Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack Road Racing / AUTOX, HPDE, Time Attack

importance of static lower control arm angles?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 07:58 PM
  #1  
azian21485's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: chicago, il, usa
Default importance of static lower control arm angles?

After trying to research online and carroll smith's "tune to win" i can't figure out the importance of having the lower control arms parallel with the ground - a common myth or fact with no real reason that's been spread around

they say, that if you go too low, it's bad to have your lower control arms at an angle

smith stated "Naturally, there is no law that states that unequal and parrallel links must be parallel to the ground at ride height" ....on our production cars, we use an unequal and non parallel links but i would assume that the above statement applies to our cars as well...except our upper control arms will naturally be at an upward angle

so i constructed the cutout model, and made it go through some motions but i can't figure out how it would effect anything:

at bump: both wheels go negative

at droop: both wheels go positive

at roll: outside wheel goes positive, inside wheel goes negative

I'm aware that since the upper control arm travels at a faster arc, it is the one that changes camber more drastically, but where does the lower control arm come into play?
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 08:39 PM
  #2  
Johnny Mac's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 1
From: Cerritos, CA, USA
Default Re: importance of static lower control arm angles? (azian21485)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by azian21485 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I'm aware that since the upper control arm travels at a faster arc, it is the one that changes camber more drastically, but where does the lower control arm come into play?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Both it's length and static angle relative to groud plane (as reference) affects both the instantaneous roll center position in space and the migration of the roll center as the suspension moves.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2005 | 07:03 AM
  #3  
Jack Black's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
From: 15 percent slip, FL, USA
Default Re: importance of static lower control arm angles? (azian21485)

It has to do with the location of the roll center. Traditionally, the ideal location for the roll center is at ground level. If the roll center is above ground, you get upward jacking forces, which raise the car as you go around a corner and cause more weight transfer. If it is below ground, then the distance between the CG and the roll center is greater than necessary and you get excess body roll. You also get downward jacking forces, which can be a problem if you're already running a very low ride height.

If the lower control arms are parallel to the ground, then you're guaranteed to have a roll center that is low and slightly above ground. In other words, near optimal.

All that being said, the amount of lowering that is even possible on our cars is not likely to cause the roll center to drop far enough to cause any problems.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2005 | 07:26 AM
  #4  
azian21485's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: chicago, il, usa
Default Re: importance of static lower control arm angles? (Johnny Mac)

awesome, thanks guys
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
702SI
Suspension & Brakes
7
May 12, 2017 07:00 AM
DNA-Motoring
Wheels, Tires, Brakes, and Suspension
237
Mar 30, 2015 10:31 AM
Jaydeep
Honda Civic (2001 - 2005)
1
Aug 8, 2010 08:30 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:01 AM.