Stock TT supra, that's all.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
From: GA
Stock TT supra, that's all.
I post these only to show off a pretty nice car. Plenty quick stock. Out of my friends budget to make it go much faster like he'd like to. Accel Junky is on here and it's his car. He is looking for serious buyers, but that's not what my post is about. I understand some were oversharpened. But hey, check them out.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
From: GA
Re: Stock TT supra, that's all. (life sux die)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by life sux die »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not bad. you should've used a tripod. 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I didn't feel it necessary to tell you I used a tripod. Two photos were 30 second exposure times just about. My exif data was removed on accident actually.
</TD></TR></TABLE>I didn't feel it necessary to tell you I used a tripod. Two photos were 30 second exposure times just about. My exif data was removed on accident actually.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,587
Likes: 1
From: Land of the SkanKz Cali 562, Ca, USA
Re: Stock TT supra, that's all. (theSYNDICATE)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by theSYNDICATE »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">SOOOO sexxxy 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Trending Topics
Trial User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 0
From: HELLA NORCAL, USA
Re: (Jobe16)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jobe16 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">way too dark and white balance is off.</TD></TR></TABLE>
wow..at least give credit where its due. the pics arent THAT bad...
nice pics and car
wow..at least give credit where its due. the pics arent THAT bad...
nice pics and car
RIP 1032
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,854
Likes: 0
From: A Touge Near You. 909 SoCal Represent.
Re: Stock TT supra, that's all. (B16_madman)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B16_madman »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I didn't feel it necessary to tell you I used a tripod. Two photos were 30 second exposure times just about. My exif data was removed on accident actually.</TD></TR></TABLE>
are you saying you did use a tripod, or didn't? use a remote or a timer next time if you did. the pics look a little fuzzy.
are you saying you did use a tripod, or didn't? use a remote or a timer next time if you did. the pics look a little fuzzy.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, Wa, USA
I'm not saying they are horrible, I just say that they are too dark and the white balance is off. Its called critisiscm, if I were to say "omfg, your pics suck, why didnt your mom abort you as a fetus" then, that would be flaming. Learn the difference.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
From: GA
Re: (Jobe16)
Heck I'd take flaming as criticism if it had reasoning behind it. Yes, they were a bit soft. I used a wired remote even sir. Maybe my post processing isn't the best ( I know it isn't) and that the kit lense isn't the sharpest glass in the Canon box.
The whitebalance is how we saw it, so it's a bit warmer than what you are used to seeing. The pictures were at dusk/dark.
The whitebalance is how we saw it, so it's a bit warmer than what you are used to seeing. The pictures were at dusk/dark.
not bad
