Anyone know the stock 1/4 mi time for 02 rsx

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TuRdCrX &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Anyone know the stock 1/4 mi time for 02 rsx</TD></TR></TABLE>

No

http://www.albeedigital.com/su....html

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Slow EJ8 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

No

http://www.albeedigital.com/su....html </TD></TR></TABLE>

there are a lot of times on the page that aren't accurate.

Like how the 02 runs a 14.8 and the 03 runs a 15.2 ... even though they are exactly the same.

a 2003 s2000 runs a 14.9? yeah, ok.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by aznboysrfr &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">there are a lot of times on the page that aren't accurate.

Like how the 02 runs a 14.8 and the 03 runs a 15.2 ... even though they are exactly the same.

a 2003 s2000 runs a 14.9? yeah, ok.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yea you are right about the accuracy. Still its better than nothing.

The 02 and 03 difference is actually representative of what the average range is 14.8 - 15.2 ish. The S2k on the other hand, well that driver must have sucked.

 

14.1 is a good time for a s2k if the driver can drive. 14.8 is a good number for the dc5.

 

being a fatass like me, if i drove an s2k, id hit 14.1

high 13's sounds about right though with a "good" driver.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TuRdCrX &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Anyone know the stock 1/4 mi time for 02 rsx</TD></TR></TABLE>
Base model: upper 15's
Type-S: low 15's, upper 14's