3" VS. 2.75" AEM Cold Air Intake Performance Difference
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,583
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
I've been here on H-T for almost 5 years now and this is my first All-Motor Forum post as I am no longer boosted. Here's the dilemma: I'm curious if anyone has any experience with the performance differences between the two on the same application. I'm trying to figure out the performance gain VS. price correlation! I can get a GS-R 2.75" CAI for $100 OR $160 for the ITR 3" model.
Modified by Slick GS-R at 10:48 PM 11/14/2005
Modified by Slick GS-R at 10:48 PM 11/14/2005
I personally would go with the 3"
AEM's are infamous for their hump of power at 4-5k rpm, nice for the street but not very usefull on the track. The problem is they tune the harmonic resonance for that location, instead of in your powerband.
Now with a larger diameter it is going to shift when that occurs to a higher location. Hopefully with in your powerband instead of just before it.
AEM's are infamous for their hump of power at 4-5k rpm, nice for the street but not very usefull on the track. The problem is they tune the harmonic resonance for that location, instead of in your powerband.
Now with a larger diameter it is going to shift when that occurs to a higher location. Hopefully with in your powerband instead of just before it.
I am very interested to see your dyno results with the victor x mani on that build. I would say the ITR intake because its designed for the ITR powerband; more high rpm power. I would think with the victor X manifold you will be more interested in 6500+ rpm range power gains and the 3" would compliment that well.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Slick GS-R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Nobody has any experience with this?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Try looking at this thread, it might help:
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1194241
Try looking at this thread, it might help:
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1194241
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mohsin »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not really in relation to the thread, but is the AEM V2 3" piping?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's actually a combination of 2 different pipe diameters and lengths all wrapped up in one. I think it's a combination 2.75" and 3.5" diameters sleeved over one another.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's actually a combination of 2 different pipe diameters and lengths all wrapped up in one. I think it's a combination 2.75" and 3.5" diameters sleeved over one another.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,518
Likes: 0
From: chillin in that city called queen creek, but homes the atl
this topic has a good point someone should do a dyno comparison of the 2 intake arms and see if the 3'' really out performs the 2.5'' aem intake arm but using a stock bore t-body
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,583
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by street dreams »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">this topic has a good point someone should do a dyno comparison of the 2 intake arms and see if the 3'' really out performs the 2.5'' aem intake arm but using a stock bore t-body</TD></TR></TABLE>
I just bought the 3" Type R AEM Cold Air so if someone has a 2.75" GS-R AEM model they wanted to lend me I would be will to dyno the two back to back to get some evidence for this post!
I just bought the 3" Type R AEM Cold Air so if someone has a 2.75" GS-R AEM model they wanted to lend me I would be will to dyno the two back to back to get some evidence for this post!
Any more feedback on this.
I am trying to design a velocity stack, for those who saw my velocity stack analysis thread. I assumed my intake was 3", but turns out to be 2.75". So I am designing a prototype around 2.75" intake. But want to get some input on intake plumbing size for N/A hondas before I commit to designing a v stack for both 2.75 and 3, or simply uping my own intake pipe and prototype a 3 inch version.
I am trying to design a velocity stack, for those who saw my velocity stack analysis thread. I assumed my intake was 3", but turns out to be 2.75". So I am designing a prototype around 2.75" intake. But want to get some input on intake plumbing size for N/A hondas before I commit to designing a v stack for both 2.75 and 3, or simply uping my own intake pipe and prototype a 3 inch version.
try both, but a short ram tube, but i know it sucks when your looking for 1 particular thing, and your on a budget, so both is out of the question i guess.
i wanna say try the 2.75" first, but regardless, you can't go wrong with a short ram, an extension, and filter, velocity stack, or ebay scoop, etc. on the end of the pipe.
i like the OEM intake arm, and how it bolts up to the throttle body. seems to be a smoother air path than using any tube with a silicone coupler. that's what works for me, just have to get creative, because you'll find what works best for your setup concerning lengths and diameter.
try to have both a 2.75" and 3" OEM intake arm, or buy some 45 degree tubing from summit, JCW, jegs, Kteller, etc. and go crazy.
i wanna say try the 2.75" first, but regardless, you can't go wrong with a short ram, an extension, and filter, velocity stack, or ebay scoop, etc. on the end of the pipe.
i like the OEM intake arm, and how it bolts up to the throttle body. seems to be a smoother air path than using any tube with a silicone coupler. that's what works for me, just have to get creative, because you'll find what works best for your setup concerning lengths and diameter.
try to have both a 2.75" and 3" OEM intake arm, or buy some 45 degree tubing from summit, JCW, jegs, Kteller, etc. and go crazy.
i got a aem v1 cold air 1 peice i loved it when it was on my car if anyone wants it just pm me i will sell it for cheap and you can find out for your self how nice it is
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tempsohc
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
7
Apr 6, 2010 04:09 AM
ThightAccord
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
18
Mar 19, 2002 05:47 PM





