Cable>>Hydro tranny conversion...
What exactly do I need for the conversion besides the Hasport kit? I have a 1990 Si hatch and plan to do a B20/V-TEC swap into it with an S80 LSD tranny. Any help such as a list would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Trending Topics
The EFB2 is the answer, along with the needed shift linkage as it sounds like you are still running the stock set up and don't have one.
You would also need the rear transmission mount bracket, unless the engine you have came with it, or are planning on buying has it.
You would also need the rear transmission mount bracket, unless the engine you have came with it, or are planning on buying has it.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jdmcars.com »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The EFB2 is the answer, along with the needed shift linkage as it sounds like you are still running the stock set up and don't have one.
You would also need the rear transmission mount bracket, unless the engine you have came with it, or are planning on buying has it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yea, forgot about the DA rear tranny bracket (and then you have to drill the holes out a little bit. Also, you will need a DA driver side motor bracket (the one that bolts the block to the mount).
You would also need the rear transmission mount bracket, unless the engine you have came with it, or are planning on buying has it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yea, forgot about the DA rear tranny bracket (and then you have to drill the holes out a little bit. Also, you will need a DA driver side motor bracket (the one that bolts the block to the mount).
I was informed that the Hasport kit only allowed me to mount the hydro tranny. I was talking about actually using the hydraulic system, this seems as it's still using cable. I wondered why no one said anything about lines or cylinders...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NINE9DC4 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I was informed that the Hasport kit only allowed me to mount the hydro tranny. I was talking about actually using the hydraulic system, this seems as it's still using cable. I wondered why no one said anything about lines or cylinders...</TD></TR></TABLE>
Because the Hasport kit eliminates these. Basically, the Hasport kit converts a hydraulic transmission to cable operation. It includes an actuator that bolts where the slave cylinder bolts that actually disengages the clutch using the cable. If you want to go completely hydraulic, then you are on your own when it comes to using the hydraulic system.
Because the Hasport kit eliminates these. Basically, the Hasport kit converts a hydraulic transmission to cable operation. It includes an actuator that bolts where the slave cylinder bolts that actually disengages the clutch using the cable. If you want to go completely hydraulic, then you are on your own when it comes to using the hydraulic system.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NINE9DC4 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I understand what you're saying, but it's still going to shift like a regular cable tranny, rough as all hell.</TD></TR></TABLE>
????
I never had any problems with my cable tranny and haven't had any (other than a bad bearing) in my hydro tranny.
I prefer cable over hydro anyway. More adjustability and better "feel." It's like a direct connection b/w my foot and the tranny.
????
I never had any problems with my cable tranny and haven't had any (other than a bad bearing) in my hydro tranny.
I prefer cable over hydro anyway. More adjustability and better "feel." It's like a direct connection b/w my foot and the tranny.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,697
Likes: 0
From: R.I.P Brian Arbogast...you will be missed, maryland, USA
i have the efb2 hasport kit in my hatch with a hydro gsr trans. the clutch is hard to press cause of my pp. but the kit works great. its hasport. but like said b4 you will not use any of the hydro parts in your car at all. also you don't need to use a DA teg clutch cable
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 88 rex »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I prefer cable over hydro anyway. More adjustability and better "feel." It's like a direct connection b/w my foot and the tranny.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree
I prefer cable over hydro anyway. More adjustability and better "feel." It's like a direct connection b/w my foot and the tranny.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1QwIkEf »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> also you don't need to use a DA teg clutch cable</TD></TR></TABLE>
True, but the DA cable allows for more adjustment on the tranny side.
True, but the DA cable allows for more adjustment on the tranny side.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dr4zz
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
2
Aug 11, 2009 05:11 AM
TheBetterSol
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
Jan 6, 2005 07:30 PM
som3on3_10
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
5
Jun 17, 2004 08:28 PM



