There is a lot to consider here as far as my dyno figures are concerned. When my car was tuned at APEXr, this was done on a Dyno Jet. The air temps were also very cold... in the upper 40 degrees that night. I am not sure what intake temps were but I can imagine they were much lower than my last 2 dyno sessions at Xact Dyno and Locash Racing. Not to mention, the dynos are totally different at Xact and Locash being that they are Dynapacks. They read differently and it is almost impossible to compare a run made on a Dyno Jet to the Dynapack. The car made 247.7whp and 182.2wtq



At Xact Dyno (25th June 10:39 A.M.) the ambient air temp was in the mid 80's in the building. Intake temps were 110-115 degrees. They have AC directed on the car. My car made 241whp and 186wtq.



At Locash Racing (27th August 4:47 P.M.) the ambient air temp was in the upper 110+ in the building. Intake temps were 155-160 degrees. Unfortunately they do not have AC. My car made 249whp and 199wtq.
there was a big jump in numbers when the car was cooler, but these numbers I don't consider "real life conditions".




Modified by 2point6 at 1:00 PM 8/31/2005

 

That is a seriously meaty tq curve.

 

Nice...I wish I had that kind of torque.

 

lookin nasty...that tq curve is the meatiest....

 

very nice curve. Dynapacks will read a lil higher due to the wheels being off the car, but who cares as long as you're getting tuning improvements. Nice work!

 

Depends on how the dynoapack is calibrated.

But seeing that this is how much on average hes made on dynojets its safe to say that this is a fair comparison.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BolivianFuego &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Depends on how the dynoapack is calibrated.

But seeing that this is how much on average hes made on dynojets its safe to say that this is a fair comparison.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Locash has used both dynojet and dynapack dynoes. So far the Dynapack is reading 8-10 percent lower than the Dynajet. I realize there is some calibration changes that can make it close to the Dynojet, but on average Joe has seen all previously dynoed (Dynojet) cars make less power on the Dynapack. Part of the problem is that the Dynojet uses time to measure how fast the drum spins. The Dynapack does not. (there is more to it, but this is not a dyno comparison thread) If a 4th gear run takes for example 15 seconds from 2000rpm to an 8000rpm redline then those figures could be entered into the Dynapak. The problem with that is, what if the car is making more or less power... the runs would take more or less time to complete. This makes the dyno comparison again not valid. I will post my previous Dynapack reading tomorrow for comparison.

 

Nice numbers...And the torque wow...So I hear Joe from locash best tuner in Az. My decisions were either Solid Technology in New Mexico or Locash. My decision has been made. Again Nice numbers.....

 

Great #'s

what kind of induction are you using?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rosko &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Great #'s

what kind of induction are you using?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Mother nature... and TWM's

 

really nice man. congrats on the power.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2point6 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Mother nature... and TWM's</TD></TR></TABLE>

Cool, I just built a set of ITB's and I get wait to get a motor together and try it out.

 

new info added to first post.

 

so is this the motor with the modified f23 crank and b-series rods?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vinuneuro &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> so is this the motor with the modified f23 crank and b-series rods?</TD></TR></TABLE>
No. this is my current engine that I have been running for years now.

 

I'm looking forward to seeing what your next motor puts down after seeing the dyno for your "old" motor.

 

yeah that tq is off the hook!!!!! mad props, wonder what it would do in a eg or ek

 

Holy torque batman. Those numbers are awesome. Congrats!!!