Opinions on PWR liquid barrel intercooler?
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
From: Home where gangbangers reside, CA, usa
Opinions on PWR liquid barrel intercooler?
Going boost on a my 91 DA and gathered everything thing i need except the intercooler. I was thrown an offer for a FMIC (air to air) but then my boss recommened to try out a liquid barrel intercooler (liquid to air). Search is down, and i was wondering if anyone is running one and what advantages you have over a (air to air) FMIC and if its worth 500-850 price range.
http://www.pwr-performance.com/
Modified by jkeno112 at 9:10 AM 9/18/2005
http://www.pwr-performance.com/
Modified by jkeno112 at 9:10 AM 9/18/2005
) and others on here have commented that those are actually quite restrictive, so I would stay away. Just run an air/air 
H-T White Ops
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,876
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
for track use....fine
for daily driving I'd say stick with the air/air. Once the liquid gets heat soaked it's going to remain that temp. Unless you run a pumps and circulate the liquid to a cooler outside the car to cool it back down. But then you basically have the same performance as you would with a decent air/air. setup.
for daily driving I'd say stick with the air/air. Once the liquid gets heat soaked it's going to remain that temp. Unless you run a pumps and circulate the liquid to a cooler outside the car to cool it back down. But then you basically have the same performance as you would with a decent air/air. setup.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL, usa
Re: (IslandSi)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by IslandSi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">for track use....fine
for daily driving I'd say stick with the air/air. Once the liquid gets heat soaked it's going to remain that temp. Unless you run a pumps and circulate the liquid to a cooler outside the car to cool it back down. But then you basically have the same performance as you would with a decent air/air. setup. </TD></TR></TABLE>
for daily driving I'd say stick with the air/air. Once the liquid gets heat soaked it's going to remain that temp. Unless you run a pumps and circulate the liquid to a cooler outside the car to cool it back down. But then you basically have the same performance as you would with a decent air/air. setup. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,411
Likes: 1
Re: (IslandSi)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by IslandSi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">for track use....fine
for daily driving I'd say stick with the air/air. Once the liquid gets heat soaked it's going to remain that temp. Unless you run a pumps and circulate the liquid to a cooler outside the car to cool it back down. But then you basically have the same performance as you would with a decent air/air. setup.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, but I don't know anybody who runs an air/water on the street without a heat exchanger.
for daily driving I'd say stick with the air/air. Once the liquid gets heat soaked it's going to remain that temp. Unless you run a pumps and circulate the liquid to a cooler outside the car to cool it back down. But then you basically have the same performance as you would with a decent air/air. setup.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, but I don't know anybody who runs an air/water on the street without a heat exchanger.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
