Schu


Modified by MSchu at 8:29 PM 11/21/2005

 

it would be nice if the graph was more focused on the relavent range rather then having alot of not need space, that would also give you a better idea of what the lines look like.

there appears to be little difference between max and min on the bumb, but more on the rebound side. Are bump and rebound done on the same adjustment? again it would be nice to a more of a relivent range.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by slammed_93_hatch &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">it would be nice if the graph was more focused on the relavent range rather then having alot of not need space, that would also give you a better idea of what the lines look like.</TD></TR></TABLE>

 

2812's.


What are they valved for spring rate wise?

 

yeap 2812's... valved for 10k ish rates

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MSchu &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeap 2812's... valved for 10k ish rates </TD></TR></TABLE>

first time i have ever heard of koni's spring rate vavling used in metric terms, not that it makes a difference just its funny.

Im trying to decide between 2812's and 3011's, ill most likely being going with 3011's though, i don't think i really need 2812's

 

the Swift springs I am buying are metric, why would that seem weird, they also have an ID of 65mm is that wierd? your better off with the 3011's they will stronger for a harsh driving style

 

I would be interested to know who ran the dyno test and what valving is in the shocks. As mentioned above, it would have been helpful had they better scaled the printout. Also had they chosen some data collection point below .05 m/s or approx. 2 in/s then you would have better seen the low speed damping and the adjustment range.

 

thanks lee... I do believe Koni ran the tests. Tom fowler put together the set up for me, does that help you out at all?