First off I would like to say that W.O.P, Josh, yes I know your name, is a thief and a liar.


Steve, whom Josh works for, already sent me an e-mail regarding the theft of my pictures by Josh claiming it was him.

Second, Josh I will have my lawyer send you an invoice for the pictures that you infringed on my copyright for. Oh yes, you will now owe me for "your" pics that you have on your PC.

The pic posted in the General forum has drawn much attention, so much so that I have been contacted by lots of people, thanks all!

The pic is not even from Buttonwillow, see the Palm tree, do you think Palm Trees grow in Bakersfield?? You wouldn't know Josh, since you live in Utah.....
The guy who is in the picture I personally know! You picked the wrong guy!

So, go ahead and stick a fork in you Josh, cause your done.

Kent

The thread: https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1343151

 

Thats pretty lame. He might as well hold you up at knife point and take your wallet.

And to lie and say it is himself, thats fairly pathetic.

But I'm sure he has some side of the story to tell which will.........insert adjective here.

 

go post this in gdd...so everybody can see that this guy got owned!

 

trial users cannot post in GDD. i did post the link to this post in the GDD one tho.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mattcalica &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">go post this in gdd...so everybody can see that this guy got owned!</TD></TR></TABLE>
he cant, he is a trial user

and WOP deserves all you can give him if he is lying about the entire ******* situation

stick it to him.

 

So I guess noone is going to Photoshop it?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nexus131 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">So I guess noone is going to Photoshop it? </TD></TR></TABLE>

you rule hahahahaha

 

haha, this is great.

 

i think someone made up the name to mess with him but anyway it will be great fun

 

Suscribed. :

 

Dam, this is getting very interesting!

 

I salute you sir..

 

kick his *** sea-bass

 

how do we know that the PalomarPics.Net user is actually the photographer. he is a trial. this could be someone that saw the original thread and created this user.

just a thought

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cd6SiR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">how do we know that the PalomarPics.Net user is actually the photographer. he is a trial. this could be someone that saw the original thread and created this user.

just a thought </TD></TR></TABLE>

do you want a cookie?

 

Correct me if im wrong, but, isnt the rider the ONLY person the photog can sell the pics to unless the rider signed a model release form. Part of my job description is to photograpg girls for my club. I cant do **** with them unless they sign a release. Just wondering if that would apply with something like this

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cd6SiR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">how do we know that the PalomarPics.Net user is actually the photographer. he is a trial. this could be someone that saw the original thread and created this user.

just a thought </TD></TR></TABLE>

you should stop thinking.

 

Tony, Marty, and Chris, thank you for the e-mails regarding this matter.

I just hope this gets resolved in a quick and just manner.

Boosted: As motorcycle riders have leathers and helmets on they are not able to tell who is who like in a portrait of an individual, so model releases are not generally used in the practice for personal use. For magazine and commercial it is a different story.

Kent

 

from 15-22 i raced BMX religiously... don't have much time to ride now. there was a company called action photography, or something, i could be way off... that would come to the nationals or even some local events to take pictures of riders and sell them to the riders. whether or not you can see the rider's face and distinguish who they are, the images are still sole property of the photographer. the rider knew he was there and if he didn't want pics taken of him, he would have to state that to the photographer or ask them to delete them if already taken. in this case, he wants the picture, but doesn't want to pay for it.

he kinda dug himself a hole on this one by basically admitting to theft.

 

damn this is like a soap opera! i would like to hear wop's side of the story before i make any conclusions.

 

to the photographer...

I hope the thief gets whats coming to him

 

A big thumbs up to palomarpics.net for protecting photographers rights.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BoostedGSRBubble &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Correct me if im wrong, but, isnt the rider the ONLY person the photog can sell the pics to unless the rider signed a model release form. Part of my job description is to photograpg girls for my club. I cant do **** with them unless they sign a release. Just wondering if that would apply with something like this</TD></TR></TABLE>

no, if its in public you can sell the pic, the release is more of a formality of stupidity via happy go lucky people wanting to sue.
Public track.

 

This is interesting... but is there anything you can do, legally, in the matter?

There was an internet statement about having stolen media. It was a statement made on an automotive web forum, not the most reliable of a 'confession', and media gets stolen all the time online. It seems that the only folks really able to draw out the matter are big-buck MPAA and RIAA co-ops.

But really, I think it would be amazingly cool to serve a subpeona to this gentleman from your district court. No matter the verdict, if you ask me, justice is served in the trip over

Please, keep this up to date.

 

Kent, the palomarpics.net guy, is a local to me. He's a good guy and he's always up at palomar taking pix.