H22 injectors?


Modified by IHateJDM at 9:11 AM 12/2/2005

 

what ecu did you use???

 

How's the torque curve? I'm not knocking the B20 at all, but I thought that the B20VTECs would put down MASSIVE (for a honda ) torque numbers.

 

Hondata (chrome, neptune, etc.. just better tuning capabilities), a better header (TODA, Hytec, etc...) would net some series gains over the current setup.

And whats with the torque? What kind of dyno was this on? If on a mustang dyno then these are pretty good numbers!

 

im On Stock GSR ECU,they didnt finish tunning the vafc,i was there just to see how much it pulled,one hour,(bristoldyno.com) ,next time i go i'll pay for tunning.



Not the best quality but thats it.
thanks!

 

do you know if you have the 345 cc H injectors or the 290 cc injectors? With that walbro 255, and no real tuning, your ecu looks to be having a hard time with the a/f ratio.


Modified by IHateJDM at 10:43 AM 12/2/2005

 

 

A:F is all over the place. Even tuinng the vafc out more could get your near 170. good luck.

 

damn, i wouldnt kno ,my friend said they came out of a 97 prelude h22?
Wat should i do go back to smaller injectors
?

 

97 lude would be 290 cc, which isn't bad. Just get it tuned, and you'll be good.

 

if your only spinning it to 8k, that's why the tq is low with that skunk2 manifold. not designed for that rev limit.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JerseySiPOS &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">if your only spinning it to 8k, that's why the tq is low with that skunk2 manifold. not designed for that rev limit.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Def not, but the big bores breath harder so im not so sure it would have quite as big of an effect on powerband as it would on an 1.8.

Not sure though

 

B20Bs have low compression, hence the low numbers.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93EG6SI &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">B20Bs have low compression, hence the low numbers. </TD></TR></TABLE>

wow

 

what part of Mass you in?

 

Raise the compression with new pistons and re-sleeve. That thing will be near 175 to 180 hp with 133 ft-lb.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JerseySiPOS &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">if your only spinning it to 8k, that's why the tq is low with that skunk2 manifold. not designed for that rev limit.</TD></TR></TABLE>i spon mine between 8500 and 8800 rpms, and my torque curve didn't get better with the revs. i wish it would stay staight, al the way to 8000. but i'm only using a aebs intake manifold, i'll have to try a better manifold and see if that changes!

 

Mike-B. its me Rob, u dropped the ls in my crx , im mannys friend...
Rememeber the water pump, i had to go back to b20-timing belt and water pump...i still have urs just havent had the time to bring it back to u, plus i got to see u soon bout my ecu....

Any Body needs work done talk to &gt;Mike_B&lt;
http://angeltowns.com/town/mik....html


Modified by 1SickHb at 12:42 PM 12/3/2005

 

and all those high numbers are prolly because the block are b20z not b20b4......