Sup guys. I will be making a trip to the dyno pretty soon, im finishing up my bottom end now. Heres the setup:

Motor is 98 JDM Type R
Skunk2 stage 3's
Skunk2 valves, retainers, springs
Full Port and polish , 3 angle valve job, etc. LOOKS SEXY!!
TWM Idividual throttle bodies
550cc RC Injectors
Walbro 255
Hytech Race header
Invidia Catback(Thinking about selling and gett 3" thermal..????)
84.5mm Sleeved bottom
Wiseco 84.5 12.5 pistons
Honda OEM Bearings
Chrome EMS

Now my question to you all is, should I use my type r crank or go with an LS, I have both just wondering which to use, more power..?? Thanks Guys.

Jon

 

well first off, your set-up is unique to you, and the dyno itself will obviously affect what kind of number u pull. I would say 225+ whp, but I'm no expert . looks like a solid set-up although i would have went with pro 1s or pro2s....

 

200-220whp

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by riceball777 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">200-220whp </TD></TR></TABLE>

 

215-220hp

 

ill say 236 whp 162lb with 87.2 crank and 227 whp 166lb with the 89mm crank

 

i wouldnt be surprised if you hit 220. let us know when the numbers come in.

 

What would it take to hit 250whp?? I'd be happy with 230.

 

a very very good flowing head and possibly degreeing your cams



Modified by HondaIntegraR at 6:20 PM 9/16/2005

 

$1, Bob!

 

more compression

 

its not a necessity, there are people who have put down 250+ with ~12.5 cr
but more compression and higher octane will give you more hp

 

I would go with the LS crank also.

 

So LS crank more power?

 

. . .and torque.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JMcDB18C &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Motor is 98 JDM Type R
Skunk2 stage 3's
Skunk2 valves, retainers, springs
Full Port and polish , 3 angle valve job, etc. LOOKS SEXY!!
TWM Idividual throttle bodies
550cc RC Injectors
</TD></TR></TABLE>

you should just sell me your head.

 

lol, yea let me pack it up...

 

more power??????

... bigger bore and stroke.


no way youre hitting 230 on that setup...

i'd say 210 tops.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by STREETWERKZ &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">more power??????

... bigger bore and stroke.


no way youre hitting 230 on that setup...

i'd say 210 tops. </TD></TR></TABLE>84.5mm ITR on ITB's with all the stuff he listed tuned, you think it won't make more than 210whp?

 

may wanna rethink those 550s. Thats way overkill. i put down 195 and my 440's had a duty cycle of 55%.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by STREETWERKZ &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">more power??????

... bigger bore and stroke.


no way youre hitting 230 on that setup...

i'd say 210 tops. </TD></TR></TABLE>

there are 1.8 street build out there pushing out 210+, why would you say 210 is the max for his 2.0 build, especially with his mods listed?

 

my car made 202 with 81.25mm bore. 11.6 compression. thats with a gsr intake manifold with the secondaries still functional
i dont see how they guy have any problems going over 210

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HondaIntegraR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

there are 1.8 street build out there pushing out 210+, why would you say 210 is the max for his 2.0 build, especially with his mods listed?</TD></TR></TABLE>

i didnt see that he was 84.5mm


i would still say 220HP

 

Everything is together now, I have my stock type r crank in there right now, im gonna bring it to get tuned next week, ill post the numbers sometime next week and some pics of the build. Thanks guys!