camber adjustments
I have new tires on the way so I plan on getting an alignment before I have my tires mounted.
I was wondering if I should do the rear washer trick to correct the rear camber as much as I can before taking it in for an alignment? Would it cause any problem to have less camber in the rear than the front?
My car is just a daily driver lowered about around 2.25". The bolts I have are 10x1.25 45mm grade 8.8 bolts and three 3/8 washers per bolt.
Modified by chowmien at 2:28 PM 8/29/2005
I was wondering if I should do the rear washer trick to correct the rear camber as much as I can before taking it in for an alignment? Would it cause any problem to have less camber in the rear than the front?
My car is just a daily driver lowered about around 2.25". The bolts I have are 10x1.25 45mm grade 8.8 bolts and three 3/8 washers per bolt.
Modified by chowmien at 2:28 PM 8/29/2005
did you search? please do there are a billion jillion topics on this and you dont' need a camber kit, go get an alignment and tell them "put the toe to zero" you will be fine
Yes I did search and looked through all of the topics before I went out and bought the bolts. I know that toe is more serious than camber. Just worried that camber might eat through my new tires quickly as well so I want to avoid it. I guess I'll just go ahead without the shimming and get it aligned.
If I shim the rears only then I will probably have more negative camber in the front than the rears. Is that desirable for a street setup?
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by chowmien »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If I shim the rears only then I will probably have more negative camber in the front than the rears. Is that desirable for a street setup?</TD></TR></TABLE>yes, it's more practical to have more neg camber in the front, than in the back.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gsrious »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yes, it's more practical to have more neg camber in the front, than in the back.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well, here's an example of the opposite. Not saying that this is better, just saying that blanket statements don't always hold true.
-4.75 degrees rear camber, +0.75 front camber. Font is out of spec, 2 degrees positive +- 0.5 is spec. Rear is actually in spec, which is 3.75 negative +- 1. 0 toe all around.

Now, I'm going to run my Integra around -3.0/-1.5 front/rear camber. Only time will tell how the Azenis like that.
And for the "camber eats tires" people, there's 10k miles on the tires and 3/4 of the tread left. Then again, I imagine my 155/80-13s have a bit more sidewall flex to help, especially with the recommended 21/26 psi.
Well, here's an example of the opposite. Not saying that this is better, just saying that blanket statements don't always hold true.
-4.75 degrees rear camber, +0.75 front camber. Font is out of spec, 2 degrees positive +- 0.5 is spec. Rear is actually in spec, which is 3.75 negative +- 1. 0 toe all around.

Now, I'm going to run my Integra around -3.0/-1.5 front/rear camber. Only time will tell how the Azenis like that.
And for the "camber eats tires" people, there's 10k miles on the tires and 3/4 of the tread left. Then again, I imagine my 155/80-13s have a bit more sidewall flex to help, especially with the recommended 21/26 psi.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
E36 Guy
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
16
Apr 7, 2006 09:58 AM
Wazup
Suspension & Brakes
5
Apr 29, 2005 08:10 PM
FourthGenHatch
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
11
Oct 1, 2002 07:00 PM



